Show simple item record

Investigating Predictors of Plant Establishment During Roadside Restoration

dc.contributor.authorHaan, Nathan L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHunter, MaryCarol R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHunter, Mark D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-21T15:49:02Z
dc.date.available2013-07-01T14:33:05Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationHaan, Nathan L.; Hunter, MaryCarol R.; Hunter, Mark D. (2012). "Investigating Predictors of Plant Establishment During Roadside Restoration." Restoration Ecology 20(3). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/91190>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1061-2971en_US
dc.identifier.issn1526-100Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/91190
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherUrban Ecosystemsen_US
dc.subject.otherPlant Distributionen_US
dc.subject.otherHighway Restorationen_US
dc.subject.otherCoefficient of Conservatismen_US
dc.subject.otherMicroclimateen_US
dc.subject.otherSoil Compactionen_US
dc.titleInvestigating Predictors of Plant Establishment During Roadside Restorationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Natural Resource and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid19289605en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/91190/1/j.1526-100X.2011.00802.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1526-100X.2011.00802.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceRestoration Ecologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRies, L., D. M. Debinski, and M. L. Wieland. 2001. Conservation value of roadside prairie restoration to butterfly communities. Conservation Biology 15: 401 – 411.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHunter, M. R., and M. D. Hunter. 2008. Designing for conservation of insects in the built environment. Insect Conservation and Diversity 1: 189 – 196.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIverson, L. R., M. W. Schwartz, and A. M. Prasad. 2004. Potential colonization of newly available tree‐species habitat under climate change: an analysis for five eastern US species. Landscape Ecology 19: 787 – 799.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJodoin, Y., C. Lavoie, P. Villeneuve, M. Theriault, J. Beaulieu, and F. Belzile. 2007. Highways as corridors and habitats for the invasive common reed Phragmites australis in Quebec, Canada. Journal of Applied Ecology 45: 459 – 466.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarim, M. N., and A. U. Mallik. 2008. Roadside revegetation by native plants I. Roadside microhabitats, floristic zonation and species traits. Ecological Engineering 32: 222 – 237.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKost, M. A., D. A. Albert, J. G. Cohen, B. S. Slaughter, R. K. Schillo, C. R. Weber, and K. A. Chapman. 2007. Natural communities of Michigan: classification and description. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Report No. 2007‐21, Lansing, Michigan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeather, S. R., and A. J. Helden. 2005. Magic roundabouts? Teaching conservation in schools and universities. Journal of Biological Education 39: 102 – 107.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoles, A. T., and M. Westoby. 2006. Seed size and plant strategy across the whole life cycle. Oikos 113: 91 – 105.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOpperman, J. J., and A. M. Merenlender. 2000. Deer herbivory as an ecological constraint to restoration of degraded riparian corridors. Restoration Ecology 8: 41 – 47.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParsons, R., and T. C. Daniels. 2002. Good looking: in defense of scenic landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning 60: 43 – 56.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePavao‐Zuckerman, M. 2008. The nature of urban soils and their role in ecological restoration of cities. Restoration Ecology 16: 642 – 649.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQuinn, G. P., and M. J. Keough. 2002. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoberts, R. E., D. L. Clark, and M. V. Wilson. 2010. Traits, neighbors, and species performance in prairie restoration. Applied Vegetation Science 13: 270 – 279.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaarinen, K., A. Valtonen, J. Jantunen, and S. Saarnio. 2005. Butterflies and diurnal moths along road verges: does road type affect diversity and abundance? Biological Conservation 123: 403 – 412.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrek, H. J, and J. B. Weber. 1982. Behaviour of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in soils and plants. Environmental Pollution 28: 291 – 312.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwink, F., and G. Wilhelm. 1994. Plants of the Chicago region. Indiana Academy of Science, Indianapolis, Indiana.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThompson, J. R., and A. J. Rutter. 1986. The salinity of motorway soils IV. Effects of sodium chloride on some native British shrub species, and the possibility of establishing shrubs on the central reserves of motorways. Journal of Applied Ecology 23: 299 – 315.