View Item 

Show simple item record

Effects of modes of cockpit automation on pilot performance and workload in a next generation flight concept of operation
dc.contributor.authorGil, Guk‐hoen_US
dc.contributor.authorKaber, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorKaufmann, Karlen_US
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sang‐hwanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-09T14:55:59Z
dc.date.available2013-10-18T17:47:30Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationGil, Guk‐ho ; Kaber, David; Kaufmann, Karl; Kim, Sang‐hwan (2012). "Effects of modes of cockpit automation on pilot performance and workload in a next generation flight concept of operation." Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries 22(5): 395-406. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/92410>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1090-8471en_US
dc.identifier.issn1520-6564en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/92410
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to compare the effects of various forms of advanced cockpit automation for flight planning on pilot performance and workload under a futuristic concept of operation. A lab experiment was conducted in which airline pilots flew simulated tailored arrivals to an airport using three modes of automation (MOAs), including a control‐display unit (CDU) to the aircraft flight management system, an enhanced CDU (CDU+), and a continuous descent approach (CDA) tool. The arrival scenario required replanning to avoid convective activity and was constrained by a minimum fuel requirement at the initial approach fix. The CDU and CDU+ modes allowed for point‐by‐point path planning or selection among multiple standard arrivals, respectively. The CDA mode completely automated the route replanning for pilots. It was expected that the higher‐level automation would significantly reduce pilot workload and improve overall flight performance. In general, results indicated that the MOAs influenced pilot performance and workload responses according to hypotheses. This study provides new knowledge about the relationship of cockpit automation and interface features with pilot performance and workload in a novel next generation–style flight concept of operation. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherFlight Simulationen_US
dc.subject.otherCognitive Workloaden_US
dc.subject.otherNextGenen_US
dc.subject.otherLevel of Automationen_US
dc.subject.otherModes of Automationen_US
dc.subject.otherCockpit Automationen_US
dc.titleEffects of modes of cockpit automation on pilot performance and workload in a next generation flight concept of operationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering, University of Michigan‐Dearborn, Dearborn, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherEdward P. Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolinaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherEdward P. Fitts Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695‐7906. Phone: 919‐515‐0312en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/92410/1/20377_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/hfm.20377en_US
dc.identifier.sourceHuman Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industriesen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaber, D. B., Riley, J. M., Lampton, D., & Endsley, M. R. ( 2005 ). Measuring situation awareness in a virtual urban environment for dismounted infantry training. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human‐Computer Interaction (Vol. 9, “Advances in Virtual Environments Technology: Musings on Design, Evaluation, & Applications”). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoeing ( 2008 ). Statistical summary of commercial jet airplane accidents. Available at: http://www.boeing.comen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen, T. L., & Pritchett, A. R. ( 2001 ). Development and evaluation of a cockpit decision‐aid for emergency trajectory generation. Journal of Aircraft, 38 ( 5 ), 935 – 943.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoppenbarger, R., Mead, R., & Sweet, D. ( 2007 ). Field evaluation of the tailored arrivals concept for datalink‐enabled continuous descent approach. In Proceedings of the 7th American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Conference (ATIO). Belfast, Northern Ireland.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCummings, M. L., Myers, K., & Scott, S. D. ( 2006 ). Modified Cooper Harper evaluation tool for unmanned vehicle displays. In Proceedings of the Unmanned Vehicle Systems Canada Conference. Montebello, Canada.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDao, A., Lachter, J., Battiste, V., Brandt, S. L., Vu, K. P., Strybel, T. Z., et al.( 2010 ). Automated spacing support tools for interval management operations during continuous descent approaches. In Proceedings of the 54th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (HFES) (pp. 21 – 25 ). Santa Monica, CA: HFES.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEndsley, M. R., & Kaber, D. B. ( 1999 ). Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Ergonomics, 42, 462 – 492.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEndsley, M. R., & Strauch, B. ( 1997 ). Automation and situation awareness: The accident at Cali, Colombia. In R. S. Jensen & L. Rakovan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 877 – 881 ). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarper, R. P., & Cooper, G. E. ( 1986 ). Handling qualities and pilot evaluation. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 9 ( 5 ), 515 – 529.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. ( 1988 ). Development of NASA‐TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human Mental Workload (pp. 5 – 39 ). New York: Elsevier.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones, D. G., & Endsley, M. R. ( 2004 ). Use of real‐time probes for measuring situation awareness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 14 ( 4 ), 343 – 367.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaber, D., Perry, C., Segall, N., & Sheik‐Nainar, M. ( 2007 ). Workload state classification with automation during simulated air traffic control. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 17 ( 4 ), 371 – 390.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaber, D. B., Gil, G. H., Kaufmann, K., Kim, S. H., Veil, T., & Picciano, P. ( 2009 ). Effects of modes of cockpit automation on pilot performance and workload in a high workload approach and landing scenario. Poster presentation at the 15th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (CD‐ROM). Dayton, OH: Wright State University.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKalambi, V. V., Pritchett, A. R., Bruneau, D. P. K., Endsley, M. R., & Kaber, D. B. ( 2007 ). In‐flight planning and intelligent pilot aids for emergencies and non‐nominal flight conditions using automatically generated flight plans. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 51 st Annual Meeting (CD‐ROM). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors & Ergonomics Society.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoroney, W. F., Biers, D. W., & Eggemeier, F. T. ( 1995 ). Some measurement and methodological considerations in the application of subjective workload and measurement techniques. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 5, 87 – 106.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRye, K., & Myung, R. ( 2004 ). Evaluation of mental workload with a combined measure based on physiological indices during a dual task of tracking and mental arithmetic. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35, 991 – 1009.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSarter, N. B., & Woods, D. D. ( 1995 ). How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control. Human Factors, 37 ( 1 ), 5 – 19.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWard, N. J. ( 2000 ). Automation of task processes: An example of intelligent transportation systems. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 10 ( 4 ), 395 – 408.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWright, M. C., Kaber, D. B., & Endsley, M. R. ( 2003 ). Performance and situation awareness effects of levels of automation in an advanced commercial aircraft flight simulation. In Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Dayton, OH: Wright State University, 1277 – 1282.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
20377_ftp.pdf
Size:
1010.KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.