View Item 

Show simple item record

Point source modeling of matched case–control data with multiple disease subtypes

dc.contributor.authorLi, Shien_US
dc.contributor.authorMukherjee, Bhramaren_US
dc.contributor.authorBatterman, Stuarten_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-12-11T17:37:19Z
dc.date.available2014-02-03T16:21:44Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-12-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationLi, Shi; Mukherjee, Bhramar; Batterman, Stuart (2012). "Point source modeling of matched case–control data with multiple disease subtypes." Statistics in Medicine 31(28): 3617-3637. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/94459>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0277-6715en_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0258en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/94459
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltden_US
dc.subject.otherAsthma Casesen_US
dc.subject.otherConditional Likelihooden_US
dc.subject.otherDisease Subclassificationen_US
dc.subject.otherIteratively Reweighted Least Squareen_US
dc.subject.otherMarkov Chain Monte Carloen_US
dc.subject.otherMatched Case–Controlen_US
dc.subject.otherPoint Source Modelingen_US
dc.titlePoint source modeling of matched case–control data with multiple disease subtypesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelStatistics and Numeric Dataen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid22826092en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/94459/1/sim5388.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/sim.5388en_US
dc.identifier.sourceStatistics in Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. Wiley: New York, 2002.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBreslow NE, Day NE. Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume I – The analysis of case‐control studies. IARC Scientific Publications 1980; 32: 335 – 338.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarnard GA. Contribution to the discussion of Professor Bartlett's paper. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 1963; 25: 294.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGallant AR. Nonlinear Statistical Models. Wiley: New York, 1987.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRice KM. Equivalence between conditional and mixture approaches to the Rasch model and matched case‐control studies, with applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2004; 99: 510 – 522.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRice KM. Equivalence between conditional and random‐effects likelihoods for pair‐matched case‐control studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2008; 103: 385 – 396.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelman A, Rubin DB. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science 1992; 7: 457 – 511.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCongdon P. Applied Bayesian Modelling. Wiley: New York, 2003.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLawson AB, Browne WJ, Vidal Rodeiro CL. Disease Mapping with WinBugs and MlWin. Wiley: New York, 2003.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiggle PJ, Rowlingson BS. A conditional approach to point process modeling of raised incidence. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 1994; 157: 433 – 440.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiggle PJ, Elliott P, Morris SE, Shaddick G. Regression modeling of disease risk in relation to point sources. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 1997; 160: 491 – 505.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiggle PJ, Morris SE, Wakefield J. Point‐source modeling using matched case‐control data. Biostatistics 2000; 1: 89 – 105.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiggle PJ, Moyeed RA, Tawn JA. Model‐based geostatistics (with discussion). Applied Statistics 1998; 47: 299 – 350.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWakefield JC, Morris SE. The Bayesian modelling of disease risk in relation to a point source. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2001; 96: 77 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDreassi E, Lagazio C, Maule M, Magnani C, Biggeri A. Sensitivity analysis of the relationship between disease occurrence and distance from a putative source of pollution. Geospatial Health 2008; 2: 263 – 271.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRodrigues A, Diggle PJ, Assuncao R. Semi‐parametric approach to point source modeling in epidemiology and criminology. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society C 2010; 59: 533 – 542.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLi S, Batterman S, Wasilevich E, Elasaad H, Wahl R, Mukherjee B. Asthma exacerbation and proximity of residence to major roads: a population‐based matched case‐control study among the pediatric Medicaid population in Detroit, Michigan. Environmental Health 2011; 10: 34. DOI: 10.1186/1476‐069X‐10‐34.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWu YC, Batterman S. Proximity of schools in Detroit, Michigan to automobile and truck traffic. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology 2006; 16: 457 – 470.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiciccio TJ, Kass RE, Raftery AE, Wasserman L. Computing Bayes factors by combining simulation and asymptotic approximations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1997; 92: 903 – 915.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKass RE, Raftery AE, Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1995; 90: 773 – 795.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBreslow NE, Day NE, Halvorsen KT, Prentice RL, Sabai C. Estimation of multiple relative risk functions in matched case‐control studies. American Journal of Epidemiology 1978; 108: 299 – 307.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiang KY, Stewart W. Polychotomous logistic regression methods for matched case‐control studies with multiple case or control groups. American Journal of Epidemiology 1987; 125: 720 – 730.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecher J, Jockel KH. Bias adjustment with polychotomous logistic regression in matched case‐control studies with two control groups. Biometrical Journal 1990; 7: 801 – 816.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecher H. Alternative parameterization of polychotomous models: theory and application to matched case‐control studies. Statistics in Medicine 1991; 10: 375 – 382.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThomas DC, Goldberg M, Dewar R, Siemiatycki J. Statistical methods relating several exposure factors to several diseases in case‐heterogeneity studies. Statistics in Medicine 1986; 5: 49 – 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDurbin N, Pasternack BS. Risk assessment for case‐control subgroups by polychotomous logistic regression. American Journal of Epidemiology 1986; 6: 1101 – 1117.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSinha S, Mukherjee B, Ghosh M. Bayesian semiparametric modeling for matched case‐control studies with multiple disease states. Biometrics 2004; 60: 41 – 49.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMukherjee B, Liu I, Sinha S. Analysis of matched case‐control data with multiple ordered disease states: possible choices and comparisons. Statistics in Medicine 2007; 26: 3240 – 3257.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMukherjee B, Ahn J, Liu I, Sanchez BN. On elimination of nuisance parameters in stratified proportional odds model by amalgamating conditional likelihoods. Statistics in Medicine 2008; 27: 4950 – 4971.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiggle PJ. A point process modeling approach to raised incidence of a rare phenomenon in the vicinity of a pre‐specified point. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 1990; 153: 349 – 362.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLawson AB. On the analysis of mortality events associated with a pre‐specified fixed point. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 1993; 156: 363 – 377.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
sim5388.pdf
Size:
1.128MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.