View Item 

Show simple item record

Contrasting treatment‐specific survival using double‐robust estimators
dc.contributor.authorKim, KyungMannen_US
dc.contributor.authorThompson, Simonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-03T19:39:14Z
dc.date.available2014-01-07T14:51:08Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-12-30en_US
dc.identifier.citationKim, KyungMann; Thompson, Simon (2012). "Contrasting treatment‐specific survival using double‐robust estimators." Statistics in Medicine 31(30): 4255-4268. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/94930>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0277-6715en_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0258en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/94930
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltden_US
dc.subject.otherInverse Weightingen_US
dc.subject.otherRestricted Mean Lifetimeen_US
dc.subject.otherRight Censoringen_US
dc.subject.otherDouble‐Robust Estimatoren_US
dc.subject.otherCox Regressionen_US
dc.subject.otherAverage Causal Effecten_US
dc.titleContrasting treatment‐specific survival using double‐robust estimatorsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelStatistics and Numeric Dataen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/94930/1/sim5511.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/sim.5511en_US
dc.identifier.sourceStatistics in Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBang H, Robins JM. Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models. Biometrics 2005; 61: 962 – 972. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541‐0420.2005.00377.x.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKang JDY, Schafer JL. Demystifying double robustness: a comparison of alternative strategies for estimating population means from incomplete data. Statistical Science 2007; 26: 523 – 539. DOI: 10.1214/07‐STS227.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFleming TR, Harrington DP. Counting Processes and Survival Analysis. John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1991.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZeng D, Chen Q. Adjustment for missingness using auxiliary information in semiparametric regression. Biometrics 2009; 66: 115 – 122. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541‐0420.2009.01231.x.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin DY, Wei LJ. The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazards model. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1989; 84: 1074 – 1078. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1989.10478874.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHirano K, Imbens GW. Estimation of causal effects using propensity score weighting: an application to data on right hear catheterization. Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology 2001; 2: 259 – 278. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020371312283.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchaubel DE, Wei G. Double inverse weighted estimation of cumulative treatment effects under non‐proportional hazards and dependent censoring. Biometrics 2011; 67: 29 – 38. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541‐0420.2010.01449.x.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTsiatis AA. Semiparametric Theory and Missing Data. Springer: New York, 2006.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBreslow NE. Contribution to the discussion on the paper by D. R. Cox, regression and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1972; 34: 216 – 217.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCox DR. Partial likelihood. Biometrika 1975; 62: 269 – 275. DOI: 10.2307/2335362.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeckman JJ. The scientific model of causality. Sociological Methodology 2005; 35: 1 – 97. DOI: 10.1111/j.0081‐1750.2005.00164.x.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeckman JJ, Ichimura H, Todd PE. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: evidence from evaluating a job training programme. The Review of Economic Studies 1997; 64: 605 – 654. DOI: 10.2307/2971733.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRubin DB. Which ifs have causal answers? Discussion of Holland's “Statistics and causal inference.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 1986; 81: 961 – 962. DOI: 10.2307/2289065.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRubin DB. Discussion of “Randomization Analysis of Experimental Data in the Fisher Randomization Test,” by D. Basu. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1980; 75: 591 – 593. DOI: 10.2307/2287653.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSnoeijs MG, Schaubal DE, Hene R, Hoitsma AJ, Idu MM, IJzermans JN, Ploeg RJ, Ringers J, Christiaans MH, Buurman WA, van Heurn LWE. Kidneys from donors after cardiac death provide survival benefit. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2010; 21: 1015 – 1021. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2009121203.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobins JM, Rotnitzky A, Zhao LP. Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1994; 89: 846 – 866. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1994.10476818.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of American Statistical Association 1958; 53: 457 – 481. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCox DR. Regression models and life tables (with Discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1972; 34: 187 – 200.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarrison T. Restricted mean life with adjustment for covariates. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1987; 82: 1169 – 1176. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1987.10478555.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarrison TG. Use of Irwin's restricted mean as an index for comparing survival in different treatment groups‐Interpretation and power considerations. Controlled Clinical Trials 1997; 18: 151 – 167. DOI: 10.1016/S0197‐2456(96)00089‐X.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZucker DM. Restricted mean life with covariates: modification and extension of a useful survival analysis method. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1998; 93: 702 – 709. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1998.10473722.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndersen PK, Hansen MG, Klein JP. Regression analysis of restricted mean survival time based on pseudo‐observations. Lifetime Data Analysis 2004; 10: 335 – 350. DOI: 10.1007/s10985‐004‐4771‐0.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchaubel DE, Guidinger MK, Biggins SW, Kalbfleisch JD, Pomfret EA, Sharma P, Merion RM. Survival benefit‐based deceased‐donor liver allocation. American Journal of Transplantation 2009; 9 ( 4 Pt 2 ): 970 – 981. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600‐6143.2009.02571.x.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeier P, Karrison T, Chappell R, Xie H. The price of Kaplan‐Meier. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2004; 99: 890 – 896. DOI: 10.1198/016214504000001259.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndersen PK, Perme MK. Pseudo‐observations in survival analysis. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2010; 19: 71 – 99. DOI: 10.1177/0962280209105020.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen P, Tsiatis AA. Causal inference on the difference of the restricted mean life between two groups. Biometrics 2001; 57: 1030 – 1038. DOI: 10.1111/j.0006‐341X.2001.01030.x.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRotnitzky A, Robins JM. Inverse probability weighting in survival analysis. The Encyclopedia of Biostatistics 2005; 4: 2619 – 2625. DOI: 10.1002/0470011815.b2a11040.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobins JM, Hernán M, Brumback B. Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology 2000; 11: 550 – 560. DOI: 10.1097/00001648‐200009000‐00011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceXie J, Liu C. Adjusted Kaplan‐Meier estimator and log‐rank test with inverse probability of treatment weighting for survival data. Statistics in Medicine 2005; 24: 3089 – 3110. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2174.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCole SR, Hernàn MA. Adjusted survival curves with inverse probability weights. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2004; 75: 45 – 49. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2003.10.004.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWei G. Semiparametric methods for estimating cumulative treatment effects in the presence of non‐proportional hazards and dependent censoring. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Biostatistics, university of Michigan, 2008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHubbard A, van der Laan MJ, Robins JM. Nonparametric locally efficient estimation of the treatment specific survival distribution with right censored data and covariates in observational studies. Statistical Models in Epidemiology, the Environment and Clinical trials; Springer Verlag 1999; 116: 135 – 178. DOI: 10.1007/978‐1‐4612‐1284‐3_3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983; 70: 41 – 55. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHo DE, Imai K, King G, Stuart EA. Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political science 2007; 15: 199 – 236. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpl013.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
sim5511.pdf
Size:
184.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.