View Item 

Show simple item record

Evidence‐based guideline: Neuromuscular ultrasound for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome
dc.contributor.authorFrench, Catherineen_US
dc.contributor.authorCartwright, Michael S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHobson‐webb, Lisa D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBoon, Andrea J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAlter, Katharine E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHunt, Christopher H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFlores, Victor H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWerner, Robert A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorShook, Steven J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorThomas, T. Darrellen_US
dc.contributor.authorPrimack, Scott J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWalker, Francis O.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-09T14:56:58Z
dc.date.available2013-10-01T17:06:32Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationFrench, Catherine; Cartwright, Michael S.; Hobson‐webb, Lisa D. ; Boon, Andrea J.; Alter, Katharine E.; Hunt, Christopher H.; Flores, Victor H.; Werner, Robert A.; Shook, Steven J.; Thomas, T. Darrell; Primack, Scott J.; Walker, Francis O. (2012). "Evidenceâ based guideline: Neuromuscular ultrasound for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome ." Muscle & Nerve 46(2): 287-293. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/92446>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0148-639Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-4598en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/92446
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The purpose of this study was to develop an evidence‐based guideline for the use of neuromuscular ultrasound in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods: Two questions were asked: (1) What is the accuracy of median nerve cross‐sectional area enlargement as measured with ultrasound for the diagnosis of CTS? (2) What added value, if any, does neuromuscular ultrasound provide over electrodiagnostic studies alone for the diagnosis of CTS? A systematic review was performed, and studies were classified according to American Academy of Neurology criteria for rating articles of diagnostic accuracy (question 1) and for screening articles (question 2). Results: Neuromuscular ultrasound measurement of median nerve cross‐sectional area at the wrist is accurate and may be offered as a diagnostic test for CTS (Level A). Neuromuscular ultrasound probably adds value to electrodiagnostic studies when diagnosing CTS and should be considered in screening for structural abnormalities at the wrist in those with CTS (Level B). Muscle Nerve 46: 287–293, 2012en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherMedian Nerveen_US
dc.subject.otherCarpal Tunnel Syndromeen_US
dc.subject.otherMononeuropathyen_US
dc.subject.otherNerve Conduction Studiesen_US
dc.subject.otherUltrasounden_US
dc.titleEvidence‐based guideline: Neuromuscular ultrasound for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndromeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherMount Washington Pediatric Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston‐Salem, North Carolina, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Medicine, Division of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherKnoxville Neurology Specialists, Knoxville, Tennessee, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNeuromuscular Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherPhysical Medicine Associates, Arlington, Texas, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherRehabilitation Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherAANEM, 2621 Superior Drive NW, Rochester, MN 55901en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherColorado Rehabilitation and Occupational Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/92446/1/23389_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/mus.23389en_US
dc.identifier.sourceMuscle & Nerveen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZiswiler HR, Reichenbach S, Vogelin E, Bachmann LM, Villiger PM, Juni P. Diagnostic value of sonography in patients with suspected carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective study. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 52: 304 – 311.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePinilla I, Martin‐Hervas C, Sordo G, Santiago S. The usefulness of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2008; 33: 435 – 439.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSernik RA, Abicalaf CA, Pimentel BF, Braga‐Baiak A, Braga L, Cerri GG. Ultrasound features of carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective case‐control study. Skeletal Radiol 2008; 37: 49 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwen WA, Jacobs JW, Bussemaker FE, de Waard JW, Bijlsma JW. Carpal tunnel sonography by the rheumatologist versus nerve conduction study by the neurologist. J Rheumatol 2001; 28: 62 – 69.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVisser LH, Smidt MH, Lee ML. High‐resolution sonography versus EMG in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008; 79: 63 – 67.