Show simple item record

Generalized Statistical Approaches for the Design for Phase I Trials.

dc.contributor.authorJia, Nanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-12T15:24:52Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2012-10-12T15:24:52Z
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.date.submitted2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/93913
dc.description.abstractThis research examines new design approaches for Phase I clinical trials, which are designed to study doses of the same agent or dose combinations of two agents in a small group of patients to determine the maximum tolerated dose or dose combination. Our first focus is to propose an adaptive accelerated Biased Coin Design (aaBCD) that generalizes the traditional BCD design algorithm by incorporating an adaptive weight function based upon the amount of follow-up of each enrolled patient, so that the dose assignment for each eligible patient can be determined immediately with no delay, leading to a shorter trial overall. We later focus on a generalized version of the Continual Reassessment Method (CRM), denoted gCRM, for identifying the maximum tolerated dose combination of two agents. For each dose of one agent, we apply the traditional CRM to study doses of the other agent; each of these CRM designs assumes the same dose-toxicity model, as well as the value of the parameter used in the model. However, each model includes a second parameter that varies among the models in an effort to allow flexibility when modeling the probability of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of all combinations, yet borrow strength among neighboring combinations as well. We lastly extend the gCRM by incorporating results for patients with incomplete follow-up into the decision rule for the assignment of a dose combination to the next available patient. We derive methods that account for the differing amounts of follow-up that could occur for the two agents and propose the use of a copula function to adjust for early- or late-onset DLTs. We show an optimal weight via theory and simulations that when the DLT times are distributed the same as assumed model, the optimal weight performs best among all the weight functions under consideration.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectPhase I Trialsen_US
dc.subjectDose-finding Algorithmsen_US
dc.subjectTime-to-Event Trialsen_US
dc.subjectBayesian Statisticsen_US
dc.subjectTwo-Agent Trialsen_US
dc.titleGeneralized Statistical Approaches for the Design for Phase I Trials.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineBiostatisticsen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberBraun, Thomas M.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberRothman, Edward D.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberJohnson, Timothy D.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberWang, Luen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/93913/1/jnan_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.