Show simple item record

A Suggested Core Content for Education Scholarship Fellowships in Emergency Medicine

dc.contributor.authorYarris, Lalena M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCoates, Wendy C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, Michelleen_US
dc.contributor.authorLind, Karenen_US
dc.contributor.authorJordan, Jaimeen_US
dc.contributor.authorClarke, Samen_US
dc.contributor.authorGuth, Todd A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSanten, Sally A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHamstra, Stanley J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKowalenko,, Terryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-03T19:35:59Z
dc.date.available2014-01-07T14:51:07Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationYarris, Lalena M.; Coates, Wendy C.; Lin, Michelle; Lind, Karen; Jordan, Jaime; Clarke, Sam; Guth, Todd A.; Santen, Sally A.; Hamstra, Stanley J.; Kowalenko,, Terry (2012). "A Suggested Core Content for Education Scholarship Fellowships in Emergency Medicine." Academic Emergency Medicine (12): 1425-1433. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/94705>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1069-6563en_US
dc.identifier.issn1553-2712en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/94705
dc.description.abstractA working group at the 2012 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference on education research in emergency medicine ( EM ) convened to develop a curriculum for dedicated postgraduate fellowships in EM education scholarship. This fellowship is intended to create future education scholars, equipped with the skills to thrive in academic careers. This proceedings article reports on the consensus of a breakout session subgroup tasked with defining a common core content for education scholarship fellowships. The authors propose that the core content of an EM education scholarship fellowship can be categorized in four distinct areas: career development, theories of learning and teaching methods, education research methods, and educational program administration. This core content can be incorporated into curricula for education scholarship fellowships in EM or other fields and can also be adapted for use in general medical education fellowships.en_US
dc.publisherWiley‐Blackwellen_US
dc.titleA Suggested Core Content for Education Scholarship Fellowships in Emergency Medicineen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid23279249en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/94705/1/acem12032.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/acem.12032en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAcademic Emergency Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSalas E, Klein C, King H, et al. Debriefing medical teams: 12 evidence‐based best practices and tips. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008; 34: 518 – 27.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGigante J, Dell M, Sharkey A. Getting beyond “Good Job”: how to give effective feedback. Pediatrics. 2011; 127: 205 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWald DA, Choo EK. Providing feedback in the emergency department. In: Rogers R, Mattu A, Winter M, Martinez J (eds). Practical Teaching in Emergency Medicine. West Sussex, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2009, pp 60 – 71.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVaughn LM, Baker RC, DeWitt TG. The problem learner. Teach Learn Med. 1998; 10: 217 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKahn NB. Dealing with the problem learner. Fam Med. 2001; 33: 655 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLucas JH, Stallworth JR. Providing difficult feedback: TIPS for the problem learner. Fam Med. 2003; 35: 544 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalter D. Modifying Motivation: Encouraging Difficult Learners. In: Biech E (ed). The 2007 Pfeiffer Annual: Training. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2007.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeehusen DA, Miser WF. Teaching the outstanding learner. Fam Med. 2006; 38: 731 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKessler C, Leone K. The current state of core competency assessment in emergency medicine and a future research agenda: recommendations of the working group on assessment of observable learner performance. Acad Emerg Med. 2012; 19: 000 – 00.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDowning SM, Yudkowsky R. Assessment in Health Professions Education. New York, NY: Routledge, 2009.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBordage G. Moving the field forward: going beyond quantative qualitative. Acad Med. 2007; 82 ( Suppl 10 ): S126 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeckman TJ, Cook DA. Developing scholarly projects in education: a primer for medical teachers. Med Teach. 2007; 29: 210 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYarris LM, DeIorio NM. Education research: a primer for educators in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2011; 18 ( Suppl 2 ): S27 – 35.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceColliver JA, McGaghie WC. The reputation of medical education research: quasi‐experimentation and unresolved threats to validity. Teach Learn Med. 2008; 20: 101 – 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook DA, Bordage G, Schmidt HG. Description, justification, clarification: a framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Med Educ. 2008; 42: 128 – 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRegehr G. Trends in medical education research. Acad Med. 2004; 79: 939 – 47.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBordage G. Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify. Med Educ. 2009; 43: 312 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Papp KK, Durning SJ. Clinician educators’ experiences with institutional review boards: results of a national study. Acad Med. 2008; 83: 590 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrause CK, Guth T, Richards D, Kane B, Marco CA. Ethical consideration education research in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2012; 19: 000 – 00.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams JM. Style: Lessons in Clarity and Grace. 9th ed. New York, NY: Pearson Longman, 2007.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrunk W, White EB. The Elements of Style. 4th ed. Needham Heights, MA: Longman Publishers, 2000.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecker HS. Writing for Social Scientists. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1986.