On Using Summary Statistics from an External Calibration Sample to Correct for Covariate Measurement Error
dc.contributor.author | Guo, Ying | |
dc.contributor.author | Little, Roderick J. | |
dc.contributor.author | McConnell, Dan S. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-28T14:59:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-28T14:59:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Epidemiology , 23(1), 165-174. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/91891> | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/91891 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Covariate measurement error is common in epidemiologic studies. Current methods for correcting measurement error with information from external calibration samples are insufficient to provide valid adjusted inferences. We consider the problem of estimating the regression of an outcome Y on covariates X and Z, where Y and Z are observed, X is unobserved, but a variable W that measures X with error is observed. Information about measurement error is provided in an external calibration sample where data on X and W (but not Y and Z) are recorded. Methods: We describe a method that uses summary statistics from the calibration sample to create multiple imputations of the missing values of X in the regression sample, so that the regression coefficients of Y on X and Z and associated standard errors can be estimated using simple multiple imputation combining rules, yielding valid statistical inferences under the assumption of a multivariate normal distribution. Results: The proposed method is shown by simulation to provide better inferences than existing methods, namely the naive method, classical calibration, and regression calibration, particularly for correction for bias and achieving nominal confidence levels. We also illustrate our method with an example using linear regression to examine the relation between serum reproductive hormone concentrations and bone mineral density loss in midlife women in the Michigan Bone Health and Metabolism Study. Conclusions: Existing methods fail to adjust appropriately for bias due to measurement error in the regression setting, particularly when measurement error is substantial. The proposed method corrects this deficiency. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.title | On Using Summary Statistics from an External Calibration Sample to Correct for Covariate Measurement Error | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Public Health | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/91891/1/lit2012guoepid.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31823a4386 | |
dc.identifier.source | Epidemiology | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Public Health, School of (SPH) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.