Establishing an Emergency Medicine Education Research Network
dc.contributor.author | Newgard, Craig D. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Beeson, Michael S. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kessler, Chad S. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kuppermann, Nathan | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Linden, Judith A. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Gallahue, Fiona | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wolf, Stephen | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hatten, Benjamin | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Akhtar, Saadia | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dooley‐hash, Suzanne L. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Yarris, Lalena | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kowalenko, Terry | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-01-03T19:45:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-01-07T14:51:07Z | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2012-12 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Newgard, Craig D.; Beeson, Michael S.; Kessler, Chad S.; Kuppermann, Nathan; Linden, Judith A.; Gallahue, Fiona; Wolf, Stephen; Hatten, Benjamin; Akhtar, Saadia; Dooley‐hash, Suzanne L. ; Yarris, Lalena; Kowalenko, Terry (2012). "Establishing an Emergency Medicine Education Research Network." Academic Emergency Medicine (12): 1468-1475. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/95595> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1069-6563 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1553-2712 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/95595 | |
dc.description.abstract | This project was developed from the research network track at the 2012 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference on education research in emergency medicine ( EM ). Using a combination of consensus techniques, the modified Delphi method, and qualitative research methods, the authors describe multiple aspects of developing, implementing, managing, and growing an EM education research network. A total of 175 conference attendees and 24 small‐group participants contributed to discussions regarding an education research network; participants were experts in research networks, education, and education research. This article summarizes relevant conference discussions and expert opinion for recommendations on the structure of an education research network, basic operational framework, site selection, leadership, subcommittees, guidelines for authorship, logistics, and measuring success while growing and maintaining the network. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Safe Publications | en_US |
dc.title | Establishing an Emergency Medicine Education Research Network | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Medicine (General) | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 23279253 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/95595/1/acem12028.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/acem.12028 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Academic Emergency Medicine | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Yarris LM, Linden JA, Hern HG, et al. Attending and resident satisfaction with feedback in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16 ( Suppl 2 ): S76 – 81. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | British Medical Journal Education Group for Guidelines on Evaluation. Guidelines for evaluating papers on educational interventions. BMJ. 1999; 318: 1265 – 7. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Papp KK, During SF. Clinician educators’ experiences with institutional review boards: results of a national survey. Acad Med. 2008; 83: 590 – 5. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bligh J, Parsell G. Research in medical education: finding its place. Med Educ. 1999; 33: 162 – 3. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Prideaux D, Bligh J. Research in medical education: asking the right questions. Med Educ. 2002; 36: 1114 – 5. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cook DA. The research we still are not doing: an agenda for the study of computer‐based learning. Acad Med. 2005; 80: 541 – 8. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hutchinson L. Evaluating and researching the effectiveness of educational interventions. BMJ. 1999; 318: 1267 – 9. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Norman G. RCT = results confounded and trivial: the perils of grand educational experiments. Med Educ. 2003; 37: 582 – 4. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Carney PA, Nierenberg DW, Pipas CF, Brooks WB, Stukel TA, Keller AM. Educational epidemiology: applying population‐based design and analytic approaches to study medical education. JAMA. 2004; 292: 1044 – 50. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Prystowsky JB, Bordage G. An outcomes research perspective on medical education: the predominance of trainee assessment and satisfaction. Med Educ. 2001; 35: 331 – 6. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lurie SJ. Raising the passing grade for studies of medical education. JAMA. 2003; 290: 1210 – 2. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Chen FM, Bauchner H, Burstin H. A call for outcomes research in medical education. Acad Med. 2004; 79: 955 – 60. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Beeson MS, Deiorio NM. It's time: an argument for a national emergency medicine education research center. Acad Emerg Med. 2010; 17 ( Suppl 2 ): S11 – 2. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Miles MB, Huberman M. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Safe Publications, 1994. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Giacomini MK, Cook DJ. User's guides to the medical literature XXIII. Qualitative Research in Health Care, A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA. 2000; 284: 357 – 362. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Choo EK, Fernandez R, Hayden EM, et al. An agenda for increasing grant funding of emergency medicine education research. Acad Emerg Med. 2012; 19: 1434 – 41. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Shayne P, Gallahue F, Rinnert S, et al. Reliability of a core competency checklist assessment in the emergency department: the Standardized Direct Observation Assessment Tool. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13: 727 – 32. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | LaMantia L, Kane B, Yarris L, et al. Real‐time inter‐rater reliability of the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors Standardized Observation Assessment Tool. Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16 ( Suppl 2 ): S51 – 7. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Yarris LM, Fu R, LaMantia J, et al. Effect of an educational intervention on faculty and resident satisfaction with real‐time feedback in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2011; 18: 504 – 12. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | The Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). Rationale development, and first steps. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10: 661 – 8. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | International Committee of Medical Journal Editors 2010. Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals. Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication. Available at: http://www.icmje.org/urm_full.pdf. Accessed April 3, 2012. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Flanagin A, Fontanarosa PB, DeAngelis CD. Authorship for research groups. JAMA. 2002; 288: 3166 – 8. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Serwint JR, Feigelman S, Dumont‐Driscoll M. Listing contributions of investigators in research groups [commentary]. JAMA. 2003; 289: 2212. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sullivan GM. Deconstructing quality in education research. J Grad Med Educ. 2011; 3: 121 – 4. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Maas ML, Conn V, Buckwalter KC, Herr K, Tripp‐Reimer T. Increasing nursing faculty research: the Iowa Gerontological Nursing Research and Regional Research Consortium Strategies. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2009; 41: 411 – 9. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lewis RJ. Educational research: time to reach the bar, not lower it. Acad Emerg Med. 2005; 12: 247 – 8. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Bordage G. Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2007; 41: 737 – 45. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.