Show simple item record

Climate policy processes, local institutions, and adaptation actions: mechanisms of translation and influence

dc.contributor.authorAgarwal, Arunen_US
dc.contributor.authorPerrin, Nicolasen_US
dc.contributor.authorChhatre, Ashwinien_US
dc.contributor.authorBenson, Catherine S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKononen, Minnaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-07T17:04:29Z
dc.date.available2014-01-07T14:51:07Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationAgarwal, Arun; Perrin, Nicolas; Chhatre, Ashwini; Benson, Catherine S.; Kononen, Minna (2012). "Climate policy processes, local institutions, and adaptation actions: mechanisms of translation and influence." Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 3(6): 565-579. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/94240>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1757-7780en_US
dc.identifier.issn1757-7799en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/94240
dc.description.abstractThis paper reviews and synthesizes the published literature on decentralization of renewable resources and development interventions to identify four key lessons for future adaptation planning at the national level. After presenting an analysis of why studies of decentralization reforms are relevant to adaptation planning, the paper examines priority adaptation projects identified by 47 Least Developed Countries in their National Adaptation Programmes of Action (NAPAs). Our research analyzes the range of institutional instruments and relationships visible in contemporary decentralization reforms. The four major lessons for adaptation planning concern the need for national adaptation planners to: (1) attend systematically to local institutions relevant to adaptation and increase local capacity through transfers of information, financial, and technical resources; (2) empower communities and local governments by increasing local autonomy so as to decentralize adaptation planning and implementation; (3) create mechanisms for information sharing among decision makers across sectors and levels of decision making; and (4) improve accountability of local decision makers to their constituents. WIREs Clim Change 2012, 3:565–579. doi: 10.1002/wcc.193 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website .en_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.en_US
dc.titleClimate policy processes, local institutions, and adaptation actions: mechanisms of translation and influenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelAtmospheric and Oceanic Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSustainable Development Department, World Bank, Washington DC, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherGlobal Environment Facility, Washington DC, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Geography, University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign, IL, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherEurope and Central Asis Department, World Bank, Washington DC, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/94240/1/193_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/wcc.193en_US
dc.identifier.sourceWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Changeen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSamakande I, Senzanje A, Manzungu E. Sustainable water management in smallholder irrigation schemes: understanding the impact of field water management on maize productivity on two irrigation schemes in Zimbabwe. Phy Chem Earth 2004, 29: 1075 – 1081.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaunders F, Mohammed SM, Jiddawi N, Sjoling S. An examination of governance arrangements at Kisakasaka mangrove reserve in Zanzibar. Environ Manage 2008, 41: 663 – 675.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTan‐Mullins M. The state and its agencies in coastal resources management: the political ecology of fisheries management in Pattani, southern Thailand. Singap J Trop Geogr 2007, 28: 348 – 361.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAraral E. Bureaucratic incentives, path dependence, and foreign aid: an empirical institutional analysis of irrigation in the Philippines. Policy Sci 2005, 38: 131 – 157.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaikhuri RK, Nautiyal S, Rao KS, Chandrasekhar K, Gavali R, Saxena KG. Analysis and resolution of protected area ‐ people conflicts in Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India. Environ Conserv 2000, 27: 43 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlair H. Participation and accountability at the periphery: democratic local governance in six countries. World Dev 2000, 28: 21 – 39.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoffmann I. Access to land and water in the Zamfara Reserve. A case study for the management of common property resources in pastoral areas of West Africa. Hum Ecol 2004, 32: 77 – 105.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeinzen‐Dick R, Raju KV, Gulati A. What affects organization and collective action for managing resources? Evidence from canal irrigation systems in India. World Dev 2002, 30: 649 – 666.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThebaud B, Batterbury S. Sahel pastoralists: opportunism, struggle, conflict and negotiation. a case study from eastern Niger. Glob Environ Change‐Hum Policy Dimens 2001, 11: 69 – 78.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSingh VK, Suresh A, Gupta DC, Jakhmola RC. Common property resources rural livelihood and small ruminants in India: a review. Indian J Anim Sci 2005, 75: 1027 – 1036.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScott JC. Seeing Like a State. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1999.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwatuk LA. Political challenges to implementing IWRM in Southern Africa. Phys Chem Earth 2005, 30: 872 – 880.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSatria A, Matsuda Y. Decentralization of fisheries management in Indonesia. Mar Policy 2004, 28: 437 – 450.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiry HY. Decentralized coastal zone management in Malaysia and Indonesia: a comparative perspective. Coast Manage 2006, 34: 267 – 285.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThorburn CC. The house that poison built: Customary marine property rights and the live food fish trade in the Kei Islands, Southeast Maluku. Dev Change 2001, 32: 151 – 180.