View Item 

Show simple item record

Investigating the relationships between environmental stressors and stream condition using Bayesian belief networks
dc.contributor.authorAllan, J. Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorYuan, Lester L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBlack, Paulen_US
dc.contributor.authorStockton, Tomen_US
dc.contributor.authorDavies, Peter E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMagierowski, Regina H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRead, Steve M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-12T17:23:23Z
dc.date.available2013-09-03T15:38:27Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationAllan, J. David ; Yuan, Lester L. ; Black, Paul ; Stockton, Tom ; Davies, Peter E. ; Magierowski, Regina H. ; Read, Steve M. (2012). "Investigating the relationships between environmental stressors and stream condition using Bayesian belief networks." Freshwater Biology 57. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/92037>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0046-5070en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2427en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/92037
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherStream Impairmenten_US
dc.subject.otherCausal Inferenceen_US
dc.subject.otherStream Managementen_US
dc.subject.otherBayesian Belief Networken_US
dc.subject.otherMultiple Stressorsen_US
dc.titleInvestigating the relationships between environmental stressors and stream condition using Bayesian belief networksen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Natural Resources & Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherForestry Tasmania, Hobart, Tas., Australiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSchool of Zoology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas., Australiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNeptune and Company, Inc., Lakewood, CO, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUS Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC, U.S.A.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/92037/1/j.1365-2427.2011.02683.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02683.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceFreshwater Biologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNRM South ( 2009 ) Tasmanian River Condition Index Reference Manual. NRM South, Hobart, Australia, 250 pp. Accessed online 1 July 2009 at: http://www.nrmsouth.org.au/uploaded/287/15130402_19trcireferencemanualweb.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaas T.C., Mowrer H.T. & Shepperd W.D. ( 1994 ) Modeling aspen stand growth with a temporal Bayes network. Artificial Intelligence Applications, 8, 15 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHershey A.E., Fortino K., Peterson B.J. & Ulseth A.J. ( 2006 ) Stream food webs. In: Methods in Stream Ecology (Eds F.H. Hauer & G.A. Lamberti ), pp. 637 – 661. Academic Press, Burlington.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHughes J.M.R. ( 1987 ) Hydrological characteristics and classification of Tasmanian rivers. Australian Geographical Studies, 25, 61 – 82.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHughes R.M., Wang L. & Seelbach P.W. (Eds) ( 2006 ) Influences of Landscape on Stream Habitats and Biological Assemblages. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 48, Bethesda, Maryland.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInfante D.M. & Allan J.D. ( 2010 ) Response of stream fish assemblages to local‐scale habitat as influenced by landscape: a mechanistic investigation of stream fish assemblages. In: Community Ecology of Stream Fishes (Eds K.B. Gido & D.A. Jackson ), pp. 371 – 400. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 73, Bethesda, Maryland.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInfante D.M., Allan J.D., Linke S. & Norris R.H. ( 2008 ) Relationship of fish and macroinvertebrate assemblages to environmental factors: implications for community concordance. Hydrobiologia, 623, 87 – 103.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJensen F.V. ( 1996 ). An Introduction to Bayesian Networks. UCL Press, London.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJerie K., Houshold I. & Peters D. ( 2001 ) Stream diversity and conservation in Tasmania: yet another new approach. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Australian Stream Management Conference, CRC for Catchment Hydrology, Melbourne, Australia pp. 329 – 335.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJerie K., Houshold I. & Peters D. ( 2003 ) Tasmania’s River Geomorphology: Stream Character and Regional Analysis, Vol. 1. Nature Conservation Report 03/5. Nature Conservation Branch, DPIWE, Hobart, Tasmania, 66 pp.