Show simple item record

Clinicopathologic features, patterns of recurrence, and survival among women with triple‐negative breast cancer in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network

dc.contributor.authorLin, Nancy U.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVanderplas, Annen_US
dc.contributor.authorHughes, Melissa E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTheriault, Richard L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEdge, Stephen B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWong, Yu‐ningen_US
dc.contributor.authorBlayney, Douglas W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNiland, Joyce C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWiner, Eric P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWeeks, Jane C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-07T17:04:43Z
dc.date.available2014-01-07T14:51:08Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-11-15en_US
dc.identifier.citationLin, Nancy U.; Vanderplas, Ann; Hughes, Melissa E.; Theriault, Richard L.; Edge, Stephen B.; Wong, Yu‐ning ; Blayney, Douglas W.; Niland, Joyce C.; Winer, Eric P.; Weeks, Jane C. (2012). "Clinicopathologic features, patterns of recurrence, and survival among women with tripleâ negative breast cancer in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network ." Cancer 118(22): 5463-5472. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/94292>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0008-543Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/94292
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to describe clinicopathologic features, patterns of recurrence, and survival according to breast cancer subtype with a focus on triple‐negative tumors. METHODS: In total, 15,204 women were evaluated who presented to National Comprehensive Cancer Network centers with stage I through III breast cancer between January 2000 and December 2006. Tumors were classified as positive for estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) (hormone receptor [HR]‐positive) and negative for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2); positive for HER2 and any ER or PR status (HER2‐positive); or negative for ER, PR, and HER2 (triple‐negative). RESULTS: Subtype distribution was triple‐negative in 17% of women (n = 2569), HER2‐positive in 17% of women (n = 2602), and HR‐positive/HER2‐negative in 66% of women (n = 10,033). The triple‐negative subtype was more frequent in African Americans compared with Caucasians (adjusted odds ratio, 1.98; P < .0001). Premenopausal women, but not postmenopausal women, with high body mass index had an increased likelihood of having the triple‐negative subtype ( P = .02). Women with triple‐negative cancers were less likely to present on the basis of an abnormal screening mammogram (29% vs 48%; P < .0001) and were more likely to present with higher tumor classification, but they were less likely to have lymph node involvement. Relative to HR‐positive/HER2‐negative tumors, triple‐negative tumors were associated with a greater risk of brain or lung metastases; and women with triple‐negative tumors had worse breast cancer‐specific and overall survival, even after adjusting for age, disease stage, race, tumor grade, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (overall survival: adjusted hazard ratio, 2.72; 95% confidence interval, 2.39‐3.10; P < .0001). The difference in the risk of death by subtype was most dramatic within the first 2 years after diagnosis (overall survival for 0‐2 years: OR, 6.10; 95% confidence interval, 4.81‐7.74). CONCLUSIONS: Triple‐negative tumors were associated with unique risk factors and worse outcomes compared with HR‐positive/HER2‐negative tumors. Cancer 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society. The authors evaluate 15,204 women who presented to National Comprehensive Cancer Network centers with stage I, II, and III breast cancer between January 2000 and December 2006. The results indicate that, relative to patients with hormone receptor‐positive/HER2‐negative breast cancer, patients with triple‐negative tumors have unique presenting features and clinical risk factors, and they experience significantly worse outcomes, even after controlling for age, stage, race, grade, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherObesityen_US
dc.subject.otherTriple‐Negativeen_US
dc.subject.otherBasal‐Likeen_US
dc.subject.otherBreast Canceren_US
dc.subject.otherOutcomesen_US
dc.subject.otherBrain Metastasesen_US
dc.subject.otherRaceen_US
dc.titleClinicopathologic features, patterns of recurrence, and survival among women with triple‐negative breast cancer in the National Comprehensive Cancer Networken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texasen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDana‐Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Medical Oncology, Stanford University Cancer Center, Palo Alto, Californiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvaniaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusettsen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Information Sciences, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, Californiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Population Sciences, Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusettsen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Breast and Soft Tissue Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New Yorken_US
dc.identifier.pmid22544643en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/94292/1/27581_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.27581en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCanceren_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaiti B, Kundranda MN, Spiro TP, Daw HA. The association of metabolic syndrome with triple‐negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010; 121: 479 ‐ 483.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKwan ML, Kushi LH, Weltzien E, et al. Epidemiology of breast cancer subtypes in 2 prospective cohort studies of breast cancer survivors [serial online]. Breast Cancer Res. 2009; 11: R31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLara‐Medina F, Perez‐Sanchez V, Saavedra‐Perez D, et al. Triple‐negative breast cancer in Hispanic patients: high prevalence, poor prognosis, and association with menopausal status, body mass index, and parity. Cancer. 2011; 117: 3658 ‐ 3669.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVona‐Davis L, Rose DP, Hazard H, et al. Triple‐negative breast cancer and obesity in a rural Appalachian population. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008; 17: 3319 ‐ 3324.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKennecke H, Yerushalmi R, Woods R, et al. Metastatic behavior of breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 3271 ‐ 3277.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000; 406: 747 ‐ 752.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKreike B, van Kouwenhove M, Horlings H, et al. Gene expression profiling and histopathological characterization of triple‐negative/basal‐like breast carcinomas [serial online]. Breast Cancer Res. 2007; 9: R65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchneider BP, Winer EP, Foulkes WD, et al. Triple‐negative breast cancer: risk factors to potential targets. Clin Cancer Res. 2008; 14: 8010 ‐ 8018.