View Item 

Show simple item record

Using paradata to explore item level response times in surveys
dc.contributor.authorCouper, Mick P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKreuter, Fraukeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-03T19:39:36Z
dc.date.available2014-03-03T15:09:24Zen_US
dc.date.issued2013-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationCouper, Mick P.; Kreuter, Frauke (2013). "Using paradata to explore item level response times in surveys." Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 176(1). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/95020>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0964-1998en_US
dc.identifier.issn1467-985Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/95020
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.subject.otherItem Level Timesen_US
dc.subject.otherMeasurement Erroren_US
dc.subject.otherParadataen_US
dc.titleUsing paradata to explore item level response times in surveysen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelStatistics and Numeric Dataen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, and University of Maryland, College Park, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Maryland, College Park, USA, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt‐ und  Berufsforschung, Nürnberg, and Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universität München, Germanyen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/95020/1/rssa1041.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01041.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society)en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchaeffer, N. C. and Maynard, D. M. ( 2006 ) Sounds of silence: response latency in cognitive assessments. A. Meet. American Association for Public Opinion Research, Montreal, May 18th–21st.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaFlamme, F. ( 2009 ) Data collection research using paradata at Statistics Canada. Modernisation of Statistics Production Conf., Stockholm, Nov.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLepkowski, J. M., Mosher, W. D., Davis, K. E., Groves, R. M., Van Hoewyk, J. and Willem, J. ( 2006 ) National Survey of Family Growth, Cycle 6: sample design, weighting, imputation, and variance estimation. Vitl Hlth Statist., 2, no. 142.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMayerl, J., Sellke, P. and Urban, D. ( 2005 ) Analyzing cognitive processes in CATI surveys with response latencies: an empirical evaluation of the consequences of using different baseline speed measures. In Schriftenreihe des Instituts fuer Sozialwissenschaften der Universität Stuttgart, no. 2/20005.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMayerl, J. and Urban, D. ( 2008 ) Antwortreaktionszeiten in Survey‐Analysen. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcLachlan, G. and Peel, D. ( 2000 ) Finite Mixture Models. New York: Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlson, K. and Peytchev, A. ( 2007 ) Effect of interviewer experience on interview pace and interviewer attitudes. Publ. Opin. Q., 71, 273 – 286.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSalthouse, T. A. ( 1991 ) Theoretical Perspectives on Cognitive Aging. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwarz, N., Park, D., Knäuper, B. and Sudman, S. ( 1999 ) Cognition, Aging, and Self‐reports. Washington DC: Psychology Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, E. E. ( 1968 ) Choice reaction time: an analysis of major theoretical positions. Psychol. Bull., 69, 77 – 110.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, E. R., Fazio, R. H. and Ceijka, M. A. ( 1996 ) Accessible attitudes influence categorization of multiply categorizable objects. J. Personlty Socl Psychol., 71, 888 – 898.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, E. R., and Lerner, M. ( 1986 ) Development of automatism of social judgments. J. Personlty Socl Psychol., 50, 246 – 259.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStatistics Netherlands ( 2002 ) Blaise Developer's Guide. Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStern, M. J. ( 2008 ) The use of client‐side paradata in analyzing the effects of visual layout on changing responses in web surveys. Fld Meth., 20, 377 – 398.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTourangeau, R. ( 1992 ) Context effects on responses to attitude questions: attitudes as memory structures. In Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research (eds N. Schwarz and S. Sudman ), pp. 35 – 47. New York: Springer.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTourangeau, R., Rips, L. and Rasinski, K. ( 2000 ) The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWagner‐Menghin, M. M. ( 2002 ) Towards the identification of non‐scalable personality questionnaire respondents: taking response time into account. Psychol. Beitr., 44, 62 – 77.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWells, T., Vidalon, M. and DiSogra, C. ( 2010 ) Differences in length of survey administration between Spanish‐language and English‐language survey respondents. Proc. Surv. Res. Meth. Sec. Am. Statist. Ass., 6186 – 6191.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWest, B. T., Welch, K. B. and Galecki, A. T. ( 2007 ) Linear Mixed Models; a Practical Guide using Statistical Software. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYan, T. and Tourangeau, R. ( 2008 ) Fast times and easy questions: the effects of age, experience and question complexity on web survey response times. Appl. Cogn. Psychol., 22, 51 – 68.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAjzen, I., Nichols, A. J. and Driver, B. C. ( 1995 ) Identifying salient beliefs about leisure activities: frequency of elicitation versus response latency. J. Appl. Socl Psychol., 25, 1391 – 1410.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBassili, J. N. ( 1996 ) The how and the why of response latency measurement in telephone surveys. In Answering Questions: Methodology for Determining Cognitive and Communicative Processes in Survey Research (eds N. Schwarz and S. Sudman ), pp. 319 – 346. San Francisco:  Jossey‐Bass.