Show simple item record

Individual Recognition in Paper Wasps: Correlated Evolution of Sender Phenotypes and Receiver Cognition

dc.contributor.authorSheehan, Michael J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-12T15:25:17Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2012-10-12T15:25:17Z
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.date.submitted2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/93984
dc.description.abstractRecognition systems allow animals to discriminate among social partners on the basis of species, group membership, kinship or individual identity. Despite the fact that recognition is central to theories of social evolution, relatively little work has examined the processes by which the traits involved in recognition evolve. Notably, recognition often involves highly diverse traits used for recognition and specialized cognitive abilities, though the evolutionary origins of these traits has been largely unexplored. I consider three questions regarding the evolution of individual recognition, using Polistes wasps as a model. First, I examine the phenotypes used for recognition. Does selection favor individuals to broadcast their identity or is recognition akin to eavesdropping? Through a series of studies I show that the variable color patterns used by P. fuscatus to recognize conspecifics have arisen as the result of selection for distinctive easily recognizable identity signals. This work provides the first evidence that selection for recognition favors individuals to broadcast their identity. Selection for efficient recognition is likely to be a prominent mechanism maintaining polymorphism in social species. Second, I examine the specificity of cognitive processes associated with recognition. Do wasps use general learning mechanism for recognition or is it a specialized process? I demonstrate that P. fuscatus wasps have face-recognition specific learning adaptations, suggesting that cognitive evolution may be highly specific. Additionally, I show that wasps have surprisingly robust social memories despite their small brain size. Third, it is difficult to understand how sender and receiver phenotypes are elaborated in the absence of the other. I propose that the evolution novel recognition systems may be facilitated by pre-existing sender or receiver biases. I provide initial tests of the hypotheses, finding that sender bias is likely to be a widespread mechanism facilitating the evolution of novel recognition systems. Additionally, I provide experimental evidence for a receiver bias in Polistes wasps. The work presented in this dissertation present a multi-faceted examination of the evolution of an important social trait – individual recognition. Importantly, the results of this dissertation demonstrate that individual recognition will be an important model for studies of phenotypic polymorphic and cognitive evolution.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectIndividual Recognitionen_US
dc.subjectSocial Evolutionen_US
dc.subjectPaper Waspsen_US
dc.subjectPolymorphismen_US
dc.subjectSocial Cognitionen_US
dc.subjectCommunicationen_US
dc.titleIndividual Recognition in Paper Wasps: Correlated Evolution of Sender Phenotypes and Receiver Cognitionen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberTibbetts, Elizabethen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberMitani, John C.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberKnowles, Laura Laceyen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberBergman, Thore Jonen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/93984/1/mic_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.