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang LY, Leong CP, Huang YC, Hung JW, Cheung SM, Pong YP. Best diagnostic criterion in high‐resolution ultrasonography for carpal tunnel syndrome. Chang Gung Med J 2008; 31: 469 – 476.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuchberger W, Judmaier W, Birbamer G, Lener M, Schmidauer C. Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnosis with high‐resolution sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 159: 793 – 798.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuchberger W, Schon G, Strasser K, Jungwirth W. High‐resolution ultrasonography of the carpal tunnel. J Ultrasound Med 1991; 10: 531 – 537.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHammer HB, Hovden IA, Haavardsholm EA, Kvien TK. Ultrasonography shows increased cross‐sectional area of the median nerve in patients with arthritis and carpal tunnel syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006; 45: 584 – 588.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHobson‐Webb LD, Massey JM, Juel VC, Sanders DB. The ultrasonographic wrist‐to‐forearm median nerve area ratio in carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 119: 1353 – 1357.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMallouhi A, Pulzl P, Trieb T, Piza H, Bodner G. Predictors of carpal tunnel syndrome: accuracy of gray‐scale and color Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186: 1240 – 1245.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNakamichi KI, Tachibana S. Enlarged median nerve in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 2000; 23: 1713 – 1718.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceColak A, Kutlay M, Pekkafali Z, Saracoglu M, Demircan N, Simsek H, et al. Use of sonography in carpal tunnel syndrome surgery. A prospective study. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2007; 47: 109 – 115.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDomanasiewicz A, Koszewicz M, Jablecki J. Comparison of the diagnostic value of ultrasonography and neurography in carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2009; 43: 433 – 438.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMondelli M, Filippou G, Gallo A, Frediani B. Diagnostic utility of ultrasonography versus nerve conduction studies in mild carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 2008; 59: 357 – 366.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoran L, Perez M, Esteban A, Bellon J, Arranz B, del Cerro M. Sonographic measurement of cross‐sectional area of the median nerve in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: correlation with nerve conduction studies. J Clin Ultrasound 2009; 37: 125 – 131.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNaranjo A, Ojeda S, Mendoza D, Francisco F, Quevedo JC, Erausquin C. What is the diagnostic value of ultrasonography compared to physical evaluation in patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome? Clin Exp Rheumatol 2007; 25: 853 – 859.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePadua L, Pazzaglia C, Caliandro P, Granata G, Foschini M, Briani C, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: ultrasound, neurophysiology, clinical and patient‐oriented assessment. Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 119: 2064 – 2069.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAltinok T, Baysal O, Karakas HM, Sigirci A, Alkan A, Kayhan A, et al. Ultrasonographic assessment of mild and moderate idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Radiol 2004; 59: 916 – 925.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWong SM, Griffith JF, Hui AC, Lo SK, Fu M, Wong KS. Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnostic usefulness of sonography. Radiology 2004; 232: 93 – 99.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMohammadi A, Afshar A, Etemadi A, Masoudi S, Baghizadeh A. Diagnostic value of cross‐sectional area of median nerve in grading severity of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Iran Med 2010; 13: 516 – 521.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNakamichi K, Tachibana S. Ultrasonographic measurement of median nerve cross‐sectional area in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnostic accuracy. Muscle Nerve 2002; 26: 798 – 803.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlauser AS, Halpern EJ, Faschingbauer R, Guerra F, Martinoli C, Gabl MF, et al. Bifid median nerve in carpal tunnel syndrome: assessment with US cross‐sectional area measurement. Radiology 2011; 259: 808 – 815.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNakamichi K, Tachibana S. Unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome and space‐occupying lesions. J Hand Surg Br 1993; 18: 748 – 749.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIannicelli E, Chianta GA, Salvini V, Almberger M, Monacelli G, Passariello R. Evaluation of bifid median nerve with sonography and MR imaging. J Ultrasound Med 2000; 19: 481 – 485.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePadua L, Liotta G, Di Pascuale A, Granata G, Pazzaglia C, Caliandro P, et al. Contribution of ultrasound in the assessment of nerve diseases. Eur J Neurol 2012; 19: 47 – 54.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBertolotto M, Rosenberg I, Parodi RC, Perrone R, Gentile S, Rollandi GA, et al. Case report: Fibroma of tendon sheath in the distal forearm with associated median nerve neuropathy: US, CT and MR appearances. Clin Radiol 1996; 51: 370 – 372.