Show simple item record

Examining the pathways linking lower socioeconomic status and advanced melanoma

dc.contributor.authorPollitt, Ricardo A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSwetter, Susan M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Timothy M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPatil, Pratimaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGeller, Alan C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-09T14:54:34Z
dc.date.available2013-10-01T17:06:31Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-08-15en_US
dc.identifier.citationPollitt, Ricardo A.; Swetter, Susan M.; Johnson, Timothy M.; Patil, Pratima; Geller, Alan C. (2012). "Examining the pathways linking lower socioeconomic status and advanced melanoma ." Cancer 118(16): 4004-4013. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/92359>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0008-543Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/92359
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND. Low socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with more advanced melanoma at diagnosis and decreased survival. Exploring the pathways linking lower SES and thicker melanoma will help guide public and professional strategies to reduce deaths. METHODS. The authors surveyed 566 newly diagnosed patients at Stanford University Medical Center, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, and University of Michigan. SES was assessed by education level (high school/general education degree or less [HS], associate/technical school degree, or ≥college graduate). All data was obtained by self‐report among patients within three months of their diagnosis. RESULTS. HS‐educated individuals were significantly more likely than college graduates to believe that melanoma was not very serious (odds ratio [OR], 2.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.79‐4.71) and were less likely to know the asymmetry, borders (irregular), color (variegated), and diameter (>6 mm) (ABCD) melanoma rule or the difference between melanoma and ordinary skin growths (OR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.23‐0.52] and 0.26 [95% CI, 0.16‐0.41] respectively). Physicians were less likely to have ever told HS‐educated versus college‐educated individuals they were at risk for skin cancer (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.31‐0.71) or instructed them on how to examine their skin for signs of melanoma (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.25‐0.63). HS‐educated individuals were less likely to have received a physician skin examination within the year before diagnosis (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37‐0.80). CONCLUSIONS. Decreased melanoma risk perception and knowledge among low‐SES individuals and decreased physician communication regarding skin examinations of these individuals may be key components of the consistently observed socioeconomic gradient in mortality. The current findings suggest the need to raise melanoma awareness among lower‐SES patients and to increase physician awareness of socioeconomic disparities in clinical communication and care. Cancer 2012. © 2011 American Cancer Society. The authors examined several potential pathways that may play a role in the previously described socioeconomic disparity in melanoma stage at diagnosis and survival. Less educated melanoma patients have little awareness of the risks of melanoma and less basic knowledge about melanoma detection, and they receive less physician communication about melanoma risk factors and screening and fewer physician skin examinations than more educated patients.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherDetectionen_US
dc.subject.otherSocial Classen_US
dc.subject.otherEpidemiologyen_US
dc.subject.otherEducationen_US
dc.subject.otherScreeningen_US
dc.subject.otherMelanomaen_US
dc.titleExamining the pathways linking lower socioeconomic status and advanced melanomaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartments of Dermatology, Otolaryngology, and Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHarvard School of Public Health, Kresge Building Room 701A, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston MA 02215en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherRicardo Pollitt's current address: Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Californiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Society, Human Development, and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusettsen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDermatology Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Californiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Dermatology, Pigmented Lesion and Melanoma Program, Stanford University Medical Center and Cancer Institute, Stanford, Californiaen_US
dc.identifier.pmid22179775en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/92359/1/26706_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.26706en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCanceren_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeller AC, Swetter SM, Brooks K, Demierre MF, Yaroch AL. Screening, early detection, and trends for melanoma: current status (2000‐2006) and future directions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007; 57: 555 ‐ 572; quiz 573 ‐ 556.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Durme DJ, Ferrante JM, Pal N, Wathington D, Roetzheim RG, Gonzalez EC. Demographic predictors of melanoma stage at diagnosis. Arch Fam Med. 2000; 9: 606 ‐ 611.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinos E, Swetter SM, Cockburn MG, Colditz GA, Clarke CA. Increasing burden of melanoma in the United States. J Invest Dermatol. 2009; 129: 1666 ‐ 1674.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwetter SM, Pollitt RA, Johnson MJ, Brooks DR, Geller AC. Behavioral determinants of successful early melanoma detection: role of self and physician skin examination. Cancer. 2012; 118 3725: 3734 ‐ 000.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeller AC, Johnson TM, Miller DR, Brooks KR, Layton CJ, Swetter SM. Factors associated with physician discovery of early melanoma in middle‐aged and older men. Arch Dermatol. 2009; 145: 409 ‐ 414.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYoul PH, Baade PD, Parekh S, English D, Elwood M, Aitken JF. Association between melanoma thickness, clinical skin examination and socioeconomic status: results of a large population‐based study. Int J Cancer. 