Show simple item record

Long‐term followup for rheumatoid arthritis patients in a multicenter outcomes study of silicone metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty

dc.contributor.authorChung, Kevin C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBurns, Patricia B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKim, H. Myraen_US
dc.contributor.authorBurke, Frank D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWilgis, E. F. Shawen_US
dc.contributor.authorFox, David A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-05T14:45:57Z
dc.date.available2013-10-18T17:47:29Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationChung, Kevin C.; Burns, Patricia B.; Kim, H. Myra; Burke, Frank D.; Wilgis, E. F. Shaw; Fox, David A. (2012). "Long‐term followup for rheumatoid arthritis patients in a multicenter outcomes study of silicone metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty ." Arthritis Care & Research 64(9): 1292-1300. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/93508>en_US
dc.identifier.issn2151-464Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn2151-4658en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/93508
dc.description.abstractObjective Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) often results in deformities at the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints. Patients with severe deformities can be treated by silicone metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty (SMPA). The objective of the study is to prospectively compare long‐term outcomes for an SMPA surgical and a nonsurgical cohort of RA patients. Methods A total of 67 surgical and 95 nonsurgical patients with severe subluxation and/or ulnar drift of the fingers at the MCP joints were recruited from 2004–2008 in this multicenter prospective cohort study. Patients could elect to undergo SMPA or not. Outcomes included the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 (AIMS2), grip/pinch strength, Jebsen‐Taylor Test, ulnar deviation, extensor lag, and arc of motion measurements at the MCP joints. Results There was no significant difference in the mean age, race, education, and income at baseline between the 2 groups. Surgical subjects had worse MHQ function and functional measurements at baseline. At 3 years, the mean overall MHQ score and the MHQ function, activities of daily living, aesthetics, and satisfaction scores showed significant improvement in the surgical group compared to the nonsurgical group. Ulnar deviation, extensor lag, and arc of motion in the MCP and proximal interphalangeal joints also improved significantly in the surgical group. No improvement was seen in the mean AIMS2 scores and grip/pinch strength. Complications were minimal with a fracture rate of 9.5%. Conclusion RA patients with poor baseline functioning showed long‐term improvement in hand function and appearance following treatment with SMPA compared to nonsurgical controls.en_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.en_US
dc.titleLong‐term followup for rheumatoid arthritis patients in a multicenter outcomes study of silicone metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplastyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeriatricsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arboren_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Health System, Ann Arboren_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSection of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, 2130 Taubman Center, SPC 5340, Ann Arbor, MI 48109‐5340en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCurtis National Hand Center, Baltimore, Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherPulvertaft Hand Centre, Derby, UKen_US
dc.identifier.pmid22511483en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/93508/1/21705_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/acr.21705en_US
dc.identifier.sourceArthritis Care & Researchen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeenan RF, Mason JH, Anderson JJ, Guccione AA, Kazis LE. AIMS2: the content and properties of a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales health status questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 1992; 35: 1 – 10.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHonkanen PB, Tiihonen R, Skytta ET, Ikavalko M, Lehto MU, Konttinen YT. Bioreconstructive poly‐L/D‐lactide implant compared with Swanson prosthesis in metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty in rheumatoid patients: a randomized clinical trial. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2010; 35: 746 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlderman AK, Chung KC, Kim HM, Fox DA, Ubel PA. Effectiveness of rheumatoid hand surgery: contrasting perceptions of hand surgeons and rheumatologists. J Hand Surg 2003; 28A: 3 – 11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlderman AK, Ubel PA, Kim HM, Fox DA, Chung KC. Surgical management of the rheumatoid hand: consensus and controversy among rheumatologists and hand surgeons. J Rheumatol 2003; 30: 1464 – 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlderman AK, Chung KC, Demonner S, Spilson SV, Hayward RA. Large area variations in the surgical management of the rheumatoid hand. Surg Forum 2001; LII: 479 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlderman AK, Chung KC, Demonner S, Spilson SV, Hayward RA. The rheumatoid hand: a predictable disease with unpredictable surgical practice patterns. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 47: 537 – 42.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMandl LA, Galvin DH, Bosch JP, George CC, Simmons BP, Axt TS, et al. Metacarpophalangeal arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis: what determines satisfaction with surgery? J Rheumatol 2002; 29: 2488 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBogoch ER, Judd MG. The hand: a second face? J Rheumatol 2002; 29: 2477 – 83.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChung KC, Burns PB, Wilgis EF, Burke FD, Regan M, Kim HM, et al. A multicenter clinical trial in rheumatoid arthritis comparing silicone metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty with medical treatment. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34: 815 – 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSharma S, Schumacher HR, McLellan AT. Evaluation of the Jebsen hand function test for use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 1994; 7: 16 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChung KC, Pillsbury MS, Walters MR, Hayward RA. Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg 1998; 23A: 575 – 87.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChung KC, Hamill JB, Walters MR, Hayward RA. