View Item 

Show simple item record

Response to Professor Olsen's Commentary on ‘Random Sampling – Is It Worth It?’
dc.contributor.authorBracken, Michael B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHertz‐picciotto, Irvaen_US
dc.contributor.authorElliott, Michael R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDudley, Donald J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBuka, Stephenen_US
dc.contributor.authorRobbins, James M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPaneth, Nigelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-12-11T17:37:34Z
dc.date.available2014-03-03T15:09:25Zen_US
dc.date.issued2013-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationBracken, Michael B.; Hertz‐picciotto, Irva ; Elliott, Michael R.; Dudley, Donald J.; Buka, Stephen; Robbins, James M.; Paneth, Nigel (2013). "Response to Professor Olsen's Commentary on â Random Sampling â Is It Worth It?â ." Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology (1): 29-30. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/94518>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0269-5022en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-3016en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/94518
dc.publisherThe National Academies Pressen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.titleResponse to Professor Olsen's Commentary on ‘Random Sampling – Is It Worth It?’en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPediatricsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid23215708en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/94518/1/ppe12019.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ppe.12019en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlsen J. Random sampling – is it worth it? Commentary to Belanger et al. Implementing provider‐based sampling for the National Children's Study: opportunities and challenges. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. In press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Research Council, Institute of Medicine. The National Children's Study Research Plan: A Review. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWadman M. Scientists urge broad sampling for US children's study. Nature News Blog, April 24th 2012.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaiser J. Advisers say National Children's Study should represent U.S. population. Science Insider, April 25th 2012.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBelanger K, Buka S, Cherry DC, Dudley DJ, Elliott MR, Hale DE, et al. Implementing provider‐based sampling for the National Children's Study: opportunities and challenges. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 2012 Sept 27. Epub ahead of print.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ppe12019.pdf
Size:
73.82KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.