Relationship between quantitative CT metrics and health status and BODE in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
dc.contributor.author | Martinez, Carlos H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, Ya-Hong | |
dc.contributor.author | Westgate, Phillip M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Liu, Lyrica X. | |
dc.contributor.author | Murray, Susan | |
dc.contributor.author | Curtis, Jeffrey L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Make, Barry J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kazerooni, Ella A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lynch, David A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Marchetti, Nathaniel | |
dc.contributor.author | Washko, George R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Martinez, Fernando J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Han, MeiLan K. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-07-01T20:35:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-07-01T20:35:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Thorax 2012 vol. 67, pp. 399-406 <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/91946> | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/91946 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background The value of quantitative CT (QCT) to identify chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) phenotypes is increasingly appreciated. The authors hypothesised that QCT-defined emphysema and airway abnormalities relate to St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and Body-Mass Index, Airflow Obstruction, Dyspnea and Exercise Capacity Index (BODE). Methods 1200 COPDGene subjects meeting Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria for COPD with QCT analysis were included. Total lung emphysema was measured using the density mask technique with a 950 Hounsfield unit threshold. An automated programme measured mean wall thickness (WT), wall area percentage (WA%) and 10 mm lumenal perimeter (pi10) in six segmental bronchi. Separate multivariate analyses examined the relative influence of airway measures and emphysema on SGRQ and BODE. Results In separate models predicting SGRQ score, a 1 unit SD increase in each airway measure predicted higher SGRQ scores (for WT, 1.90 points higher, p=0.002; for WA%, 1.52 points higher, p=0.02; for pi10, 2.83 points higher p<0.001). The comparable increase in SGRQ for a 1 unit SD increase in emphysema percentage in these models was relatively weaker, significant only in the pi10 model (for emphysema percentage, 1.45 points higher, p=0.01). In separate models predicting BODE, a 1 unit SD increase in each airway measure predicted higher BODE scores (for WT, 1.07-fold increase, p<0.001; for WA%, 1.20-fold increase, p<0.001; for pi10, 1.16-fold increase, p<0.001). In these models, emphysema more strongly influenced BODE (range 1.24-1.26-fold increase, p<0.001). Conclusion Emphysema and airway disease both relate to clinically important parameters. The relative influence of airway disease is greater for SGRQ; the relative influence of emphysema is greater for BODE. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.title | Relationship between quantitative CT metrics and health status and BODE in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Public Health | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Biostatistics, Department of Radiology | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/91946/1/2012 Thorax Relationship between quantitative CT metrics and health status and BODE in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.pdf | |
dc.identifier.source | Thorax | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Public Health, School of (SPH) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.