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite A, Deguit E, Jatulan W, Eisma‐Osorio L. Integrated coastal management in Philippine local governance: evolution and benefits. Coast Manage 2006, 34: 287 – 302.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSarch MT. Fishing and farming at Lake Chad: institutions for access to natural resources. J Environ Manage 2001, 62: 185 – 199.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMosse D. Collective action, common property, and social capital in South India: an anthropological commentary. Econ Dev Cult Change 2006, 54: 695 – 724.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRap E. Cultural performance, resource flows and passion in politics: A Situational analysis of an election rally in western Mexico. J Lat Am Stud 2007, 39: 595 – 625.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFujiie M, Hayami Y, Kikuchi M. The conditions of collective action for local commons management: the case of irrigation in the Philippines. Agric Econ 2005, 33: 179 – 189.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgrawal A. Climate adaptation, Local Institutions, and Sustainable Livelihoods, SDV, Washington DC: The World Bank; 2008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarrington J, Bebbington A. Reluctant Partners: Non‐Governmental Organizations, the State, and Sustainable Agricultural Development. New York: Routledge; 1993.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGibson CC, Ostrom E, Ahn TK. The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey. Ecol Econ 2000, 32: 217 – 239.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Research Council (NRC). Radiative Forcing of Climate Change: Expanding the Concept and Addressing Uncertainties, Committee on Radiative Forcing Effects on Climate Change, Climate Research Committee, Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, Division on Earth and Life Studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2005, 208.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSolomon S, Plattner G, Knutti R, Friedlingstein P. Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions, 2009. Available at: www.pnas.orgcgi.doi10.1073pnas.0812721106. (Accessed September 29, 2012).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Neill BC, Oppenheimer M. Dangerous climate impacts and the Kyoto Protocol. Science 2002, 296: 1971 – 1972.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ, Conde C, O'Brien K, Pulhin J, Pulwarty R, Smit B, Takahashi K. Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE, eds. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2007, 717 – 743.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConway D, Schipper ELF. Adaptation to climate change in Africa: challenges and opportunities identified in Africa. Glob Environ Change 2011, 21: 227 – 237.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLibecap GD, Strickel RH, eds. The Economics of Climate Change: Adaptations Past and Present. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdger WN. Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam. World Dev 1999, 27: 249 – 269.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBatterbury S, Forsyth T. Fighting back: human adaptations in marginal environments. Environment 1999, 41: 7 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerkes F, Jolly D. Adapting to climate change: Social‐Ecological resilience in a Canadian western Arctic community. Conserv Ecol 2001, 5: 18. Available at: http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art18. (Accessed July 15, 2012).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReid P, Vogel C. Living and responding to multiple stressors in South Africa—Glimpses from KwaZulu‐Natal. Glob Environ Change 2006, 16: 195 – 206.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEakin H, Lemos M. Institutions and change: the challenge of building adaptive capacity in Latin America. Glob Environ Change 2010, 20: 1 – 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLarsen RK, Swartling ÅG, Powell N, May B, Plummer R, Simonsson L, Osbeck M. A framework for facilitating dialogue between policy planners and local climate change adaptation professionals: cases from Sweden, Canada and Indonesia. Environ Sci Policy 2012, 23: 12 – 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSietz D, Boschutz M, Klein RJT. Mainstreaming climate adaptation into development assistance: Rationale, institutional barriers, and opportunities in Mozambique. Environ Sci Policy 2011, 14: 493 – 502.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStringer LC, Dyer JC, Reed MS, Dougill AJ, Twyman C, Mkwambisi D. Adaptations to climate change, drought, and desertification: local insights to enhance policy in southern Africa. Environ Sci Policy 2009, 12: 748 – 765.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOstrom E. A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2007, 104: 15181 – 15187.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyd E, Lemos M. The politics of adaptation across scales: the implications of additionality to policy choice and development. In: Boykoff MT, ed. The Politics of Climate Change: A Survey. London: Routledge; 2010, 96 – 110.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYoung O. The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, Scale. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2002.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOstrom E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUphoff N, Buck L. Strengthening rural local institutional capacities for sustainable livelihoods and equitable development, Social Development Department of the World Bank. Mimeo. 2006.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUNFCCC. Report on the Least Developed Countries Expert Group Stocktaking Meeting on the Progress Made by Parties in the Preparation and Implementation of National Adaptation Programmes of Action, FCCC/SBI/2007/32. Bonn: UNFCCC; 2007.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUNFCCC. The Marrakesh Accords & The Marrakesh Declaration, Advance Text. 2001. Available at: http://www.unfcccc.int/cop7/documents/accords_draft.pdf. (Accessed July 22, 2012).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUNFCCC. National Adaptation Programmes of Action: Index of NAPA Projects by Country. Bonn: UNFCCC; 2012.