Environmental Toxicants and Preterm Birth in Mexico City: A Geo-spatial Approach for Use in Epidemiology.
dc.contributor.author | Rivera-Gonzalez, Luis O. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-10-12T15:24:16Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2012-10-12T15:24:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_US |
dc.date.submitted | 2012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/93836 | |
dc.description.abstract | Much previous epidemiologic research on outdoor air pollution and perinatal outcomes has combined data from birth registries which often lack information on mothers’ location during pregnancy, and concentrations of pollution measured at government-run air quality monitors. This dissertation develops and compares methods (citywide average (CWA), nearest monitor (NM), inverse distance weighting (IDW), and ordinary kriging (OK)) to assess exposure during pregnancy over both time and space among 1,000 simulated women from five zones of Mexico City in 2008. Then associations between PM10 and O3 exposure and preterm births, and whether mother’s bone lead levels modify this association, are evaluated for a cohort of pregnant women in Mexico City (1997-2004). All assessment methods yielded similar, but not identical, results for the pollutants examined. The exposure ranges produced by spatial methods were significantly greater than CWA estimates. The degree to which the metrics differed varied by zone of residence, with much greater differences for PM10 spatial metrics compared to CWA in the industrialized area of northern Mexico City. This dissertation provided no evidence of increased risk for preterm birth among women exposed to high levels of two key pollutants (PM10 and O3) in Mexico City. Third trimester exposures showed higher effect estimates regardless of exposure assessment method. Nearest monitor method produced lower effect estimates than those of the citywide average and inverse distance weighting method. Variation in the risk of preterm birth associated with these exposures was not seen by bone lead concentration. We attribute these null findings in part to challenges of individual estimation of air pollution from air monitoring data, and in part to limited sample size. Application of geostatistical methods to estimate air pollution exposure can enhance exposure contrast in epidemiologic studies when spatial location and activity patterns are gathered, thus improving power. Environmental toxicants can impact fetal development, and Mexico City’s growing population is highly exposed to air pollution and environmental lead. Further research in this population, addressing multiple environmental exposures and employing sophisticated exposure assessment approaches, can thus contribute to understanding of the causes of adverse birth outcomes and offer insights for prevention. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Ordinary Kriging | en_US |
dc.subject | Air Pollution | en_US |
dc.subject | Preterm Birth | en_US |
dc.subject | Particulate Matter | en_US |
dc.subject | Ozone | en_US |
dc.title | Environmental Toxicants and Preterm Birth in Mexico City: A Geo-spatial Approach for Use in Epidemiology. | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Environmental Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | O'Neill, Marie Sylvia | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Sanchez, Brisa N. | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Hu, Howard | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Brown, Dan | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Public Health | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/93836/1/lorivera_1.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.