View Item 

Show simple item record

Establishing an Emergency Medicine Education Research Network
dc.contributor.authorNewgard, Craig D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBeeson, Michael S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKessler, Chad S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKuppermann, Nathanen_US
dc.contributor.authorLinden, Judith A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGallahue, Fionaen_US
dc.contributor.authorWolf, Stephenen_US
dc.contributor.authorHatten, Benjaminen_US
dc.contributor.authorAkhtar, Saadiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDooley‐hash, Suzanne L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorYarris, Lalenaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKowalenko, Terryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-03T19:45:55Z
dc.date.available2014-01-07T14:51:07Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationNewgard, Craig D.; Beeson, Michael S.; Kessler, Chad S.; Kuppermann, Nathan; Linden, Judith A.; Gallahue, Fiona; Wolf, Stephen; Hatten, Benjamin; Akhtar, Saadia; Dooley‐hash, Suzanne L. ; Yarris, Lalena; Kowalenko, Terry (2012). "Establishing an Emergency Medicine Education Research Network." Academic Emergency Medicine (12): 1468-1475. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/95595>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1069-6563en_US
dc.identifier.issn1553-2712en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/95595
dc.description.abstractThis project was developed from the research network track at the 2012 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference on education research in emergency medicine ( EM ). Using a combination of consensus techniques, the modified Delphi method, and qualitative research methods, the authors describe multiple aspects of developing, implementing, managing, and growing an EM education research network. A total of 175 conference attendees and 24 small‐group participants contributed to discussions regarding an education research network; participants were experts in research networks, education, and education research. This article summarizes relevant conference discussions and expert opinion for recommendations on the structure of an education research network, basic operational framework, site selection, leadership, subcommittees, guidelines for authorship, logistics, and measuring success while growing and maintaining the network.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherSafe Publicationsen_US
dc.titleEstablishing an Emergency Medicine Education Research Networken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid23279253en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/95595/1/acem12028.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/acem.12028en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAcademic Emergency Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYarris LM, Linden JA, Hern HG, et al. Attending and resident satisfaction with feedback in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16 ( Suppl 2 ): S76 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBritish Medical Journal Education Group for Guidelines on Evaluation. Guidelines for evaluating papers on educational interventions. BMJ. 1999; 318: 1265 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Papp KK, During SF. Clinician educators’ experiences with institutional review boards: results of a national survey. Acad Med. 2008; 83: 590 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBligh J, Parsell G. Research in medical education: finding its place. Med Educ. 1999; 33: 162 – 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrideaux D, Bligh J. Research in medical education: asking the right questions. Med Educ. 2002; 36: 1114 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook DA. The research we still are not doing: an agenda for the study of computer‐based learning. Acad Med. 2005; 80: 541 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHutchinson L. Evaluating and researching the effectiveness of educational interventions. BMJ. 1999; 318: 1267 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorman G. RCT = results confounded and trivial: the perils of grand educational experiments. Med Educ. 2003; 37: 582 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarney PA, Nierenberg DW, Pipas CF, Brooks WB, Stukel TA, Keller AM. Educational epidemiology: applying population‐based design and analytic approaches to study medical education. JAMA. 2004; 292: 1044 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrystowsky JB, Bordage G. An outcomes research perspective on medical education: the predominance of trainee assessment and satisfaction. Med Educ. 2001; 35: 331 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLurie SJ. Raising the passing grade for studies of medical education. JAMA. 2003; 290: 1210 – 2.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen FM, Bauchner H, Burstin H. A call for outcomes research in medical education. Acad Med. 2004; 79: 955 – 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeeson MS, Deiorio NM. It's time: an argument for a national emergency medicine education research center. Acad Emerg Med. 2010; 17 ( Suppl 2 ): S11 – 2.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiles MB, Huberman M. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Safe Publications, 1994.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGiacomini MK, Cook DJ. User's guides to the medical literature XXIII. Qualitative Research in Health Care, A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA. 2000; 284: 357 – 362.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChoo EK, Fernandez R, Hayden EM, et al. An agenda for increasing grant funding of emergency medicine education research. Acad Emerg Med. 2012; 19: 1434 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShayne P, Gallahue F, Rinnert S, et al. Reliability of a core competency checklist assessment in the emergency department: the Standardized Direct Observation Assessment Tool. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13: 727 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaMantia L, Kane B, Yarris L, et al. Real‐time inter‐rater reliability of the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors Standardized Observation Assessment Tool. Acad Emerg Med. 2009; 16 ( Suppl 2 ): S51 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYarris LM, Fu R, LaMantia J, et al. Effect of an educational intervention on faculty and resident satisfaction with real‐time feedback in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2011; 18: 504 – 12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThe Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). Rationale development, and first steps. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10: 661 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInternational Committee of Medical Journal Editors 2010. Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals. Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication. Available at: http://www.icmje.org/urm_full.pdf. Accessed April 3, 2012.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlanagin A, Fontanarosa PB, DeAngelis CD. Authorship for research groups. JAMA. 2002; 288: 3166 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSerwint JR, Feigelman S, Dumont‐Driscoll M. Listing contributions of investigators in research groups [commentary]. JAMA. 2003; 289: 2212.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSullivan GM. Deconstructing quality in education research. J Grad Med Educ. 2011; 3: 121 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaas ML, Conn V, Buckwalter KC, Herr K, Tripp‐Reimer T. Increasing nursing faculty research: the Iowa Gerontological Nursing Research and Regional Research Consortium Strategies. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2009; 41: 411 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLewis RJ. Educational research: time to reach the bar, not lower it. Acad Emerg Med. 2005; 12: 247 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook DA, Beckman TJ, Bordage G. Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2007; 41: 737 – 45.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
acem12028.pdf
Size:
251.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.