View Item 

Show simple item record

Trust and Information Sharing in Supply Chains
dc.contributor.authorEbrahim‐khanjari, Nedaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHopp, Wallace J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorIravani, Seyed M. R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-21T15:47:21Z
dc.date.available2013-07-01T14:33:05Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationEbrahim‐khanjari, Neda ; Hopp, Wallace; Iravani, Seyed M. R. (2012). "Trust and Information Sharing in Supply Chains." Production and Operations Management 21(3): 444-464. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/91120>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1059-1478en_US
dc.identifier.issn1937-5956en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/91120
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherSalespersonen_US
dc.subject.otherSocial Characteristicsen_US
dc.subject.otherInformation Sharingen_US
dc.subject.otherTrusten_US
dc.subject.otherSupply Chainen_US
dc.titleTrust and Information Sharing in Supply Chainsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelIndustrial and Operations Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/91120/1/poms1284.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1937-5956.2011.01284.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceProduction and Operations Managementen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOzer, O., Y. Zheng, K. Chen. 2011. Trust in forecast information sharing. Manage. Sci. 57 ( 6 ): 1111 – 1137.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevine, D. K. 1998. Modeling altruism and spitefulness in experiments. Rev. Econ. Dyn. 1 ( 3 ): 593 – 622.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLewicki, R. J., B. B. Bunker. 1995. Trust in relationships: A model of trust and development and decline. B. B. Bunker, J. Z. Rubin eds. Conflict, Cooperation and Justice: Essays Inspired by the Work of Morton Deutsch. Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA, 133 – 174.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMayer, R. C., J. H. Davis, F. D. Schoorman. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manage. Rev. 20 ( 3 ): 709 – 734.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcAfee, P. R., J. McMillan. 1987. Competition for agency contracts. RAND J. Econ. 18 ( 2 ): 296 – 307.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcKnight, D. H., N. L. Chervany. 1996. The meanings of trust. Working paper, University of Minnesota Carlson School of Management, Minneapolis, MN.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcKnight, D. H., L. L. Cummings, N. L. Chervany. 1998. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad. Manage. Rev. 23 ( 3 ): 473 – 490.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMellinger, G. D. 1956. Interpersonal trust as a factor in communication. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 52 ( 3 ): 304 – 309.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoorman, C., G. Zaltman, R. Deshpande. 1992. Relationships between providers and users of market research: The dynamics of trust within and between organizations. J. Mark. Res. 29 ( 3 ): 314 – 328.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRabin, M. 1993. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 83 ( 5 ): 1281 – 1302.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRen, Z. J., M. A. Cohen, T. H. Ho, C. Terwiesch. 2010. Information sharing in a long‐term supply chain relationship: The role of customer review strategy. Oper. Res. 58 ( 1 ): 81 – 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRousseau, D. M., S. B. Sitkin, R. S. Burt, C. Camerer. 1998. Introduction to special topic forum: Not so different after all: A cross‐discipline view of trust. Acad. Manage. Rev. 23 ( 3 ): 393 – 404.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, K. G., S. J. Carroll, S. J. Ashford. 1995. Intra‐ and interorganizational cooperation: Toward a research agenda. Acad. Manage. J. 38 ( 1 ): 7 – 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStone, M. 1961. The opinion pool. Ann. Math. Stat. 32 ( 4 ): 1339 – 1342.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTardy, C. H. 1988. Interpersonal evaluations: Measuring attraction and trust. C. H. Tardy ed. A Handbook for the Study of Human Communications, Chapter 10. Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ, 269 – 283.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaylor, T. A., E. L. Plambeck. 2007. Supply chain relationships and contracts: The impact of repeated interaction on capacity investment and procurement. Manage. Sci. 53 ( 10 ): 1577 – 1593.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTerwiesch, C., Z. J. Ren, T. H. Ho, M. A. Cohen. 2005. An empirical analysis of forecast sharing in the semiconductor equipment supply chain. Manage. Sci. 51 ( 2 ): 208 – 220.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThompson, L. L. 1991. Information exchange in negotiation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 27 ( 2 ): 161 – 179.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTsay, A. A., N. Agrawal. 2004. Channel conflict and coordination in the e‐commerce age. Prod. Oper. Manage. 13 ( 1 ): 93 – 110.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUzzi, B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Am. Sociol. Rev. 61 ( 4 ): 674 – 698.