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWald DA, Manthey DE, Kruus L, Tripp M, Barrett J, Amoroso B. The state of the clerkship: a survey of emergency medicine clerkship directors. Acad Emerg Med. 2007; 14: 629 – 34.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNasca TJ, Philibert I, Brigham T, Flynn TC. The next ACGME accreditation system–rationale and benefits. NEJM. 2012; 366: 1051 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKolb D. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1984.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJonasson DH. Thinking technology: toward a constructivist design model. Educ Technol. 1994; 34: 34 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. Evaluating Training Programs. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Berrett‐Koehler Publishers, 2006.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreen ML. Identifying, appraising, and implementing medical education curricula: a guide for medical educators. Ann Intern Med. 2001; 135: 889 – 96.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSociety for Academic Emergency Medicine. Fellowship directory website. Available at: http://www.saem.org/fellowship-directory. Accessed Jun 12, 2012.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoates WC, Lin M, Clarke S, et al. Defining a core curriculum for education scholarship fellowships in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2012; 19: 000 – 00.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyer EL. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. New York, NY: Wiley‐Blackwell, 1990.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlassick CE. Boyer's expanded definitions of scholarship, the standards of assessing scholarship, and the elusiveness of the scholarship of teaching. Acad Med. 2000; 75: 877 – 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaldwin C, Chandran L, Gusic M. Guidelines for evaluating the educational performance of medical school faculty: priming a national conversation. Teach Learn Med. 2011; 23: 285 – 97.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKuhn GJ. Faculty development: the educator's portfolio: its preparation, uses, and value in academic medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11: 307 – 11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarrell SE, Digioia NM, Broderick KB, Coates WC. Mentoring for clinician‐educators. Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11: 1346 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaylor CA, Taylor JC, Stoller JK. The influence of mentorship and role modeling on developing physician‐leaders: views of aspiring and established physician‐leaders. J Gen Intern Med. 2009; 24: 1130 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoates WC. Being a mentor: what's in it for me? Acad Emerg Med. 2012; 19: 92 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRamani S, Gruppen L, Kachur EK. Twelve tips for developing effective mentors. Med Teach. 2006; 28: 404 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSambunjak D, Straus SE, Marusic A. Mentoring in academic medicine. A systematic review. JAMA. 2006; 296: 1103 – 15.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLencioni P. The Five Dysfunctions of a Team: A Leadership Fable. San Francisco, CA: Jossey‐Bass, 2002.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollins J. Good to Great. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers, 2001.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShorr JA. 6 Tips for improving your negotiation skills: learn how to bargain so that all parties to the deal come away satisfied. Med Econ. 2011; 88: 44 – 5,47‐8,51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher R, Ury W, Patton B. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Penguin Group, 1991.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUry W. Getting Past No. New York, NY: Bantam Books, 1993.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLowenstein SR. Tuesdays to write … A guide to time management in academic emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16: 165 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllen DA. Getting Things Done: The Art of Stress‐free Productivity. New York, NY: Penguin Group, 2001en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDolmans DH, Tigelaar D. Building bridges between theory and practice in medical education using a design‐based research approach: AMEE Guide No. 60. Med Teach. 2012; 34: 1 – 10.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnowles M, Holton EF, Swanson RA. The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2005.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolmboe ES, Hawkins RE. Practical Guide to the Evaluation of Clinical Competence. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Mosby, 2008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBloom BS, Englehart MD, Furst EH, Hill WH, Krathwohl DR. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York, NY: McKay, 1956.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmbrose SA, Bridges MW, DiPietro M, Lovett MC, Norman MK. How Learning Works: 7 Research‐Based Principles for Smart Teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey‐Bass, 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBandura A. Social Learning Theory. New York, NY: General Learning Press, 1977.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThomas PA, Kern DE. Internet resources for curriculum development in medical education. J Gen Intern Med. 2004; 5 ( Pt2 ): 599 – 605.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilkes M, Bligh J. Evaluating educational interventions. BMJ. 1999; 318: 1269 – 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKern DE, Thomas PA, Howard DM, Bass EB. Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six‐Step Approach. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEva KW. What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 2004; 39: 98 – 106.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBowen JL. Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 2217 – 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCroskerry P. A universal model of diagnostic reasoning. Acad Med. 2009; 84: 1022 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIlgen JS, Humbert A, Kuhn G, et al. Assessment of diagnostic reasoning: a consensus statement summarizing theory, practice, and future needs. Acad Emerg Med. 2012; 18: 000 – 00.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCroskerry P, Abbass A, Wu AW. How doctors feel: affective issues in patients’ safety. Lancet. 