Show simple item record

A comparison of the effect of age on levator ani and obturator internus muscle cross‐sectional areas and volumes in nulliparous women

dc.contributor.authorMorris, Vikky C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Meghan P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDeLancey, John O.L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAshton‐miller, James A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-21T15:47:28Z
dc.date.available2013-06-11T19:15:47Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationMorris, Vikky C.; Murray, Meghan P.; DeLancey, John O.L.; Ashton‐miller, James A. (2012). "A comparison of the effect of age on levator ani and obturator internus muscle crossâ sectional areas and volumes in nulliparous women ." Neurourology and Urodynamics 31(4): 481-486. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/91125>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0733-2467en_US
dc.identifier.issn1520-6777en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/91125
dc.description.abstractAims Functional tests have demonstrated minimal loss of vaginal closure force with age. So we tested the null hypotheses that age neither affects the maximum cross‐sectional area (CSA) nor the volume of the levator muscle. Corresponding hypotheses were also tested in the adjacent obturator internus muscle, which served as a control for the effect of age on appendicular muscle in these women. Methods Magnetic resonance images of 15 healthy younger (aged 21–25 years) and 12 healthy older nulliparous women (aged >63 years) were selected to avoid the confounding effect of childbirth. Models were created from tracing outlines of the levator ani muscle in the coronal plane, and obturator internus in the axial plane using 3D Slicer v. 3.4. Muscle volumes were calculated using Slicer, while CSA was measured using Imageware™ at nine locations. The hypotheses were tested using repeated measures analysis of variance with P  < 0.05 being considered significant. Results The effect of age did not reach statistical significance for the decrease in levator ani muscle maximum CSA or the decrease in volume (4.3%, P  = 0.62 and 10.9%, 0.12, respectively). However, age did significantly adversely decrease obturator internus muscle maximum CSA and volume (24.5% and 28.2%, P  < 0.001, respectively). Significant local age‐related changes were observed dorsally in both muscles. Conclusions Unlike the adjacent appendicular muscle, obturator internus, the levator ani muscle in healthy nullipara does not show evidence of significant age‐related atrophy. Neurourol. Urodynam. 31:481–486, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherNulliparaen_US
dc.subject.otherSarcopeniaen_US
dc.subject.otherPelvic Flooren_US
dc.subject.otherAgingen_US
dc.titleA comparison of the effect of age on levator ani and obturator internus muscle cross‐sectional areas and volumes in nulliparous womenen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiomechanics Research Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, GGB 3208, 2350 Hayward St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109‐2125.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Gerontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherFranklin W. Olin College of Engineering, Needham, Massachusettsen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity College London Hospital, London, Englanden_US
dc.identifier.pmid22378544en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/91125/1/21208_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/nau.21208en_US
dc.identifier.sourceNeurourology and Urodynamicsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMargulies RU, Hsu Y, Kearney R, et al. Appearance of the levator ani muscle subdivisions in magnetic resonance images. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 1064 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorgan DM, Kaur G, Hsu Y, et al. Does vaginal closure force differ in the supine and standing positions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 1722 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKearney R, Miller JM, Ashton‐Miller JA, et al. Obstetric factors associated with levator ani muscle injury after vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107: 144 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeLancey JOL, Miller JM, Morgan DM, et al. Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 295 – 302.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAshton‐Miller JA, DeLancey JOL, Warwick DN. Method and apparatus for measuring properties of the pelvic floor muscles, US Patent # 6,468,232 B1, October 2002.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrowbridge ER, Wei JT, Fenner DE, et al. Effects of aging on lower urinary tract and pelvic floor function in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 715 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLexell J. Human aging, muscle mass, and fiber type composition. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1995; 50A: 11 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrooks SV, Faulkner JA. Skeletal muscle weakness in old age: Underlying mechanisms. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994; 26: 432 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThelen DG, Schultz AB, Alexander NB, et al. Effects of age on rapid ankle torque development. J Gerontol A Biol Med Sci 1996; 51A: M226 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIkai M, Fukunaga T. Calculation of muscle strength per unit cross‐sectional area of human muscle by means of ultrasonic measurement. Int Z Angew Physiol 1968; 26: 26 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFukunaga T, Miyatani M, Tachi M, et al. Muscle volume is a major determinant of joint torque in humans. Acta Physiol Scand 172: 249 – 55.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHsu Y, Chen L, Heubner M, et al. Quantification of levator ani cross‐sectional area differences between women with and those without prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 879 – 83.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDietz HP, Lanzarone V. Levator trauma after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 707 – 12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTunn R, Delancey JO, Howard D, et al. Anatomic variations in the levator ani muscle, endopelvic fascia, and urethra in nulliparas evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 116 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuford TW, Anton SD, Judge AR, et al. et al. Models of accelerated sarcopenia: Critical pieces for solving the puzzle of age‐related muscle atrophy. Ageing Res Rev 2010; 9: 369 – 83.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeLancey JO, Miller JM, Kearney R, et al. Vaginal birth and de novo stress incontinence: Relative contributions of urethral dysfunction and mobility. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 354 – 62.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShobeiri SA, Chesson RR, Gasser RF. The internal innervation and morphology of the human female levator ani muscle. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 686.e1 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGilpin SA, Gosling JA, Smith AR, et al. The pathogenesis of genitourinary prolapse and stress incontinence of urine. A histological and histochemical study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 15 – 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHelt M, Benson JT, Russell B, et al. Levator ani muscle in women with genitourinary prolapse: Indirect assessment by muscle histopathology. Neurourol Urodyn 1996; 15: 17 – 29.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller JM, Ashton‐Miller JA, Perruchini D, et al. Test‐retest reliability of an instrumented speculum for measuring vaginal closure force. Neurourol Urodyn 2007; 26: 858 – 63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeemhoff M, Shek KL, Dietz HP. Effects of age on levator function and morphometry of the levator hiatus in women with pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2010; 21: 1137 – 42.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwift SE. The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 277 – 85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWong MY, Harmanli OH, Agar M, et al. Collagen content of nonsupport tissue in pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 1597 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJackson SR, Avery NC, Tarlton JF, et al. Changes in metabolism of collagen in genitourinary prolapse. Lancet 1996; 347: 1658 – 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBailey AJ. Molecular mechanisms of ageing in connective tissues. Mech Ageing Dev 2001; 122: 735 – 55.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen L, Hsu Y, Ashton‐Miller JA, et al. Measurement of the pubic portion of the levator ani muscle in women with unilateral defects in 3‐D models from MR images. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2006; 90: 234 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 501 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWu JM, Hundley AF, Fulton RG, et al. Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. Women: 2010 to 2050. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 1278 – 83.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoyte L, Jakab M, Warfield SK, et al. Levator ani thickness variations in symptomatic and asymptomatic women using magnetic resonance‐based 3‐dimensional color mapping. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 856 – 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAshton‐Miller JA, DeLancey JOL. On the biomechanics of vaginal birth and common sequelae. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2009; 11: 163 – 76.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.