A Survey of Patients with Inflatable Penile Prostheses: Assessment of Timing and Frequency of Intercourse and Analysis of Implant Durability
dc.contributor.author | Henry, Gerard D. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Brinkman, Mary Jo | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Mead, Susan Fields | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Delk II, John R. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Cleves, Mario A. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Jennermann, Caroline | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wilson, Steven K. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kramer, Andrew C. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-07-12T17:23:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-08-01T14:04:40Z | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2012-06 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Henry, Gerard D.; Brinkman, Mary Jo; Mead, Susan Fields; Delk II, John R.; Cleves, Mario A.; Jennermann, Caroline; Wilson, Steven K.; Kramer, Andrew C. (2012). "A Survey of Patients with Inflatable Penile Prostheses: Assessment of Timing and Frequency of Intercourse and Analysis of Implant Durability." The Journal of Sexual Medicine 9(6). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/92055> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1743-6095 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1743-6109 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/92055 | |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction. This study was conducted to determine how long after inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery patients attempt sexual intercourse and the frequency of subsequent relations. We also examined survival‐related factors for the AMS 700 CX, Mentor Alpha 1, and Mentor Alpha Narrow Base. Aims. The aim was to survey men who received IPPs and collect information about their return to sexual function and frequency of use, and to assess the resilience of their devices. Methods. Phase I involved retrospective chart review of 1,298 virgin IPP surgeries performed by one surgical team from January 1992 to December 1998. Phase II included 330 subjects selected by stratified, systematic, random sampling from phase I patients. Data were collected by computer‐assisted telephone interview, using a 27‐question survey. All patients had been instructed to wait 4 weeks before using the implant and were taught how to inflate/deflate their prostheses at the 4‐week postsurgical visits. Main Outcome Measures. The survey examines the length of time after surgery for men to resume sexual function. In the same study, information was garnered about mechanical durability of the device. Results. Among phase I subjects, the 5‐year survival rate was 83% (N = 1,069) for IPP revision for any reason. Of the 330 phase II subjects, 248 (75%) were successfully contacted; 199 (80%) responded to the full survey and 49 (20%) responded to selected parts of the survey. Sexual intercourse was resumed postoperatively at 1–4 weeks for 41% (78/190), at 5–6 weeks for 31% (59/190), at 7–8 weeks for 16% (30/190), and at >8 weeks for 12% (23/190) of the patients. More than 60% of patients reported using their IPP at least once weekly. Conclusion. The three‐piece IPP has excellent 5‐year survival rates. Most patients return to sexual activity relatively quickly, with high frequency of usage of their prostheses. Henry GD, Brinkman MJ, Mead SF, Delk JR II, Cleves MA, Jennermann C, Wilson SK, and Kramer AC. A survey of patients with inflatable penile prostheses: Assessment of timing and frequency of intercourse and analysis of implant durability. J Sex Med 2012;9:1715–1721. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Inc | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | en_US |
dc.subject.other | IPP Survival | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Impotence | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Penile Prosthesis | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Outcomes | en_US |
dc.title | A Survey of Patients with Inflatable Penile Prostheses: Assessment of Timing and Frequency of Intercourse and Analysis of Implant Durability | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Urology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Regional Urology, Shreveport, LA, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Health Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Institute for Urologic Excellence, Indigo, CA, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/92055/1/j.1743-6109.2012.02729.x.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02729.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | The Journal of Sexual Medicine | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kramer AC, Schweber A. Patient expectations prior to coloplast titan penile prosthesis implant predicts postoperative satisfaction. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 2261 – 6. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bettocchi C, Palumbo F, Spilotros M, Lucarelli G, Palazzo S, Battaglia M, Selvaggi FP, Ditonno P. Patient and partner satisfaction after AMS inflatable penile prosthesis implant. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 304 – 9. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hassan A, El‐Hadidy M, El‐Deeck BS, Mostafa T. Couple satisfaction to different therapeutic modalities for organic erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med 2008; 5: 2381 – 91. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Akin‐Olugbade O, Parker M, Guhring P, Mulhall J. Determinants of patient satisfaction following penile prosthesis surgery. J Sex Med 2006; 3: 743 – 8. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lux M, Reyes‐Vallejo L, Morgentaler A, Levine LA. Outcomes and satisfaction rates for the redesigned 2‐piece penile prosthesis. J Urol 2007; 177: 262 – 6. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Brinkman MJ, Henry GD, Wilson SK, Delk JR 2nd, Denny GA, Young M, Cleves MA. A survey of patients with inflatable penile prostheses for satisfaction. J Urol 2005; 174: 253 – 7. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fisher WA, Rosen RC, Eardley I, Sand M, Goldstein I. Sexual experience of female partners of men with erectile dysfunction: The female experience of men's attitudes to life events and sexuality (FEMALES) study. J Sex Med 2005; 2: 675 – 84. Erratum in: J Sex Med 3: 189, 2006. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Carson CC, Mulcahy JJ, Govier FE. Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction outcomes of the AMS 700 CX inflatable penile prosthesis: Results of a long‐term, multicenter study. J Urol 2000; 164: 376 – 80. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hellstrom WJ, Montague DK, Moncada I, Carson C, Minhas S, Faria G, Krishnamurti S. Implants, mechanical devices, and vascular surgery for erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 501 – 23. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Goldstein I, Newman L, Baum N, Brooks M, Chaikin L, Goldberg K, McBride A, Krane RJ. Safety and efficacy outcome of mentor alpha‐1 inflatable penile prosthesis implantation for impotence treatment. J Urol 1997; 157: 833 – 9. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ferguson KH, Cespedes RD. Prospective long‐term results and quality‐of‐life assessment after Dura‐II penile prosthesis placement. Urology 2003; 61: 437 – 41. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Parsons CL. Subclinical infection of penile prostheses. Infect Urol 1995; 8: 148 – 50. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Jarow JP. Risk factors for penile prosthetic infection. J Urol 1996; 156: 402 – 4. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gittens P, Moskovic DJ, Avila D Jr, Chandrashekar A, Khera M, Lipshultz LI. Favorable female sexual function is associated with patient satisfaction after inflatable penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med 2011; 8: 1996 – 2001. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wilson SK, Delk JR. Inflatable penile implant infection: Predisposing factors and treatment suggestions. J Urol 1995; 153: 659 – 61. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wilson SK, Wahman GE, Lange JL. Eleven years of experience with the inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1988; 139: 951 – 2. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kelly GF. Sexuality today: The human perspective. 4th edition. Guilford, CT: The Dushkin Publishing Group; 1994. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cleves MA, Gould WW, Gutierrez RG. An introduction to survival analysis using STATA. College Station, Texas: Stata Press; 2002: 51 – 69, 93–102, 113–115. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wilson SK, Cleves MA, Delk JR. Comparison of mechanical reliability of original and enhanced Mentor Alpha 1 penile prosthesis. J Urol 1999; 162: 715 – 8. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Salama N. Satisfaction with the malleable penile prosthesis among couples from the Middle East—is it different from that reported elsewhere? Int J Impot Res 2004; 16: 175 – 80. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Krauss DJ, Lantinga LJ, Carey MP, Meisler AW, Kelly CM. Use of the malleable penile prosthesis in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: A prospective study of postoperative adjustment. J Urol 1989; 142: 988 – 91. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Brody S, Costa RM. Satisfaction (sexual, life, relationship, and mental health) is associated directly with penile‐vaginal intercourse, but inversely with other sexual behavior frequencies. J Sex Med 2009; 6: 1947 – 54. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.