Overcoming Barriers to Addressing Education Problems With Research Design: A Panel Discussion
dc.contributor.author | Yarris, Lalena M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Gruppen, Larry D. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hamstra, Stanley J. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Anders Ericsson, K. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Cook, David A. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kowalenko, Terry | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-01-03T19:44:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-01-07T14:51:09Z | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2012-12 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Yarris, Lalena M.; Gruppen, Larry D.; Hamstra, Stanley J.; Anders Ericsson, K.; Cook, David A.; Kowalenko, Terry (2012). "Overcoming Barriers to Addressing Education Problems With Research Design: A Panel Discussion." Academic Emergency Medicine 19(12): 1344-1349. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/95428> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1069-6563 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1553-2712 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/95428 | |
dc.description.abstract | A plenary panel session at the 2012 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference “Education Research in Emergency Medicine: Opportunities, Challenges, and Strategies for Success” discussed barriers educators face in imagining, designing, and implementing studies to address educational challenges. This proceedings article presents a general approach to getting started in education research. Four examples of studies from the medical education literature that illustrate a distinct way to approach specific research questions are discussed. The study designs used are applicable to a variety of education research problems in emergency medicine ( EM ). Potential applications of studies are discussed, as well as effects and lessons learned. | en_US |
dc.publisher | JohnWiley & Sons, Inc. | en_US |
dc.title | Overcoming Barriers to Addressing Education Problems With Research Design: A Panel Discussion | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Medicine (General) | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 23252365 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/95428/1/acem12025.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/acem.12025 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Academic Emergency Medicine | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Matsumoto ED, Pace KT, Honey R, John D. Virtual reality ureteroscopy simulator as a valid tool for assessing endourological skills. Int J Urol. 2006; 13: 896 – 901. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Eva KW. On the limits of systematicity. Med Educ. 2008; 42: 852 – 3. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Glassick CE, Huber MT, Maeroff G. Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation of the Professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey‐Bass, 1997. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cook DA. If you teach them, they will learn: why medical education needs comparative effectiveness research. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012; 17: 305 – 10. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Roberts LW, Geppert C, Connor R, Nguyen K, Warner TD. An invitation for medical educators to focus on ethical and policy issues in research and scholarly practice. Acad Med. 2001; 76: 876 – 85. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cook DA. Twelve tips for evaluating educational programs. Med Teach. 2010; 32: 296 – 301. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cook DA. Getting started in medical education scholarship. Keio J Med. 2010; 59: 96 – 103. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Matsumoto ED, Hamstra SJ, Radomski SB, Cusimano MD. The effect of bench model fidelity on endourologic skills: a randomized controlled study. J Urol. 2002; 167: 1243 – 7. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Grober ED, Hamstra SH, Wanzel KR, et al. Laboratory based training in urological microsurgery with bench model simulators: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the durability of technical skill. J Urol. 2004; 172: 378 – 81. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Samuelson ML, Cadeddu JA, Matsumoto ED. Laparoscopic decision making: impact of preoperative reading and laparoscopic experience. J Urol. 2006; 176: 1553 – 7. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sabbagh RA, Chatterjee SB, Chawla AB, Hoogenes JC, Kapoor AB, Matsumoto ED. Transfer of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy skills from bench model to animal model: a prospective, single‐blind, randomized, controlled study. J Urol. 2012; 187: 1861 – 6. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hauge LS, Frischknecht AC, Boehler M, et al. Simulating management of patient care: how prepared are your interns to take call? Presentation: Surgical Education Week (ASE/APDS). Boston, MA, March, 2011. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Pusic M, Pecaric M, Boutis K. How much practice is enough? Using learning curves to assess the deliberate practice of radiograph interpretation. Using learning curves to assess the deliberate practice of radiograph interpretation. Acad Med. 2011; 86: 731 – 6. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ericsson KA. The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In: Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich P, Hoffman RR (eds). Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp 685 – 706. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 15: 988 – 94. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Thurstone LL. The learning curve equation. Psychological Monog. 1919; 26: 1 – 51. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ma IW, Brindle ME, Ronksley PE, Lorenzetti DL, Sauve RS, Ghali WA. Use of simulation‐based education to improve outcomes of central venous catheterization: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Acad Med. 2011; 86: 1137 – 47. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dong Y, Suri HS, Cook DA, et al. Simulation‐based objective assessment discerns clinical proficiency in central line placement: a construct validation. Chest. 2010; 137: 1050 – 6. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Downing SM. Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ. 2003; 37: 830 – 7. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Farrell SE, Coates WC, Kuhn GJ, Fisher J, Shayne P, Lin M. Highlights in emergency medicine medical education research: 2008. Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16: 1318 – 24. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kuhn GJ, Shayne P, Coates WC, Fisher J, Lin M, Maggio LA, Farrell SE. Critical appraisal of emergency medicine educational research: the best publications of 2009. Acad Emerg Med. 2010; 17 ( Suppl 2 ): S16 – 25. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Shayne P, Coates WC, Farrell SE, et al. Critical appraisal of emergency medicine educational research: the best publications of 2010. Acad Emerg Med. 2011; 18: 1081 – 9. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Papp KK, During SF. Clinician educators' experiences with institutional review boards: results of a national survey. Acad Med. 2008; 83: 590 – 5. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wolf FM. Methodological quality, evidence, and research in medical education (RIME). Acad Med. 2004; 79 ( Suppl 10 ): 68 – 9. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Bordage G. Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2007; 41: 737 – 45. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S, Dupras DM, Erwin PJ, Montori VM. Internet‐based learning in the health professions: a meta‐analysis. JAMA. 2008; 300: 1181 – 96. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Reed DA, Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Levine RB, Kern DE, Wright SM. Association between funding and quality of published medical education research. JAMA. 2007; 298: 1002 – 9. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Baernstein A, Liss HK, Carney PA, Elmore JG. Trends in study methods used in undergraduate medical education research, 1969–2007. JAMA. 2007; 298: 1038 – 45. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cook DA, Levinson AJ, Garside S. Method and reporting quality in health professions education research: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2011; 45: 227 – 38. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Beckman TJ, Cook DA. Developing scholarly projects in education: a primer for medical teachers. Med Teach. 2007; 29: 210 – 8. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bordage G. Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify. Med Educ. 2009; 43: 312 – 9. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Giacomini M. Theory‐based medicine and the role of evidence: why the emperor needs new clothes, again. Perspect Biol Med. 2009; 52: 234 – 51. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cook DA, Bordage G, Schmidt HG. Description, justification, and clarification: a framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Med Educ. 2008; 42: 128 – 33. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Pawson R. Realist methods in medical education research: what are they and what can they contribute? Med Educ. 2012; 46: 89 – 96. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Reflections on experimental research in medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010; 15: 455 – 64. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cook DA, Beckman TJ. Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application. Am J Med. 2006; 119: 166e7 – 16. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dillman D. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 2nd ed. New York, NY: JohnWiley & Sons, Inc., 2000. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cook DA, West CP. Conducting systematic reviews in medical education: a stepwise approach. Med Educ. 2012; 46: 943 – 52. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.