2011; 128: 2158 ‐ 2165.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePollitt RA, Geller AC, Brooks DR, Johnson TM, Park ER, Swetter SM. Efficacy of skin self‐examination practices for early melanoma detection. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009; 18: 3018 ‐ 3023.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiberatos P, Link BG, Kelsey JL. The measurement of social class in epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev. 1988; 10: 87 ‐ 121.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKleinbaum DG, Kupper LK, Muller KE, Nizam A. Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company; 1998.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAitken JF, Elwood M, Baade PD, Youl P, English D. Clinical whole‐body skin examination reduces the incidence of thick melanomas. Int J Cancer. 2010; 126: 450 ‐ 458.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReyes‐Ortiz CA, Goodwin JS, Freeman JL, Kuo YF. Socioeconomic status and survival in older patients with melanoma. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006; 54: 1758 ‐ 1764.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeller AC, Miller DR, Lew RA, Clapp RW, Wenneker MB, Koh HK. Cutaneous melanoma mortality among the socioeconomically disadvantaged in Massachusetts. Am J Public Health. 1996; 86: 538 ‐ 543.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePollitt RA, Clarke CA, Shema SJ, Swetter SM. California Medicaid enrollment and melanoma stage at diagnosis: a population‐based study. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35: 7 ‐ 13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaumert J, Plewig G, Volkenandt M, Schmid‐Wendtner MH. Factors associated with a high tumour thickness in patients with melanoma. Br J Dermatol. 2007; 156: 938 ‐ 944.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTemoshok L, DiClemente RJ, Sweet DM, Blois MS, Sagebiel RW. Factors related to patient delay in seeking medical attention for cutaneous malignant melanoma. Cancer. 1984; 54: 3048 ‐ 3053.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller DR, Geller AC, Wyatt SW, et al. Melanoma awareness and self‐examination practices: results of a United States survey. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996; 34: 962 ‐ 970.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAizer A, Stroud L. Education, Knowledge and the Evolution of Disparities in Health: Working Paper 15840. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2010.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKenkel DS. Health behavior, health knowledge, and schooling. J Political Econ. 1991; 99: 287 ‐ 305.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAitken JF, Janda M, Lowe JB, et al. Prevalence of whole‐body skin self‐examination in a population at high risk for skin cancer (Australia). Cancer Causes Control. 2004; 15: 453 ‐ 463.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollins M, Kelsberg G, Safranek S, Van Durme DJ. Clinical inquiries. Is training patients in self‐examination an effective way to screen for melanoma? J Fam Pract. 2008; 57: 336 ‐ 337.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerwick M, Begg CB, Fine JA, Roush GC, Barnhill RL. Screening for cutaneous melanoma by skin self‐examination. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996; 88: 17 ‐ 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTeutsch C. Patient‐doctor communication. Med Clin North Am. 2003; 87: 1115 ‐ 1145.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWillems S, De Maesschalck S, Deveugele M, Derese A, De Maeseneer J. Socio‐economic status of the patient and doctor‐patient communication: does it make a difference? Patient Educ Couns. 2005; 56: 139 ‐ 146.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStreet RL Jr, Haidet P. How well do doctors know their patients? Factors affecting physician understanding of patients' health beliefs. J Gen Intern Med. 2011; 26: 21 ‐ 27.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStreet RL Jr, Gordon HS, Ward MM, Krupat E, Kravitz RL. Patient participation in medical consultations: why some patients are more involved than others. Med Care. 2005; 43: 960 ‐ 969.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGage E. Examining the most relevant conceptualization of the socioeconomic status construct for cancer research [serial online]. Cancer Nurs. 2010; 33: E1 ‐ E9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStreet RL Jr. Gender differences in health care provider‐patient communication: are they due to style, stereotypes, or accommodation? Patient Educ Couns. 2002; 48: 201 ‐ 206.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYe J, Xu Z, Aladesanmi O. Provider recommendation for colorectal cancer screening: examining the role of patients' socioeconomic status and health insurance. Cancer Epidemiol. 2009; 33: 207 ‐ 211.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDoubeni CA, Laiyemo AO, Reed G, Field TS, Fletcher RH. Socioeconomic and racial patterns of colorectal cancer screening among Medicare enrollees in 2000 to 2005. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009; 18: 2170 ‐ 2175.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCaffery K, Wardle J, Nadel M, Atkin W. Socioeconomic variation in participation in colorectal cancer screening. J Med Screen. 2002; 9: 104 ‐ 108.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWardle J, McCaffery K, Nadel M, Atkin W. Socioeconomic differences in cancer screening participation: comparing cognitive and psychosocial explanations. Soc Sci Med. 2004; 59: 249 ‐ 261.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClegg LX, Reichman ME, Miller BA, et al. Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: selected findings from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results: National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Cancer Causes Control. 2009; 20: 417 ‐ 435.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZell JA, Cinar P, Mobasher M, Ziogas A, Meyskens FL Jr, Anton‐Culver H. Survival for patients with invasive cutaneous melanoma among ethnic groups: the effects of socioeconomic status and treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 66 ‐ 75.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrtiz CA, Goodwin JS, Freeman JL. The effect of socioeconomic factors on incidence, stage at diagnosis and survival of cutaneous melanoma. Med Sci Monit. 2005; 11: RA163 ‐ RA172.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.