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTormo, J., E. Bochet, and P. García‐Fayos. 2007. Roadfill revegetation in semiarid Mediterranean environments. Part II: topsoiling, species selection, and hydroseeding. Restoration Ecology 15: 97 – 102.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTormo, J., P. García‐Fayos, and E. Bochet. 2008. Relative importance of plant traits and ecological filters in road embankment revegetation under semiarid Mediterranean conditions. Ecological Engineering 33: 258 – 264.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUSDA. 2010. Plants Database. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVon der Lippe, M., and I. Kowarik. 2007. Long‐distance dispersal of plants by vehicles as a driver of plant invasions. Conservation Biology 21: 986 – 996.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVoss, E. G. 1985. Michigan flora. Part II. Cranbrook Institute of Science Bulletin 59 and University of Michigan Herbarium.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVoss, E. G. 1996. Michigan flora. Part III. Cranbrook Institute of Science Bulletin 61 and University of Michigan Herbarium.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson, S. D., and A. K. Gerry. 1995. Strategies for mixed‐grass prairie restoration: Herbicide, tilling, and nitrogen manipulation. Restoration Ecology 3: 290 – 298.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndres, P., and M. Jorba. 2000. Mitigation strategies in some motorway embankments (Catalonia, Spain). Restoration Ecology 8: 268 – 275.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerli, M., J. M. Kirby, S. M. Springman, and R. Schulin. 2003. Modeling compaction of agricultural subsoils by tracked heavy construction machinery under various moisture conditions in Switzerland. Soil & Tillage Research 73: 57 – 66.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBischoff, A., T. Steinger, and H. Muller‐Scharer. 2010. The importance of plant provenance and genotypic diversity of seed material used for ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology 18: 338 – 348.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBochet, E., P. Garcia‐Fayos, and J. Tormo. 2010. How can we control erosion of roadslopes in semiarid Mediterranean areas? Soil improvement and native plant establishment. Land Degradation & Development 21: 110 – 121.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBouyoucos, G. J. 1936. Directions for making mechanical analysis of soils by the hydrometer method. Soil Science 42: 225 – 229.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrady, N. C., and R. R. Weil. 2002. The nature and properties of soils. 13 th edition. Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChatterjee, A., and R. Lal. 2009. On farm assessment of tillage impact on soil carbon and associated soil quality parameters. Soil & Tillage Research 104: 270 – 277.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceColeman, D. C., D. A. Crossley, and P. F. Hendrix. 2004. Fundamentals of soil ecology. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis, M. A., J. P. Grime, and K. Thompson. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. Journal of Ecology 88: 528 – 534.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceForman, R. T. T., D. Sperling, J. A. Bissonette, A. P. Clevenger, C. D. Cutshall, V. H. Dale, et al. 2003. Road ecology: science and solutions. Island Press, Washington, D.C.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGobster, P. H., J. L. Nassauer, T. C. Daniel, and G. Frey. 2007. The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landscape Ecology 22: 959 – 972.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHandel, S. N., G. R. Robinson, W. F. J. Parsons, and J. H. Mattei. 1997. Restoration of woody plants to capped landfills: root dynamics in an engineered soil. Restoration Ecology 5: 178 – 186.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarper‐Lore, B., and M. Wilson, editors. 1999. Roadside use of native plants. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHelden, A. J, and S. R. Leather. 2004. Biodiversity on urban roundabouts—Hemiptera, management and the species‐area relationship. Basic and Applied Ecology 5: 367 – 377.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHerman, K. D., L. A. Masters, M. R. Penskar, A. A. Reznicik, G. S. Wilhelm, W. W. Brodovich, and K. P. Gardiner. 2001. Floristic quality assessment with wetland categories and examples of computer applications for the State of Michigan: revised. 2 nd edition. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife Division, Natural Heritage Program, Lansing, Michigan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHopwood, J. L. 2008. The contribution of roadside grassland restorations to native bee conservation. Biological Conservation 141: 2632 – 2640.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoward, R. J. 2010. Intraspecific variation in growth of marsh macrophytes in response to salinity and soil type: implications for wetland restoration. Estuaries and Coasts 33: 127 – 138.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.