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElsaidi GA, Wiesler ER. Lipofibromatous hamartoma of the median nerve: case presentation of MRI, ultrasound, electrodiagnostic, histologic, and surgical findings. Am J Orthop 2004; 33: 514 – 516.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHobson‐Webb LD, Walker FO. Traumatic neuroma diagnosed by ultrasonography. Arch Neurol 2004; 61: 1322 – 1323.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKato H, Ogino T, Nanbu T, Nakamura K. Compression neuropathy of the motor branch of the median nerve caused by palmar ganglion. J Hand Surg Am 1991; 16: 751 – 752.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKele H, Verheggen R, Reimers CD. Carpal tunnel syndrome caused by thrombosis of the median artery: the importance of high‐resolution ultrasonography for diagnosis. Case report. J Neurosurg 2002; 97: 471 – 473.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKobayashi N, Koshino T, Nakazawa A, Saito T. Neuropathy of motor branch of median or ulnar nerve induced by midpalm ganglion. J Hand Surg Am 2001; 26: 474 – 477.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKuo YL, Yao WJ, Chiu HY. Role of sonography in the preoperative assessment of neurilemmoma. J Clin Ultrasound 2005; 33: 87 – 89.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNakamichi K, Tachibana S. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome caused by an occult ganglion. J Hand Surg Br 1993; 18: 174 – 175.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePadua L, Aprile I, Pazzaglia C, Frasca G, Caliandro P, Tonali P, et al. Contribution of ultrasound in a neurophysiological lab in diagnosing nerve impairment: a one‐year systematic assessment. Clin Neurophysiol 2007; 118: 1410 – 1416.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnna LG, Di Pasquale A, Lucchetta M, Alberti MA, Padua L. Ultrasound view of a traumatic two‐level median nerve lesion. Muscle Nerve 2011; 43: 767 – 768.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen KH, Lee KF, Hsu HC, Huang WC, Hsiao KY, Fang KM. The role of high‐resolution ultrasound in the diagnosis of a traumatic neuroma in an injured median nerve. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 88: 771 – 774.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen P, Massengill A, Maklad N, Roder E. Nerve territory‐oriented macrodactyly: unusual cause of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Ultrasound Med 1996; 15: 661 – 664.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeclercq H, De Man R, van Herck G, Tanghe W, Lateur L. Case report 814: Fibrolipoma of the median nerve. Skeletal Radiol 1993; 22: 610 – 613.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFumiere E, Dugardeyn C, Roquet ME, Delcour C. US demonstration of a thrombosed persistent median artery in carpal tunnel syndrome. JBR‐BTR 2002; 85: 1 – 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHui AC, Wong SM, Griffith JF. An unusual cause of carpal tunnel syndrome. Int J Clin Pract 2003; 57: 635 – 636.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKara M, Erkin G, Malas FU, Kaymak B, Uysal H, Ozcakar L. Carpal tunnel syndrome in two cases of all ulnar hand: a word for nerve's ultrasound. Acta Reumatol Port 2010; 35: 403 – 405.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePadua L, Pazzaglia C, Insola A, Aprile I, Caliandro P, Rampoldi M, et al. Schwannoma of the median nerve (even outside the wrist) may mimic carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurol Sci 2006; 26: 430 – 434.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTherimadasamy A, Peng YP, Putti TC, Wilder‐Smith EP. Carpal tunnel syndrome caused by gouty tophus of the flexor tendons of the fingers: sonographic features. J Clin Ultrasound 2011; 39: 463 – 465.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelberman RH, Hergenroeder PT, Hargens AR, Lundborg GN, Akeson WH. The carpal tunnel syndrome. A study of carpal canal pressures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981; 63: 380 – 383.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosen I. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA 1999; 282: 153 – 158.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStevens JC, Sun S, Beard CM, O'Fallon WM, Kurland LT. Carpal tunnel syndrome in Rochester, Minnesota, 1961 to 1980. Neurology 1988; 38: 134 – 138.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalker FO, Cartwright MS, Wiesler ER, Caress J. Ultrasound of nerve and muscle. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115: 495 – 507.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeekman R, Visser LH. Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a critical review of the literature. Muscle Nerve 2003; 27: 26 – 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Academy of Neurology. Clinical practice guideline process manual. St. Paul, MN: American Academy of Neurology; 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBayrak IK, Bayrak AO, Kale M, Turker H, Diren B. Bifid median nerve in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. J Ultrasound Med 2008; 27: 1129 – 1136.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuncan I, Sullivan P, Lomas F. Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173: 681 – 684.