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson L.B., Host G.E. ( 2010 ) Recent developments in landscape approaches for the study of aquatic ecosystems. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 29, 41 – 66.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKorb K.B. & Nicholson A.E. ( 2004 ) Bayesian Artificial Intelligence. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, London, 364 pp.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKuikka S., Hilden M., Gislason H., Hansson S., Sparholt H. & Varis O. ( 1999 ) Modeling environmentally driven uncertainties in Baltic cod ( Gadus morhua ) management by Bayesian influence diagrams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 56, 629 – 641.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLammert M. & Allan J.D. ( 1999 ) Assessing biotic integrity of streams: effects of scale in measuring the influence of land use/cover and habitat structure on fish and macroinvertebrates. Environmental Management 23, 257 – 270.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee D.C. & Rieman B.E. ( 1997 ) Population viability assessment of salmonids using probabilistic networks. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 17, 1144 – 1157.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMichigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ). ( 1997 ) Qualitative biological and habitat survey protocols for wadeable streams and rivers. MI/DEQ/SWQ‐96/068.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePaulsen S.G., Mayio A., Peck D.V., Stoddard J.L., Tarquino E. & Holdsworth S.M. et al. ( 2008 ) Condition of stream ecosystems in the US: an overview of the first national assessment. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 27, 812 – 821.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePlowright R.K., Sokolow S.H., Gorman M.E., Daszak P. & Foley J.E. ( 2008 ) Causal inference in disease ecology: investigating ecological drivers of disease emergence. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6, 420 – 429.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePollard A.I. & Yuan L.L. ( 2010 ) Assessing the consistency of response metrics of the invertebrate benthos: a comparison of trait‐ and identify‐based measures. Freshwater Biology 55, 1420 – 1429.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePollino C.A., Woodberry O., Nicholson A., Korb K. & Hart B.T. ( 2007 ) Parameterisation and evaluation of a Bayesian network for use in an ecological risk assessment. Environmental Modelling and Software 22, 1140 – 1152.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePringle C.M. & Triska F.J. ( 2006 ) Effects of nutrient enrichment on periphyton. In: Methods in Stream Ecology (Eds F.H. Hauer & G.A. Lamberti ), pp. 743 – 760. Academic Press, Burlington.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRieman B.E., Peterson J.T., Clayton J., Howell P., Thurow R., Thompson W. et al. ( 2001 ) Evaluation of potential effects of federal land management alternatives on trends of salmonids and their habitats in the interior Columbia River basin. Forest Ecology and Management, 153, 43 – 62.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoth N.E., Allan J.D. & Erickson D.L. ( 1996 ) Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales. Landscape Ecology, 11, 141 – 156.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith B.J., Davies P.E. & Munks S.A. ( 2009 ) Changes in benthic macroinvertebrate communities in upper catchment streams in Tasmania across a gradient of catchment forest operation history. Forest Ecology and Management, 257, 2166 – 2174.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteel E.A., Hughes R.M., Fullerton A.H. et al. ( 2010 ) Are we meeting the challenges of landscape‐scale riverine research? A review. Living Reviews in Landscape Research 4, 1. Available at: http://www.livingreviews.org/lrlr‐2010‐1 (accessed on 14 July 2010).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStewart‐Koster B., Bunn S.E., Mackay S.J., Poff N.L., Naiman R.J. & Lake P.S. ( 2005 ) The use of Bayesian networks to guide investments in flow and catchment restoration for impaired river ecosystems. Freshwater Biology, 55, 243 – 260.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTownsend C.R., Downes B.J., Peacock K. & Arbuckle C.J. ( 2004 ) Scale and the detection of land‐use effects on morphology, vegetation and macroinvertebrate communities of grassland streams. Freshwater Biology, 49, 448 – 462.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUS Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ( 2000 ) The Quality of our Nation’s Waters: a Summary of the National Water Quality Inventory 1998 Report to Congress. EPA 841‐S‐00‐001. Office of Water, Washington, DC.