2008; 372: 1205 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCroskerry P. The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to prevent them. Acad Med. 2003; 78: 1 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBordage G. Why did I miss the diagnosis? Some cognitive explanations and educational implications Acad Med. 1999; 10 ( suppl ): S138 – 43.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEricsson KA. Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 15: 988 – 94.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown G, Manogue M. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 22: Refreshing lecturing: a guide for lecturers. Med Teach. 2001; 23: 231 – 244.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMayer RE. Multimedia Learning. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2009.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReynolds G. Top Ten Slide Tips. Available at: http://www.GarrReynolds.com/Presentation/Slides.html. Accessed Sep 21, 2012.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtkinson C. Beyond Bullet Points. Available at: http://beyondbulletpoints.com/category/videos/. Accessed Sep 21, 2012.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLex JR. Effective presentation skills. In: Rogers R, Mattu A, Winter M, Martinez J (eds). Practical Teaching in Emergency Medicine. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell, 2009, pp 168 – 79.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMastoridis S, Kladidis S. Coming soon to a lecture theatre near you: the ‘clicker.’ Clin Teach. 2010; 7: 97 – 101.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEdmunds S, Brown G. Effective small group learning: AMEE Guide No. 48. Med Teach. 2010; 32: 715 – 26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeibel MD, Wagner MJ. Small group discussion skills. In: Rogers R, Mattu A, Winters M, Martinez J (eds). Practical Teaching in Emergency Medicine. Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell, 2009, pp 180 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhitman N, Schwenk T. Residents as Teachers: A Guide to Educational Practice. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah School of Medicine, 2005.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKilroy DA. Problem based learning. Emerg Med J. 2004; 21: 411 – 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParmelee DX, Hudes P. Team‐based learning: a relevant strategy in health professionals’ education. Med Teach. 2012; 34: 411 – 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParmelee DX, Michaelsen LK, Cook S, Hudes PD. Team‐based learning: a practical guide: AMEE guide no. 65. Med Teach. 2012; 34: e275 – 87.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeher JO, Gordon KC, Meyer B, Stevens N. A five‐step “microskills” model of clinical teaching. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1992; 5: 419 – 24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWolpaw TM, Wolpaw DR, Papp KK. SNAPPS: a learner‐centered model for outpatient education. Acad Med. 2003; 78: 893 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCunningham AS, Blatt SD, Fuller PG, Weinberger HL. The art of precepting: Socrates or Aunt Minnie? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999; 153: 114 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAldeen AZ, Gisondi MA. Bedside teaching in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13: 860 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBandiera G, Lee S, Tiberius R. Creating effective learning in today's emergency departments: how accomplished teachers get it done. Ann Emerg Med. 2005; 45: 253 – 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIrby DM, Wilkerson L. Teaching when time is limited. BMJ. 2008; 336: 384 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRodgers KG. Bedside teaching in the emergency department. In: Rogers R, Mattu A, Winter M, Martinez J (eds). Practical Teaching in Emergency Medicine. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2009, pp 35 – 47.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrantcharov TP, Reznick RK. Teaching procedural skills. BMJ. 2008; 336: 1129 – 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcLeod PJ, Steinert Y, Trudel J, Gottesman R. Seven principles for teaching procedural and technical skills. Acad Med. 2001; 76: 1080.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTorres M, Moayedi S. Teaching procedures: beyond “see one, do one, teach one.” In: Rogers R, Mattu A, Winter M, Martinez J (eds). Practical Teaching in Emergency Medicine. West Sussex, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2009, pp 48 – 59.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHedges JR. Pearls for the teaching of procedural skills at the bedside. Acad Emerg Med. 1994; 1: 401 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKneebone R. Evaluating clinical simulations for learning procedural skills: a theory‐based approach. Acad Med. 2005; 80: 549 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD'Eon M, Lear N, Turner M, Jones C. Perils of the hidden curriculum revisited. Med Teach. 2007; 29: 295 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrledge J, Phillips W, Murray WB, Lerant A. The use of simulation in healthcare: from systems issues, to team building, to task training, to education and high stakes examinations. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2012; 18: 326 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, et al. Technology‐enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. JAMA. 2011; 306: 978 – 88.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, et al. Does simulation‐based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional education? A meta‐analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med. 2011; 86: 706 – 11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcGaghie WC, Issenberg B, Petrusa E, Scalese RJ. A critical review of simulation based medical education research: 2003‐2009. Med Educ. 2010; 44: 50 – 63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIssenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high‐fidelity medical simulation that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005; 27: 10 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRudolph JW, Simon R, Raemer DB, Eppich WJ. Debriefing as a formative assessment: closing performance gaps in medical education. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 15: 1010 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEnde J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA. 1983; 250 ( 6 ): 777 – 81.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.