Response to Professor Olsen's Commentary on ‘Random Sampling – Is It Worth It?’
dc.contributor.author | Bracken, Michael B. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hertz‐picciotto, Irva | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Elliott, Michael R. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dudley, Donald J. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Buka, Stephen | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Robbins, James M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Paneth, Nigel | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-12-11T17:37:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-03-03T15:09:25Z | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2013-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Bracken, Michael B.; Hertz‐picciotto, Irva ; Elliott, Michael R.; Dudley, Donald J.; Buka, Stephen; Robbins, James M.; Paneth, Nigel (2013). "Response to Professor Olsen's Commentary on â Random Sampling â Is It Worth It?â ." Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology (1): 29-30. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/94518> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0269-5022 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1365-3016 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/94518 | |
dc.publisher | The National Academies Press | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | en_US |
dc.title | Response to Professor Olsen's Commentary on ‘Random Sampling – Is It Worth It?’ | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Pediatrics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 23215708 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/94518/1/ppe12019.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/ppe.12019 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Olsen J. Random sampling – is it worth it? Commentary to Belanger et al. Implementing provider‐based sampling for the National Children's Study: opportunities and challenges. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. In press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | National Research Council, Institute of Medicine. The National Children's Study Research Plan: A Review. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2008. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wadman M. Scientists urge broad sampling for US children's study. Nature News Blog, April 24th 2012. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kaiser J. Advisers say National Children's Study should represent U.S. population. Science Insider, April 25th 2012. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Belanger K, Buka S, Cherry DC, Dudley DJ, Elliott MR, Hale DE, et al. Implementing provider‐based sampling for the National Children's Study: opportunities and challenges. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 2012 Sept 27. Epub ahead of print. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.