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZaheer, A., N. Venkatraman. 1995. Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange. Strateg. Manage. J. 16 ( 5 ): 373 – 392.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, E., A. T. Coughlan. 2002. Channel management: Structure, governance, and relationship management. B. A. Weitz, R. Wensley, eds. Handbook of Marketing. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 223 – 247.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAviv, Y. 2001. The effect of collaborative forecasting on supply chain performance. Manage. Sci. 47 ( 10 ): 1326 – 1343.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBendoly, E., K. Donohue, K. L. Schultz. 2006. Behavior in operations management: Assessing recent findings and revisiting old assumptions. J. Oper. Manage. 24 ( 6 ): 737 – 752.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerg, J., J. Dickhaut, K. McCabe. 1995. Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games Econ. Behav. 10 ( 1 ): 122 – 142.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBohnet, I., R. Zeckhauser. 2004. Trust, risk and betrayal. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 55 ( 4 ): 467 – 484.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBolton, G. E., A. Ockenfels. 2000. ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Am. Econ. Rev. 90 ( 1 ): 166 – 193.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCachon, G. P., M. Fisher. 2000. Supply chain inventory management and the value of shared information. Manage. Sci. 46 ( 8 ): 1032 – 1048.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarnevale, P. J. D., A. M. Isen. 1986. The influence of positive affect and visual access on the discovery of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Proc. 37 ( 1 ): 1 – 13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCharness, G., M. Rabin. 2002. Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Q. J. Econ. 117 ( 3 ): 817 – 869.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen, F. 2003. Information sharing and supply chain coordination. S. Graves, A. de Kok, eds. Supply Chain Management: Design, Coordination and Operation, Volume 11: Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 341 – 421.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClemen, R., R. Winkler. 1999. Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis. Risk Anal. 19 ( 2 ): 187 – 203.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrawford, V. P., J. Sobel. 1982. Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50 ( 6 ): 1431 – 1451.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrosby, L. A., K. R. Evans, D. Cowles. 1990. Relationship quality in services selling: An interpersonal influence perspective. J. Mark. 54 ( 3 ): 68 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCui, T. H., J. S. Raju, Z. J. Zhang. 2007. Fairness and channel coordination. Manage. Sci. 53 ( 8 ): 1303 – 1314.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEbrahim‐Khanjari, N., S. Iravani, H. Shin. 2011. The impact of the sales‐agent's efficiency and demand information on a supply chain. Working paper, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEngle‐Warnick, J., R. L. Slonim. 2004. The evolution of strategies in a repeated trust game. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 55 ( 4 ): 553 – 573.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFehr, E., K. M. Schmidt. 1999. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly J. Econ. 114 ( 3 ): 817 – 868.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGanesan, S. 1994. Determinants of long‐term orientation in buyer‐seller relationships. J. Mark. 58 ( 2 ): 1 – 19.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGachter, S., B. Herrmann, C. Thoni. 2004. Trust, voluntary cooperation, and socioeconomic background: Survey and experimental evidence. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 55 ( 4 ): 505 – 531.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlaeser, E. L., D. I. Laibson, J. A. Scheinkman, C. L. Soutter. 2000. Measuring trust. Q. J. Econ. 115 ( 3 ): 811 – 846.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHandfield, R. B., C. Bechtel. 2002. The role of trust and relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness. Ind. Mark. Manage. 31 ( 4 ): 367 – 382.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHo, T. H., N. Lim, C. F. Camerer. 2006. Modeling the psychology of consumer and firm behavior with behavioral economics. J. Mark. Res. 43 ( 3 ): 307 – 331.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHopp, W. J., S. M. R. Iravani, Z. Liu. 2010. The role of salespersons and incentives in supply chain performance. Working paper, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKollock, P. 1994. The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment, and trust. Am. J. Sociol. 100 ( 2 ): 313 – 345.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKramer, R. M. 1999. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 50 ( 1 ): 569 – 598.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLarzelere, R. E., T. L. Huston. 1980. The dyadic trust scale: Toward understanding interpersonal trust in close relationships. J. Marriage Fam. 42 ( 3 ): 595 – 604.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
poms1284.pdf
Size:
423.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.