Show simple item record

Ki-67 Expression in Breast Cancer; Its Association with Grading Systems, Clinical Parameters and Other Prognostic Factors -- A Surrogate Marker?

dc.contributor.authorTrihia, Helen
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Susan
dc.contributor.authorPrice, Karen
dc.contributor.authorGelber, Richard D.
dc.contributor.authorGolouh, Rastko
dc.contributor.authorGoldhirsch, Aron
dc.contributor.authorCoates, Alan S.
dc.contributor.authorCollins, John
dc.contributor.authorCastiglione-Gertsch, Monica
dc.contributor.authorGusterson, Barry
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-01T21:53:43Z
dc.date.available2012-07-01T21:53:43Z
dc.date.issued2003-03-01
dc.identifier.citationCancer 2003 vol. 97 no. 5, pp. 1321-1331. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/91948>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/91948
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND. The number of mitoses and, thus, the proliferative capacity of a tumor is one of the most crucial variables for tumor grading. The Ki-67 nuclear antigen may be considered as an alternative to mitotic counts in grading schemes and as a single parameter that can be used in fine-needle aspirates and small biopsies. METHODS. Immunohistochemistry using the anti-Ki-67 antibody MIB-1 was performed on 434 breast carcinoma specimens from the International Breast Cancer Study Group (formerly Ludwig) Trial V. Three groups based on Ki-67 percent were used to replace the mitotic counts component in the Nottingham grade (NHG) to produce the Nottingham/Ki-67 grade (NKG) and to assess Ki-67 as a single parameter. RESULTS. In both the lymph node positive subgroup and the lymph node negative subgroup, the NKG and Ki-67 group was correlated significantly with Bloom– Richardson grade (BRG), NHG, and Nottingham type. Tumor size in the lymph node negative cohort and estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, and c-erbB-2 expression in the lymph node positive cohort also were correlated significantly with NKG. Ki-67 percentage was correlated significantly with c-erbB-2 expression in the lymph node positive cohort only. NKG was similar to BRG and NHG when it was evaluated for prognostic significance. Patients with higher categoric Ki-67 percentages had worse overall and disease free survival in all groups except for the untreated, lymph node negative group. CONCLUSIONS. Ki-67 detection represents a valuable tool and is a good objective substitute for mitotic counts when used in a grading system. When it is used alone, Ki-67 detection provides valuable information, although it is necessary to combine this with other parameters in the study of core biopsies and fine-needle aspirates.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectKi-67en_US
dc.subjectMIB-1en_US
dc.subjectBreast Carcinomaen_US
dc.subjectHistologic Gradeen_US
dc.subjectNottingham Gradeen_US
dc.subjectBloom–Richardson Gradeen_US
dc.titleKi-67 Expression in Breast Cancer; Its Association with Grading Systems, Clinical Parameters and Other Prognostic Factors -- A Surrogate Marker?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biostatisticsen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherInternational Breast Cancer Study Group Pathology Center, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherInternational Breast Cancer Study Group Statistical Center, Boston, Massachusettsen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherFrontier Science and Technology Research Foundation, Boston, Massachusettsen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biostatistical Science, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/91948/1/2003 Cancer Ki-67 Expression in Breast Carcinoma.pdf
dc.identifier.sourceCanceren_US
dc.owningcollnamePublic Health, School of (SPH)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.