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, et al. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA. 2006; 295: 2492 ‐ 2502.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYang XR, Sherman ME, Rimm DL, et al. Differences in risk factors for breast cancer molecular subtypes in a population‐based study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007; 16: 439 ‐ 443.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, et al. Triple‐negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2007; 13 ( 15 pt 1 ): 4429 ‐ 4434.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD, Parise CA, Caggiano V. Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)‐negative, progesterone receptor (PR)‐negative, and HER2‐negative invasive breast cancer, the so‐called triple‐negative phenotype: a population‐based study from the California Cancer Registry. Cancer. 2007; 109: 1721 ‐ 1728.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhipps AI, Malone KE, Porter PL, Daling JR, Li CI. Body size and risk of luminal, HER2‐overexpressing, and triple‐negative breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008; 17: 2078 ‐ 2086.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMillikan RC, Newman B, Tse CK, et al. Epidemiology of basal‐like breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008; 109: 123 ‐ 139.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStead LA, Lash TL, Sobieraj JE, et al. Triple‐negative breast cancers are increased in black women regardless of age or body mass index [serial online]. Breast Cancer Res. 2009; 11: R18.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTroester MA, Swift‐Scanlan T. Challenges in studying the etiology of breast cancer subtypes [serial online]. Breast Cancer Res. 2009; 11: 104.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin NU, Claus E, Sohl J, Razzak AR, Arnaout A, Winer EP. Sites of distant recurrence and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic triple‐negative breast cancer: high incidence of central nervous system metastases. Cancer. 2008; 113: 2638 ‐ 2645.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePunglia RS, Hughes ME, Edge SB, et al. Factors associated with guideline‐concordant use of radiotherapy after mastectomy in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 72: 1434 ‐ 1440.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDawood S, Broglio K, Kau SW, et al. Triple receptor‐negative breast cancer: the effect of race on response to primary systemic treatment and survival outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 220 ‐ 226.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerry DA, Cirrincione C, Henderson IC, et al. Estrogen‐receptor status and outcomes of modern chemotherapy for patients with node‐positive breast cancer. JAMA. 2006; 295: 1658 ‐ 1667.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHayes DF, Thor AD, Dressler LG, et al. HER2 and response to paclitaxel in node‐positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 1496 ‐ 1506.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuss HB, Berry DA, Cirrincione CT, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with early stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360: 2055 ‐ 2065.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrivers KF, Lund MJ, Porter PL, et al. The epidemiology of triple‐negative breast cancer, including race. Cancer Causes Control. 2009; 20: 1071 ‐ 1082.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceManders P, Pijpe A, Hooning MJ, et al. Body weight and risk of breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 126: 193 ‐ 202.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGunter MJ, Hoover DR, Yu H, et al. Insulin, insulin‐like growth factor‐I, and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009; 101: 48 ‐ 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVatten LJ, Holly JM, Gunnell D, Tretli S. Nested case‐control study of the association of circulating levels of serum insulin‐like growth factor I and insulin‐like growth factor binding protein 3 with breast cancer in young women in Norway. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008; 17: 2097 ‐ 2100.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarris LN, Broadwater G, Lin NU, et al. Molecular subtypes of breast cancer in relation to paclitaxel response and outcomes in women with metastatic disease: results from CALGB 9342 [serial online]. Breast Cancer Res. 2006; 8: R66.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLuck AA, Evans AJ, Green AR, Rakha EA, Paish C, Ellis IO. The influence of basal phenotype on the metastatic pattern of breast cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2008; 20: 40 ‐ 45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFulford LG, Reis‐Filho JS, Ryder K, et al. Basal‐like grade III invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: patterns of metastasis and long‐term survival [serial online]. Breast Cancer Res. 2007; 9: R4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin NU, Winer EP. Brain metastases: the HER2 paradigm. Clin Cancer Res. 2007; 13: 1648 ‐ 1655.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePestalozzi BC, Zahrieh D, Price KN, et al. Identifying breast cancer patients at risk for central nervous system (CNS) metastases in trials of the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Ann Oncol. 2006; 17: 935 ‐ 944.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEichler AF, Kuter I, Ryan P, Schapira L, Younger J, Henson JW. Survival in patients with brain metastases from breast cancer: the importance of HER‐2 status. Cancer. 2008; 112: 2359 ‐ 2367.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDawood S, Broglio K, Esteva FJ, et al. Survival among women with triple receptor‐negative breast cancer and brain metastases. Ann Oncol. 2009; 20: 621 ‐ 627.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBertucci F, Finetti P, Cervera N, et al. How basal are triple‐negative breast cancers? Int J Cancer. 2008; 123: 236 ‐ 240.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNielsen TO, Hsu FD, Jensen K, et al. Immunohistochemical and clinical characterization of the basal‐like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2004; 10: 5367 ‐ 5374.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCheang MC, Voduc D, Bajdik C, et al. Basal‐like breast cancer defined by 5 biomarkers has superior prognostic value than triple‐negative phenotype. Clin Cancer Res. 2008; 14: 1368 ‐ 1376.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHorner MJ, Ries LAG, Krapcho M, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975‐2006 [based on November 2008 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, 2009]. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2009. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2006. [Accessed January 15, 2012.]en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson WF, Luo S, Chatterjee N, et al. Human epidermal growth factor receptor‐2 and estrogen receptor expression, a demonstration project using the residual tissue repository of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009; 113: 189 ‐ 196.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaphner T, Tormey DC, Gray R. Annual hazard rates of recurrence for breast cancer after primary therapy. J Clin Oncol. 1996; 14: 2738 ‐ 2746.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.