View Item 

Show simple item record

Blood Pressure Measurement Device, Number and Timing of Visits, and Intra‐Individual Visit‐to‐Visit Variability of Blood Pressure

dc.contributor.authorLevitan, Emily B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKaciroti, Nikoen_US
dc.contributor.authorOparil, Suzanneen_US
dc.contributor.authorJulius, Stevoen_US
dc.contributor.authorMuntner, Paulen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-12-11T17:37:16Z
dc.date.available2014-01-07T14:51:08Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationLevitan, Emily B.; Kaciroti, Niko; Oparil, Suzanne; Julius, Stevo; Muntner, Paul (2012). "Blood Pressure Measurement Device, Number and Timing of Visits, and Intra‐Individual Visit‐to‐Visit Variability of Blood Pressure." The Journal of Clinical Hypertension 14(11). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/94447>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1524-6175en_US
dc.identifier.issn1751-7176en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/94447
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.titleBlood Pressure Measurement Device, Number and Timing of Visits, and Intra‐Individual Visit‐to‐Visit Variability of Blood Pressureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumthe Department of Biostatistics, Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumthe Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherand the Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama, Birmingham, ALen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherFrom the Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherthe Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL;en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/94447/1/jch.12005.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jch.12005en_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe Journal of Clinical Hypertensionen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH. Applied Longitudinal Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2004.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuntner P, Shimbo D, Tonelli M, et al. The relationship between visit‐to‐visit variability in systolic blood pressure and all‐cause mortality in the general population: findings from NHANES III, 1988 to 1994. Hypertension. 2011; 57: 160 – 166.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRothwell PM, Howard SC, Dolan E, et al. Effects of β‐blockers and calcium‐channel blockers on within‐individual variability in blood pressure and risk of stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2010; 9: 469 – 480.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRothwell PM, Howard SC, Dolan E, et al. Prognostic significance of visit‐to‐visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension. Lancet. 2010; 375: 895 – 905.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrickman AM, Reitz C, Luchsinger JA, et al. Long‐term blood pressure fluctuation and cerebrovascular disease in an elderly cohort. Arch Neurol. 2010; 67: 564 – 569.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhimin J, Guoying S, Xiaowei Z, et al. Intensified antihypertensive therapy and blood pressure variability in older than 70 of Chinese hypertensive patients. Heart. 2011; 97: A193.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWebb AJS, Fischer U, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM. Effects of antihypertensive‐drug class on interindividual variation in blood pressure and risk of stroke: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Lancet. 2010; 375: 906 – 915.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWebb AJS, Fischer U, Rothwell PM. Effects of β‐blocker selectivity on blood pressure variability and stroke. Neurology. 2011; 77: 731 – 737.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJulius S, Nesbitt SD, Egan BM, et al. Feasibility of treating prehypertension with an angiotensin‐receptor blocker. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354: 1685 – 1697.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJulius S, Nesbitt S, Egan B, et al. Trial of preventing hypertension: design and 2‐year progress report. Hypertension. 2004; 44: 146 – 151.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuntner P, Joyce C, Levitan EB, et al. Reproducibility of visit‐to‐visit variability of blood pressure measured as part of routine clinical care. J Hypertens. 2011; 29: 2332 – 2338.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoyston P, Altman DG. Regression using fractional polynomials of continuous covariates: parsimonious parametric modeling. Appl Statist. 1994; 43: 429 – 467.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMancia G, Facchetti R, Parati G, Zanchetti A. Visit‐to‐visit blood pressure variability in the European Lacidipine Study on Atheroscelerosis: methodological aspects and effects of antihypertensive treatment. J Hypertens. 2012; 30: 1241 – 1251.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGurland J, Tripathi RC. A simple approximation for unbiased estimation of the standard deviation. Am Stat. 1971; 25: 30 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJarrett RF. A minor exercise in history. Am Stat. 1968; 22: 25 – 26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePowers BJ, Olsen MK, Smith VA, et al. Measuring blood pressure for decision making and quality reporting: where and how many measures? Ann Intern Med. 2011; 154: 781 – 788.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals. Hypertension. 2005; 45: 142 – 161.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jch.12005.pdf
Size:
182.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.