Show simple item record

On Using Summary Statistics from an External Calibration Sample to Correct for Covariate Measurement Error

dc.contributor.authorGuo, Ying
dc.contributor.authorLittle, Roderick J.
dc.contributor.authorMcConnell, Dan S.
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-28T14:59:28Z
dc.date.available2012-06-28T14:59:28Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationEpidemiology , 23(1), 165-174. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/91891>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/91891
dc.description.abstractBackground: Covariate measurement error is common in epidemiologic studies. Current methods for correcting measurement error with information from external calibration samples are insufficient to provide valid adjusted inferences. We consider the problem of estimating the regression of an outcome Y on covariates X and Z, where Y and Z are observed, X is unobserved, but a variable W that measures X with error is observed. Information about measurement error is provided in an external calibration sample where data on X and W (but not Y and Z) are recorded. Methods: We describe a method that uses summary statistics from the calibration sample to create multiple imputations of the missing values of X in the regression sample, so that the regression coefficients of Y on X and Z and associated standard errors can be estimated using simple multiple imputation combining rules, yielding valid statistical inferences under the assumption of a multivariate normal distribution. Results: The proposed method is shown by simulation to provide better inferences than existing methods, namely the naive method, classical calibration, and regression calibration, particularly for correction for bias and achieving nominal confidence levels. We also illustrate our method with an example using linear regression to examine the relation between serum reproductive hormone concentrations and bone mineral density loss in midlife women in the Michigan Bone Health and Metabolism Study. Conclusions: Existing methods fail to adjust appropriately for bias due to measurement error in the regression setting, particularly when measurement error is substantial. The proposed method corrects this deficiency.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleOn Using Summary Statistics from an External Calibration Sample to Correct for Covariate Measurement Erroren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/91891/1/lit2012guoepid.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/EDE.0b013e31823a4386
dc.identifier.sourceEpidemiologyen_US
dc.owningcollnamePublic Health, School of (SPH)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.