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWebb J.A., Stewardson M.J. & Koster W.M. ( 2010 ) Detecting ecological responses to flow variation using Bayesian hierarchical models. Freshwater Biology, 55, 108 – 126.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYuan L.L. ( 2004 ) Assigning macroinvertebrate tolerance classifications using generalized additive models. Freshwater Biology, 49, 662 – 677.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllan J.D. ( 2004 ) Landscape and riverscapes: the influence of land use on river ecosystems. Annual Reviews of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 35, 257 – 284.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllan J.D. & Castillo M.M. ( 2007 ) Stream Ecology. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceANDRL ( 2008 ) Australian Natural Resources Data Library. Accessed online 24 March 2009 at: http://adl.brs.gov.au.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarbour M.T., Gerritsen J., Snyder B.D. & Stribling J.B. ( 1999 ) Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, 2nd edn. EPA 841‐B‐99‐002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBorsuk M.E., Stow C.A. & Reckhow K.H. ( 2004 ) A Bayesian network of eutrophication models for synthesis, prediction, and uncertainty analysis. Ecological Modelling, 173, 219 – 239.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBott T.L. ( 2006 ) Primary productivity and community respiration. In: Methods in Stream Ecology (Eds F.H. Hauer & G.A. Lamberti ), pp. 663 – 690. Academic Press, Burlington.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurgman M.A. ( 2005 ) Risks and Decisions for Conservation and Environmental Management. Cambridge University Press, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavies P.E. ( 2000 ). Development of a national river bioassessment system (AUSRIVAS) in Australia. In: Assessing the Biological Quality of Freshwaters: RIVPACS and Other Techniques. (Eds J.F. Wright, D.W. Sutcliffe & M.T. Furse ), pp. 113 – 124. Freshwater Biological Association, Cumbria, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavies P.E. & Nelson M. ( 1994 ) Relationships between riparian buffer widths and the effects of logging on stream habitat, invertebrate community composition and fish abundance. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 45, 1289 – 1305.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavies P.E., Cook L.S.J., McIntosh P. & Munks S.A. ( 2005a ) Changes in stream biota along a gradient of logging disturbance, 15 years after logging at Ben Nevis, Tasmania. Forest Ecology and Management, 219, 132 – 148.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavies P.E., McIntosh P., Wapstra M., Bunce S., Cook L.S.J., French B. et al. ( 2005b ) Changes to headwater stream morphology, habitats and riparian vegetation recorded 15 years after pre‐Forest Practices Code forest clearfelling in upland granite terrain, Tasmania, Australia. Forest Ecology and Management 217, 331 – 350.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavies P.E., Harris J.H., Hillman T.J. & Walker K.F. ( 2010 ) The sustainable rivers audit: assessing river ecosystem health in the Murray Darling Basin, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research, 61, 764 – 777.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiana M.J., Allan J.D. & Infante D.M. ( 2006 ) The influence of habitat and land use on fish assemblages of streams in southeastern Michigan. In: Influences of Landscape on Stream Habitats and Biological Assemblages (Eds R.M. Hughes, L. Wang & P.W. Seelbach ), pp. 359 – 374. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 48, Bethesda, MD.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDownes B.J. ( 2010 ) Back to the future: little‐used tools and principles of scientific inference can help disentangle effects of multiple stressors on freshwater ecosystems. Freshwater Biology 55 ( Suppl. 1 ), 60 – 79.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDPIW ( 2008 ) Conservation of Freshwater Ecosystem Values (CFEV) Project Technical Report. Conservation of Freshwater Ecosystem Values Program. Department of Primary Industries and Water, Hobart, Tasmania, 227 pp.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarrand W.R. & Bell D.L. ( 1982 ) Quaternary Geology of Southern Michigan (map). Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrace M.R. & Imberger S.J. ( 2006 ) Stream metabolism: performing & interpreting measurements. Water Studies Centre, Monash University, Murray Darling Basin Commission and New South Wales Department of Environment and Climate Change. 204 pp. Accessed online 1 April 2009 at: http://www.sci.monash.edu.au/wsc/docs/tech‐manual‐v3.pdf.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1365-2427.2011.02683.x.pdf
Size:
847.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.