View Item 

Show simple item record

On the equivalence of posterior inference based on retrospective and prospective likelihoods: application to a case‐control study of colorectal cancer
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSong, J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorForster, J.J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMitra, R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMukherjee, B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-05T14:46:13Z
dc.date.available2013-10-18T17:47:30Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-09-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationGhosh, M.; Song, J.; Forster, J.J.; Mitra, R.; Mukherjee, B. (2012). "On the equivalence of posterior inference based on retrospective and prospective likelihoods: application to a case‐control study of colorectal cancer." Statistics in Medicine 31(20): 2196-2208. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/93566>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0277-6715en_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0258en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/93566
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltden_US
dc.subject.otherColorectal Canceren_US
dc.subject.otherStratificationen_US
dc.subject.otherCase‐Controlen_US
dc.subject.otherStereotype Regressionen_US
dc.subject.otherMultiplicative Intercepten_US
dc.titleOn the equivalence of posterior inference based on retrospective and prospective likelihoods: application to a case‐control study of colorectal canceren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelStatistics and Numeric Dataen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid22495822en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/93566/1/sim5358.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/sim.5358en_US
dc.identifier.sourceStatistics in Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAhn J, Mukherjee B, Banerjee M, Cooney KA. Bayesian inference for the stereotype regression model: application to a case‐control study of prostate cancer. Statistics in Medicine 2009; 28: 3139 – 3157.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSatten GA, Kupper LL. Inferences about exposure‐disease associations using probability‐of‐exposure information. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1993; 88: 200 – 208.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRice KM. Equivalence between conditional and mixture approaches to the Rasch model and matched case‐control studies, with applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2004; 99: 510 – 522.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRice KM. Equivalence between conditional and random‐effects likelihoods for pair‐matched case‐control studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2008; 103: 385 – 396.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiggle PJ, Morris SE, Wakefield JC. Point‐source modeling using matched case control data. Biostatistics 2000; 1: 89 – 105.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeaman SR, Richardson S. Equivalence of prospective and retrospective models in the Bayesian analysis of case‐control studies. Biometrika 2004; 91: 15 – 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGhosh M, Zhang L, Mukherjee B. Equivalence of posteriors in the Bayesian analysis of the multinomial‐Poisson transformation. Metron‐International Journal of Statistics 2006; LXIV: 19 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStaicu AM. On the equivalence of prospective and retrospective likelihood methods in case‐control studies. Biometrika 2010; 97: 990 – 996.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. John Willey & Sons: Hoboken, New Jersey, 2002.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeinberg CR, Wacholder S. Prospective analysis of case‐control data under general multiplicative‐intercept risk models. Biometrika 1993; 80: 461 – 465.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson JA. Regression and ordered categorical variable. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1984; 46: 1 – 40.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenland S. Alternative models for ordinal logistic regression. Statistics in Medicine 1994; 13: 1665 – 1677.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKuss O. On the estimation of the stereotype regression model. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2006; 50: 1877 – 1890.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAhn J, Mukherjee B, Gruber SB, Sinha S. Missing exposure data in stereotype regression model: application to matched case‐control study with disease subclassification. Biometrics 2010. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541‐0420.2010.01453.x. E‐pub ahead of print.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeweke J. Evaluting the accuracy of sampling‐based approaches to calculating posterior moments. In Bayesian Statistics 4. Bernardo JM, Smith AFM, Dawid AP, Berger JO (eds). Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1992; 169 – 193.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGilks WR, Wild P. Adaptive rejection sampling for Gibbs sampling. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C 1992; 41: 337 – 348.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoynter JN, Gruber SB, Higgins PD et al. Statins and the risk of colorectal cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 2005; 352: 2184 – 2192.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGhosh M, Chen M. Bayesian inference for matched case‐control studies. Sankhya, B 2002; 64: 107 – 127.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCornfield J. A method of estimating comparative rates from clinical data: applications to the cancer of the lung, breast and cervix. Journal of national Cancer Institute 1951; 11: 1269 – 1275.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson JA. Separate sample logistic discrimination. Biometrika 1972; 59: 19 – 35.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrentice RL, Pyke R. Logistic disease incidence models and case‐control studies. Biometrika 1979; 66: 403 – 411.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarroll RJ, Gail MH, Lubin JH. Case‐control studies with errors in covariates. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1993; 88: 185 – 199.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoeder K, Carroll RJ, Lindsay BG. A semiparametric mixture approach to case‐control studies with errors in covariables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1996; 91: 722 – 732.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScott AJ, Wild CJ. Fitting logistic models under case‐control or choice based sampling. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1986; 48: 170 – 182.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScott AJ, Wild CJ. Fitting logistic models in stratified case‐control studies. Biometrics 1991; 47: 497 – 510.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScott AJ, Wild CJ. Fitting regression models to case‐control data by maximum likelihood. Biometrika 1997; 84: 57 – 71.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWild CJ. Fitting prospective regression models to case‐control data. Biometrika 1991; 78: 705 – 717.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBreslow NE, Cain KC. Logistic regression for two‐stage case‐control data. Biometrika 1988; 75: 11 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBreslow NE, Chatterjee N. Design and analysis of two‐phase studies with binary outcome applied to Wilms tumour prognosis. Applied Statistics 1999; 48: 457 – 468.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChatterjee N. A two‐stage regression model for epidemiological studies with multivariate disease classification data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2004; 99: 127 – 138.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
sim5358.pdf
Size:
170.2KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.