Show simple item record

Hydrogel Expandable Coils for Vascular Occlusion in Congenital Cardiovascular Disease: A Single Center Experience

dc.contributor.authorGoldstein, Bryan H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAiyagari, Ranjiten_US
dc.contributor.authorBocks, Martin L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, Aimee K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-12T17:24:06Z
dc.date.available2013-07-01T14:33:05Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationGoldstein, Bryan H.; Aiyagari, Ranjit; Bocks, Martin L.; Armstrong, Aimee K. (2012). "Hydrogel Expandable Coils for Vascular Occlusion in Congenital Cardiovascular Disease: A Single Center Experience." Congenital Heart Disease 7(3). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/92067>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1747-079Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1747-0803en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/92067
dc.description.abstractObjective.  The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the AZUR hydrogel‐polymer coated platinum coil (hydrocoil) for vascular occlusion in patients with congenital cardiovascular disease (CCVD). Design.  Retrospective case review. Patients.  Eight patients with CCVD who underwent attempted vascular occlusion procedure with the hydrocoil at the University of Michigan between January 1, 2008 and March 1, 2011. Median patient age was 1.6 years (range 0.6–27.5 years) and median weight was 10.6 kg (3.9–74.8 kg). Outcome Measures.  Complete vascular occlusion of the target vessel was assessed at procedural completion with angiography and noninvasive imaging at follow‐up. Key procedural variables and adverse events were also evaluated. Results.  A total of 21 hydrocoils were successfully placed in seven vessels, in six patients. Vessels included four (57%) veno‐venous collaterals, two (29%) aortopulmonary collaterals, and one (14%) main pulmonary artery. Hydrocoils could not be placed successfully in two patients, including one baffle leak and one veno‐venous collateral. Pretreatment of the hydrocoil with steam to soften the coil, prior to vascular introduction, increased the likelihood of successful implant (100% vs. 60%). Complete occlusion was observed in 100% of vessels either at the time of catheterization or at follow‐up. There were no complications attributable to the hydrocoil. Conclusions.  Hydrocoils are safe and effective devices that can be utilized for vascular occlusion in a variety of blood vessels in patients with CCVD. Coil pretreatment may increase the likelihood of procedural success.en_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherPediatric Interventionsen_US
dc.subject.otherCoilen_US
dc.subject.otherEmbolizationen_US
dc.subject.otherCollateralsen_US
dc.subject.otherCongenital Heart Diseaseen_US
dc.titleHydrogel Expandable Coils for Vascular Occlusion in Congenital Cardiovascular Disease: A Single Center Experienceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pediatrics, C. S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/92067/1/j.1747-0803.2011.00583.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1747-0803.2011.00583.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceCongenital Heart Diseaseen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Aneurysm packing with HydroCoil Embolic System versus platinum coils: initial clinical experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004; 25: 60 – 62.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite PM, Lewis SC, Nahser H, Sellar RJ, Goddard T, Gholkar A. HydroCoil Endovascular Aneurysm Occlusion and Packing Study (HELPS trial): procedural safety and operator‐assessed efficacy results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008; 29: 217 – 223.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrifka RG, Fenrich AL, Tapio JB. Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus and aorto‐pulmonary vessels using non‐ferromagnetic Inconel MReye embolization coils. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008; 72: 691 – 695.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePorstmann W, Wierny L, Warnke H. Closure of persistent ductus arteriosus without thoracotomy. Ger Med Mon. 1967; 12: 259 – 261.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGudausky TM, Hirsch R, Khoury PR, Beekman RH, III. Comparison of two transcatheter device strategies for occlusion of the patent ductus arteriosus. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008; 72: 675 – 680.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrunetti MA, Ringel R, Owada C, et al. Percutaneous closure of patent ductus arteriosus: a multiinstitutional registry comparing multiple devices. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 76: 696 – 702.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwartz M, Glatz AC, Rome JJ, Gillespie MJ. The Amplatzer vascular plug and Amplatzer vascular plug II for vascular occlusion procedures in 50 patients with congenital cardiovascular disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010; 76: 411 – 417.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHill SL, Hijazi ZM, Hellenbrand WE, Cheatham JP. Evaluation of the AMPLATZER vascular plug for embolization of peripheral vascular malformations associated with congenital heart disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006; 67: 113 – 119.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePass RH, Hijazi Z, Hsu DT, Lewis V, Hellenbrand WE. Multicenter USA Amplatzer patent ductus arteriosus occlusion device trial: initial and one‐year results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44: 513 – 519.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Hare AM, Fanning NF, Ti JP, Dunne R, Brennan PR, Thornton JM. HydroCoils, occlusion rates, and outcomes: a large single‐center study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010; 31: 1917 – 1922.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKallmes DF, Fujiwara NH. New expandable hydrogel‐platinum coil hybrid device for aneurysm embolization. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002; 23: 1580 – 1588.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDing YH, Dai D, Lewis DA, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Angiographic and histologic analysis of experimental aneurysms embolized with platinum coils, Matrix, and HydroCoil. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005; 26: 1757 – 1763.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKiller M, Arthur AS, Barr JD, Richling B, Cruise GM. Histomorphology of thrombus organization, neointima formation, and foreign body response in retrieved human aneurysms treated with hydrocoil devices. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010; 94: 486 – 492.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSluzewski M, van Rooij WJ, Slob MJ, Bescos JO, Slump CH, Wijnalda D. Relation between aneurysm volume, packing, and compaction in 145 cerebral aneurysms treated with coils. Radiology. 2004; 231: 653 – 658.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGunnarsson T, Tong FC, Klurfan P, Cawley CM, Dion JE. Angiographic and clinical outcomes in 200 consecutive patients with cerebral aneurysm treated with hydrogel‐coated coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009; 30: 1657 – 1664.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbdel‐Aal AK, Osman S, Hamed MF, Saddekni S, Saad WE. Embolization of bleeding duodenal ulcer using amplatzer vascular plug II and hydrogel coils: case report. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2011; 45: 307 – 310.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.