Show simple item record

Developing Preservice Elementary Teachers' Pedagogical Design Capacity for Reform‐Based Curriculum Design

dc.contributor.authorBeyer, Carrie J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Elizabeth A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-15T14:33:22Z
dc.date.available2013-08-01T14:04:39Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationBeyer, Carrie J. ; Davis, Elizabeth A. (2012). "Developing Preservice Elementary Teachers' Pedagogical Design Capacity for Reformâ Based Curriculum Design." Curriculum Inquiry 42(3). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/91354>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0362-6784en_US
dc.identifier.issn1467-873Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/91354
dc.description.abstractTeachers use curriculum materials as a guide in their planning, critiquing and adapting them to address reform‐based goals and practices and specific contextual needs. To become well‐started beginners in planning lessons, novice teachers need opportunities to develop their pedagogical design capacity—that is, their ability to use personal and curricular resources in designing instruction for students. This study investigated the use of reform‐based criteria in supporting 24 preservice teachers enrolled in an elementary science methods course. In learning about and applying criteria, the preservice teachers developed aspects of their pedagogical design capacity by expanding their analysis ideas and refining their knowledge and beliefs about curriculum design. However, many struggled with analyzing lesson plans in a reform‐oriented way during student teaching. This occurred, in part, because the preservice teachers navigated different settings that conveyed conflicting ideas about the reasons why teachers make modifications. The methods course emphasized the importance of modifying materials to promote reform‐based science teaching, but few preservice teachers observed their mentor teachers make adaptations for this reason. These findings have important implications for theoretical models on curriculum materials use and the design of science teacher education.en_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.titleDeveloping Preservice Elementary Teachers' Pedagogical Design Capacity for Reform‐Based Curriculum Designen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid21816459en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/91354/1/j.1467-873X.2012.00599.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00599.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceCurriculum Inquiryen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRemillard, J. T. ( 2005 ). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75 ( 2 ), 211 – 246.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrossman, P., & Thompson, C. ( 2008 ). Learning from curriculum materials: Scaffolds for new teachers? Teaching and Teacher Education, 24 ( 8 ), 2014 – 2026.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKesidou, S., & Roseman, J. E. ( 2002 ). How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 ( 6 ), 522 – 549.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLloyd, G. M., & Behm, S. L. ( 2005 ). Preservice elementary teachers' analysis of mathematics instructional materials. Action in Teacher Education, 26 ( 4 ), 48 – 62.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMulholland, J., & Wallace, J. ( 2005 ). Growing the tree of teacher knowledge: Ten years of learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42 ( 7 ), 767 – 790.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Center for Education Statistics (NCES). ( 2007 ). Digest of education statistics, 2007. Retrieved July 22, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d07/en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNicol, C. C., & Crespo, S. M. ( 2006 ). Learning to teach with mathematics textbooks: How preservice teachers interpret and use curriculum materials. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62, 331 – 355.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePintó, R. ( 2004 ). Introducing curriculum innovations in science: Identifying teachers' transformations and the design of related teacher education. Science Education, 89, 1 – 12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRemillard, J. T. ( 1999 ). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining teachers' curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 19 ( 3 ), 315 – 342.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRemillard, J. T., & Bryans, M. B. ( 2004 ). Teachers' orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 35 ( 5 ), 352 – 388.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwarz, C., Gunckel, K., Smith, E., Covitt, B., Bae, M., Enfield, M., et al. ( 2008 ). Helping elementary pre‐service teachers learn to use science curriculum materials for effective science teaching. Science Education, 92 ( 2 ), 345 – 377.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSherin, M. G., & Drake, C. ( 2009 ). Curriculum strategy framework: Investigating patterns in teachers' use of a reform‐based elementary mathematics curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41 ( 4 ), 467 – 500.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSquire, K. D., MaKinster, J. G., Barnett, M., Luehmann, A. L., & Barab, S. L. ( 2003 ). Designed curriculum and local culture: Acknowledging the primacy of classroom culture. Science Education, 87 ( 4 ), 468 – 489.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStern, L., & Roseman, J. E. ( 2004 ). Can middle‐school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum evaluation study: Life science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41 ( 6 ), 538 – 568.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrauss, A., & Corbin, J. ( 1998 ). Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory ( 2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValencia, S. W., Place, N. A., Martin, S. D., & Grossman, P. L. ( 2006 ). Curriculum materials for elementary reading: Shackles and scaffolds for four beginning teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 107 ( 1 ), 93 – 120.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWertsch, J. W. ( 1991 ). Voices in the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBall, D. L., & Feiman‐Nemser, S. ( 1988 ). Using textbooks and teachers' guides: A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators. Curriculum Inquiry, 18 ( 4 ), 401 – 423.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBen‐Peretz, M. ( 1990 ). The teacher‐curriculum encounter: Freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts. Albany: State University New York Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeyer, C. J., & Davis, E. A. ( 2009 ). Using educative curriculum materials to support preservice elementary teachers' curricular planning: A comparison between two different forms of support. Curriculum Inquiry, 39 ( 5 ), 679 – 703.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeyer, C. J., & Davis, E. A. ( 2012 ). Learning to critique and adapt science curriculum materials: Examining the development of preservice elementary teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 96 ( 1 ), 130 – 157.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeyer, C. J., Delgado, C., Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. ( 2009 ). Investigating teacher learning supports in high school biology textbooks to inform the design of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 ( 9 ), 977 – 998.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, M. W. ( 2009 ). The teacher‐tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel‐Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17 – 36 ). New York: Routledge.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBullough, R. V. J. ( 1992 ). Beginning teacher curriculum decision making, personal teaching metaphors, and teacher education. Teaching & Teacher Education, 8 ( 3 ), 239 – 252.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. ( 1992 ). Teacher as curriculum maker. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 363 – 401 ). New York: Macmillan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. ( 2003 ). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32 ( 1 ), 9 – 13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollopy, R. ( 2003 ). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a mathematics textbook affected two teachers' learning. The Elementary School Journal, 103 ( 3 ), 227 – 311.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis, E. A. ( 2006 ). Preservice elementary teachers' critique of instructional materials for science. Science Education, 90 ( 2 ), 348 – 375.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis, E. A., & Smithey, J. ( 2009 ). Beginners moving toward effective elementary science teaching. Science Education, 93 ( 4 ), 745 – 770.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDinkelman, T. ( 2003 ). Self‐study in teacher education: A means and ends tool for promoting reflective teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 54 ( 1 ), 6 – 18.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDrake, C., & Sherin, M. G. ( 2006 ). Practicing change: Curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics education reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36 ( 2 ), 153 – 187.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceForbes, C., & Davis, E. A. ( 2008 ). The development of preservice elementary teachers' curricular role identity for science teaching. Science Education, 92 ( 5 ), 909 – 940.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceForbes, C. T., & Davis, E. A. ( 2010 ). Curriculum design for inquiry: Preservice elementary teachers' mobilization and adaptation of science curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47 ( 7 ), 820 – 839.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrykholm, J. A. ( 2004 ). Teachers' tolerance for discomfort: Implications for curricular reform in mathematics. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 19 ( 2 ), 125 – 149.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.