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ): assessment of responsiveness to clinical change. Ann Plast Surg 1999; 42: 619 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBass RL, Stern PJ, Nairus JG. High implant fracture incidence with Sutter silicone metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty. J Hand Surg [Am] 1996; 21: 813 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD'Agostino RB Jr. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non‐randomized control group. Stat Med 1998; 17: 2265 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLittle RJ, Rubin DB. Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley; 1987.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley; 1987.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChung KC, Kotsis SV, Fox DA, Regan M, Burke FD, Wilgis EF, et al. Differences between the United States and the United Kingdom in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: analyses from a hand arthroplasty trial. Clin Rheumatol 2010; 29: 363 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShauver MJ, Chung KC. The minimal clinically important difference of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34: 509 – 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePincus T, Yazici Y, Bergman MJ. Patient questionnaires in rheumatoid arthritis: advantages and limitations as a quantitative, standardized scientific medical history. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2009; 35: 735 – 43, vii.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmidt K, Willburger RE, Miehlke RK, Witt K. Ten‐year follow‐up of silicone arthroplasty of the metacarpophalangeal joints in rheumatoid hands. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1999; 33: 433 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson YG, Sykes PJ, Niranian NS. Long‐term follow‐up of Swanson's silastic arthroplasty of the metacarpophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis. J Hand Surg 1993; 18B: 81 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHagert CG, Eiken O, Ohlsson NM, Aschan W, Movin A. Metacarpophalangeal joint implants. I. Roentgenographic study on the silastic finger joint implant, Swanson design. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1975; 9: 147 – 57.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevack B, Stewart HD, Flierenga H, Helal B. Metacarpo‐phalangeal joint replacement with a new prosthesis: description and preliminary results of treatment with the Helal flap joint. J Hand Surg [Br] 1987; 12: 377 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCreighton JJ Jr, Steichen JB, Strickland JW. Long‐term evaluation of Silastic trapezial arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg [Am] 1991; 16: 510 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcArthur PA, Milner RH. A prospective randomized comparison of Sutter and Swanson silastic spacers. J Hand Surg [Br] 1998; 23: 574 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKirschenbaum D, Schneider LH, Adams DC, Cody RP. Arthroplasty of the metacarpophalangeal joints with use of silicone‐rubber implants in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis: long‐term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75: 3 – 12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGellman H, Stetson W, Brumfield RH Jr, Costigan W, Kuschner SH. Silastic metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; 342: 16 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEl‐Gammal TA, Blair WF. Motion after metacarpophalangeal joint reconstruction in rheumatoid disease. J Hand Surg Am 1993; 18: 504 – 11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJensen CM, Boeckstyns ME, Kristiansen B. Silastic arthroplasty in rheumatoid MCP‐joints. Acta Orthop Scand 1986; 57: 138 – 40.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHansraj KK, Ashworth CR, Ebramzadeh E, Todd AO, Griffin MD, Ashley EM, et al. Swanson metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; 342: 11 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeckenbaugh RD, Dobyns JH, Linscheid RL, Bryan RS. Review and analysis of silicone‐rubber metacarpophalangeal implants. J Bone Joint Surg 1976; 58A: 483 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMannerfelt L, Andersson K. Silastic arthroplasty of the metacarpophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975; 57: 484 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlair WF, Shurr DG, Buckwalter JA. Metacarpophalangeal joint implant arthroplasty with a Silastic spacer. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984; 66: 365 – 70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFleming SG, Hay EL. Metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty eleven year follow‐up study. J Hand Surg [Br] 1984; 9: 300 – 2.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBieber EJ, Weiland AJ, Volenec‐Dowling S. Silicone‐rubber implant arthroplasty of the metacarpophalangeal joints for rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68: 206 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldfarb CA, Stern PJ. Metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg 2003; 85A: 1869 – 78.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChung KC, Kowalski CP, Myra Kim H, Kazmers IS. Patient outcomes following Swanson silastic metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty in the rheumatoid hand: a systematic overview. J Rheumatol 2000; 27: 1395 – 402.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVahvanen V, Viljakka T. Silicone rubber implant arthroplasty of the metacarpophalangeal joint in rheumatoid arthritis: a follow‐up study of 32 patients. J Hand Surg [Am] 1986; 11: 333 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwanson AB. Flexible implant arthroplasty for arthritic finger joints: rationale, technique, and results of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1972; 54: 435 – 55.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSollerman CJ, Geijer M. Polyurethane versus silicone for endoprosthetic replacement of the metacarpophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1996; 30: 145 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRothwell AG, Cragg KJ, O'Neill LB. Hand function following Silastic arthroplasty of the metacarpophalangeal joints in the rheumatoid hand. J Hand Surg [Br] 1997; 22: 90 – 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEscott BG, Ronald K, Judd MG, Bogoch ER. NeuFlex and Swanson metacarpophalangeal implants for rheumatoid arthritis: prospective randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35: 44 – 51.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.