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBassili, J. N. ( 2003 ) The minority slowness effect: subtle inhibitions in the expression of views not shared by others. J. Personlty Socl Psychol., 84, 261 – 276.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBassili, J.N. and Krosnick, J. A. ( 2000 ) Do strength‐related attitude properties determine susceptibility to response effects?: new evidence from response latency, attitude extremity, and aggregate indices. Polit. Psychol., 21, 107 – 132.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBassili, J. N. and Scott, B. S. ( 1996 ) Response latency as a signal to question problems in survey research. Publ. Opin. Q., 60, 390 – 399.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCannell, C. F., Miller, P. V. and Oksenberg, L. ( 1981 ) Research on interviewing techniques. In Sociological Methodology (ed. S. Leinhardt ), pp. 389 – 437. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCaspar, R. A. and Couper, M. P. ( 1997 ) Using keystroke files to assess respondent difficulties with an ACASI instrument. Proc. Surv. Res. Meth. Sect. Am. Statist. Ass., 239 – 244.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConrad, F., Broome, J., Benki, J., Groves, R., Kreuter, F. and Vannette, D. ( 2010 ) To agree or not to agree?: impact of interview speech and survey participation decisions. In Proc. Jt Statist. Meet. American Statistical Association, pp. 5979 – 5993. Alexandria: American Statistical Association.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConrad, F., Couper, M., Tourangeau, R. and Galesic, M. ( 2005 ) Interactive feedback can improve the quality of responses in web surveys. Proc. Surv. Res. Meth. Sect. Am. Statist. Ass., 3835 – 3840.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCouper, M. P. ( 1998 ) Measuring survey quality in a CASIC environment. Jt Statist. Meet. American Statistical Association, Dallas, Aug.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCouper, M. P., Hansen, S. E. and Sadosky, S. A. ( 1997a ) Evaluating interviewer performance in a CAPI survey. In Survey Measurement and Process Quality (eds L. Lyberg, P. Biemer, M. Collins, E. de Leeuw, C. Dippo, N. Schwarz and D. Trewin ), pp. 267 – 285. New York: Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCouper, M. P., Horm, J. and Schlegel, J. ( 1997b ) Using trace files to evaluate the National Health Interview Survey CAPI instrument. Proc. Surv. Res. Meth. Sect. Am. Statist. Ass., 825 – 829.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCouper, M. P., Tourangeau, R. and Marvin, T. ( 2009 ) Taking the audio out of audio‐CASI. Publ. Opin. Q., 73, 281 – 303.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDraisma, S. and Dijkstra, W. ( 2004 ) Response latency and (para) linguistic expressions as indicators of response error. In Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires (eds S. Presser, J. Rogthgeb, M. Couper, J. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin and E. Singer ), pp. 131 – 147. Hoboken: Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFaust, M. E., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H. and Ferraro, F. R. ( 1999 ) Individual differences in informationprocessing rate and amount: implications for group differences in response latency. Psychol. Bull., 126, 777 – 799.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFazio, R. H. ( 1986 ) How do attitudes guide behavior? In The Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundation of Social Behavior (eds R. M. Sorrentino and E. T. Higgins ), pp. 204 – 243. New York: Guilford.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFazio, R. H. ( 1990 ) A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. In Review of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 11, Research Methods in Personality and Social Research eds C. Hendrick and M. S. Clark ), pp. 74 – 97. Newbury Park: Sage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFazio, R. H. and Williams, C. J. ( 1986 ) Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude‐perception and attitude behavior relations: an investigation of the 1984 Presidential Election. J. Personlty Socl Psychol., 51, 505 – 514.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher, D. L. and Glaser, R. A. ( 1996 ) Molar and latent models of cognitive slowing: implications for aging, dementia, depression, development, and intelligence. Psychonom. Bull. Rev., 3, 458 – 480.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGroves, R. M. and Heeringa, S. G. ( 2006 ) Responsive design for household surveys: tools for actively controlling survey errors and costs. J. R. Statist. Soc. A, 169, 439 – 457.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHansen, S. E. and Marvin, T. ( 2001 ) Reporting on item times and keystroke from Blaise audit trails. Int. Blaise User Group Meet., Washington DC. (Available from http://www.blaiseusers.org/2001/papers/Hansen_ Marvin–IBUC_Paper_FINAL.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeerwegh, D. ( 2003 ) Explaining response latencies and changing answers using client‐side paradata from a web survey. Socl Sci. Comput. Rev., 21, 360 – 373.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuckfeldt, R., Levine, J., Morgan, W. and Sprague, J. ( 1998 ) Election campaigns, social communication, and the accessibility of perceived discussant preference. Polit. Behav., 20, 263 – 294.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnowles, E. S. and Condon, C. A. ( 1999 ) Why people say ‘yes’: a dual‐process theory of acquiescence. J. Personlty Socl Psychol., 77, 379 – 386.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKreuter, F., Couper, M. P. and Lyberg, L. E. ( 2010 ) The use of paradata to monitor and manage survey data collection. In Proc. Jt Statist. Meet. American Statistical Association, pp. 282 – 296. Alexandria: American Statistical Association.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKreuter, F. and Kohler, U. ( 2009 ) Analyzing contact sequences in call record data: potential and limitation of sequence indicators for nonresponse adjustment in the European Social Survey. J. Off. Statist., 25, 203 – 226.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
rssa1041.pdf
Size:
565.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.