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOsman‐Elasha B, Downing T. Lessons Learned in Preparing National Adaptation Programmes of Action in Eastern and Southern Africa. Policy Analysis Report. Oxford: European Capacity Building Initiative; 2007.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUNFCCC. Status of NAPA implementation under the LDCF: As of May 2012. 2012. Available at: http://unfccc.int/cooperation_support/least_developed_countries_portal_/ldcf_napa_projects/items/5632.php. (Accessed July 2012).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgrawal A, Ribot JC. Accountability in decentralization: a framework with South Asian and West African cases. J Dev Areas 1999, 33: 473 – 502.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRibot J. Decentralisation, participation, and accountability in Sahelian forestry: legal instruments of political‐administrative control. Africa 1999, 69: 23 – 65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWunsch JS. Decentralization, local governance and ‘recentralization’ in Africa. Public Adm Dev 2001, 21: 277 – 288.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBardhan P. Decentralization of governance and development. J Econ Perspect 2002, 16: 185 – 205.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCampbell T. The Quiet Revolution: Decentralization and the Rise of Political Participation in Latin American Cities. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press; 2003.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNoel E. Power, politics and place: Who holds the reins of environmental regulation? Ecol Law Q 1999, 25: 559 – 563.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenau JN. The future of politics. Futures (special issue) 1999, 31: 1005 – 1016.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgrawal A, Perrin N. Mobilizing Rural Institutions. SDV Internal Report. Washington DC: The World Bank. 2009.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgrawal A. Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2005.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSomanathan E, Prabhakar R, Mehta BS. Decentralization for cost‐effective conservation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106: 4143 – 4147.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRibot J. African Decentralization: Local Actors, Powers, and Accountability. Democracy, Governance, and Human Rights Paper No. 8, Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development; 2002.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRibot JC, Agrawal A, Larson AM. Recentralizing while decentralizing: how national governments reappropriate forest resources. World Dev 2006, 34: 1864 – 1886.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBratton M. Non‐governmental organizations in Africa: Can they influence public policy? Dev Change 1990, 21: 87 – 118.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKorten DC. 1987. Third generation NGO strategies: a key to people‐centered development. World Dev 15 (suppl 1): 145 – 159.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUphoff N. Grassroots organizations and NGOs in rural development: opportunities with diminishing states and expanding markets. World Dev 1993, 21: 607 – 622.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUtting P, ed. Forest Policy and Politics in the Philippines: The Dynamics of Participatory Conservation. Quezon City, Philippines: UNRISD and Ateneo de Manila University Press; 1999.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEdwards M. NGO Rights and Responsibilities: A New Deal for Global Governance. London: The Foreign Policy Center.; 2000.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBenson C, Agrawal A. More power, less autonomy? Decentralized natural resource governance in the twenty‐first century, Keynote lecture delivered at the IASC regional meeting, Arizona State University, October 2, 2010.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThang N, Rossler P, Schaltenbrand H, Sieber P. Safeguarding multifunctional forest ecosystems in Vietnam: Introducing village‐level community forest management. Mt Res Dev 2007, 27: 196 – 201.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndersson K, Gibson C. Decentralized governance and environmental change: Local institutional moderation of deforestation in Bolivia. J Pol Analysis Mgmt 2007, 26: 99 – 123.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAcharya K. Private, collective, and centralized institutional arrangements for managing forest “Commons” in Nepal. Mt Res Dev 2005, 25: 269 – 277.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDevkota SR. Is strong sustainability operational? An example from Nepal. Sustainable Dev 2005, 13: 297 – 310.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgrawal A, Ostrom E. Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Pol Soc 2001, 29: 485 – 514.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWily L. Moving forward in African community forestry: trading power, not use rights. Soc Nat Resour 1997, 12: 49 – 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgrawal A, Yadama G. How do local institutions mediate market and population pressures on resources? Forest Panchayats in Kumaon, India. Dev Change 1997, 28: 437 – 466.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe la Torre‐Castro M. Beyond regulations in fisheries management: The dilemmas of the “beach recorders” Bwana dikos in Zanzibar, Tanzania. Ecol Soc 2006, 11: [online]. (Accessed September 29, 2012).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin H. Community forestry initiatives in Myanmar: an analysis from a social perspective. Int Forestry Rev 2005, 6: 79 – 88.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNayak PK, Berkes F. Politics of co‐optation: Community Forest Management Versus Joint Forest Management in Orissa, India. Environ Manage 2008, 41: 707 – 718.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaik DB, Decker DJ. A multisector framework for assessing community‐based forest management: lessons from Madagascar. Ecol Soc 2007, 12: [online]. (Accessed September 29, 2012).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNunan F. Empowerment and institutions: managing fisheries in Uganda. World Dev 2006, 34: 1316 – 1332.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.