Show simple item record

Evaluating Teachers’ Decisions in Posing a Proof Problem

dc.contributor.authorKosko, Karl
dc.contributor.authorHerbst, Patricio
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-29T09:29:12Z
dc.date.available2012-05-29T09:29:12Z
dc.date.issued2012-05-29
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/91282
dc.description.abstractWhen Geometry teachers pose proof problems to students, it is the teacher who provides the givens and the statement to be proven; we hypothesize that teachers of geometry recognize this to be the norm. This study examined teachers’ decision-making in regards to the posing of a proof problem, and whether recognition of this norm accounted for the decision made. Results of a multinomial regression indicated that the more participants recognized that norm of posing proof problems, the less likely they were to select an action that breached the norm.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipResearch reported had the support of the National Science Foundation through grant DRL-0918425 to P. Herbst. All opinions are those of the authors and don’t necessarily reflect the views of the Foundation.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectDecision-makingen_US
dc.subjectPractical Rationalityen_US
dc.subjectInstructional Normsen_US
dc.subjectGeometryen_US
dc.titleEvaluating Teachers’ Decisions in Posing a Proof Problemen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducation
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumEducation, School ofen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/91282/1/PMENA_2012_Decision_finalweb.pdf
dc.identifier.sourceTo be included in the 2012 Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Kalamazoo, MI.en_US
dc.owningcollnameEducation, School of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.