Show simple item record

An Analysis of Activist Responses to Environmental Controversies in West Virginia.

dc.contributor.authorFuller, Ashley T.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-12T15:25:44Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2012-10-12T15:25:44Z
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.date.submitted2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/94051
dc.description.abstractThis study examines activism against environmental hazards caused by coal and chemical industry corporations in West Virginia from the 1980s to 2010. The purpose of the study is to understand the factors that influence activism toward corporations causing environmental harm. Three cases studies are presented; two examine conflicts around mountaintop removal mining and one involves the production of the insecticide methyl isocyanate (MIC). Using a primarily qualitative, exploratory data analysis of interviews, newspaper articles, and stakeholder publications, this study investigates the factors influencing activists who are challenging environmentally-hazardous corporate practices or products. Findings include differences in activist mobilization based on whether an individual is from the area in which activism is occurring, whether she currently lives in the activism area, or whether she is neither living in nor from the activist area. Further, the study examines why people in some areas facing environmental hazards fight them, while others do not. In keeping with prior social movement theorist work, the perceived need for jobs provided by environmental hazard-causing industries coupled with long-term reliance on an industry hinders mobilization efforts. Activists varied in terms of cognitive factors that motivated opposition to environmental hazards. This suggests a need for within-movement idea-sharing and attempts to create mobilization that is ideologically salient to multiple activist sub-groups within a movement. Idea-sharing and improved ideological salience may increase recruitment and retention, aiding in effectiveness. Said findings are relevant to those studying or participating in the environmental justice movement that blends labor organizing, social problem amelioration, and ecosystem protection. More broadly, the findings are relevant to social movement scholarship, especially that involving multiple problems and activist identities within the same movement, and for environmental sociology.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Studiesen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Sociologyen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Justiceen_US
dc.titleAn Analysis of Activist Responses to Environmental Controversies in West Virginia.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberTaylor, Dorceta E.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberDewar, Margaret E.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberScott, Rebecca R.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberWondolleck, Julia M.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Sciences (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/94051/1/fulashle_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.