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEl Miedany YM, Aty SA, Ashour S. Ultrasonography versus nerve conduction study in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: substantive or complementary tests? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004; 43: 887 – 895.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIannicelli E, Almberger M, Chianta GA, Salvini V, Rossi G, Monacelli G, et al. High resolution ultrasonography in the diagnosis of the carpal tunnel syndrome. Radiol Med 2005; 110: 623 – 629.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKele H, Verheggen R, Bittermann HJ, Reimers CD. The potential value of ultrasonography in the evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurology 2003; 61: 389 – 391.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKotevoglu N, Gulbahce‐Saglam S. Ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome and its relevance to clinical evaluation. Joint Bone Spine 2005; 72: 142 – 145.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoyuncuoglu HR, Kutluhan S, Yesildag A, Oyar O, Guler K, Ozden A. The value of ultrasonographic measurement in carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with negative electrodiagnostic tests. Eur J Radiol 2005; 56: 365 – 369.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSarria L, Cabada T, Cozcolluela R, Martinez‐Berganza T, Garcia S. Carpal tunnel syndrome: usefulness of sonography. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 1920 – 1925.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWiesler ER, Chloros GD, Cartwright MS, Smith BP, Rushing J, Walker FO. The use of diagnostic ultrasound in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31: 726 – 732.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWong SM, Griffith JF, Hui AC, Tang A, Wong KS. Discriminatory sonographic criteria for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46: 1914 – 1921.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYesildag A, Kutluhan S, Sengul N, Koyuncuoglu HR, Oyar O, Guler K, et al. The role of ultrasonographic measurements of the median nerve in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Radiol 2004; 59: 910 – 915.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSucher BM. Carpal tunnel syndrome: ultrasonographic imaging and pathologic mechanisms of median nerve compression. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2009; 109: 641 – 647.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAkcar N, Ozkan S, Mehmetoglu O, Calisir C, Adapinar B. Value of power Doppler and gray‐scale US in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: contribution of cross‐sectional area just before the tunnel inlet as compared with the cross‐sectional area at the tunnel. Korean J Radiol 2010; 11: 632 – 639.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAshraf AR, Jali R, Moghtaderi AR, Yazdani AH. The diagnostic value of ultrasonography in patients with electrophysiologicaly confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2009; 49: 3 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGhasemi‐Esfe AR, Khalilzadeh O, Mazloumi M, Vaziri‐Bozorg SM, Niri SG, Kahnouji H, et al. Combination of high‐resolution and color Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Acta Radiol 2011; 52: 191 – 197.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaymak B, Ozcakar L, Cetin A, Candan CM, Akinci A, Hascelik Z. A comparison of the benefits of sonography and electrophysiologic measurements as predictors of symptom severity and functional status in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 743 – 748.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeles I, Karagulle Kendi AT, Aydin G, Zog SG, Orkun S. Diagnostic precision of ultrasonography in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84: 443 – 450.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlauser AS, Halpern EJ, De ZT, Feuchtner GM, Arora R, Gruber J, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome assessment with US: value of additional cross‐sectional area measurements of the median nerve in patients versus healthy volunteers. Radiology 2009; 250: 171 – 177.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKurca E, Nosal V, Grofik M, Sivak S, Turcanova‐Koprusakova M, Kucera P. Single parameter wrist ultrasonography as a first‐line screening examination in suspected carpal tunnel syndrome patients. Bratisl Lek Listy 2008; 109: 177 – 179.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKwon BC, Jung KI, Baek GH. Comparison of sonography and electrodiagnostic testing in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33: 65 – 71.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee D, van Holsbeeck MT, Janevski PK, Ganos DL, Ditmars DM, Darian VB. Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Ultrasound versus electromyography. Radiol Clin N Am 1999; 37: 859 – 872, x.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeonard L, Rangan A, Doyle G, Taylor G. Carpal tunnel syndrome—is high‐frequency ultrasound a useful diagnostic tool? J Hand Surg Br 2003; 28: 77 – 79.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePastare D, Therimadasamy AK, Lee E, Wilder‐Smith EP. Sonography versus nerve conduction studies in patients referred with a clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Clin Ultrasound 2009; 37: 389 – 393.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
23389_ftp.pdf
Size:
911.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.