View Item 

Show simple item record

Measuring the Impact of an Individual Course on Students' Success

dc.contributor.authorMesa, Vilmaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJaquette, Ozanen_US
dc.contributor.authorFinelli, Cynthia J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-03T19:46:36Z
dc.date.available2013-01-03T19:46:36Z
dc.date.issued2009-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationMesa, Vilma; Jaquette, Ozan; Finelli, Cynthia J. (2009). "Measuring the Impact of an Individual Course on Students' Success." Journal of Engineering Education 98(4). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/95653>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1069-4730en_US
dc.identifier.issn2168-9830en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/95653
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherAcademic Performanceen_US
dc.subject.otherAdvanced Placementen_US
dc.subject.otherCourse Impacten_US
dc.titleMeasuring the Impact of an Individual Course on Students' Successen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEngineering Educationen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/95653/1/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01032.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01032.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Engineering Educationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKolb, DA. 1986. User's guide for the learning styles inventory. Boston, MA: McBer.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFelder, R.M., G.N. Felder, M. Mauney, H.J. Charles, and E.J. Dietz. 1995. A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention: III. Gender differences in student performance and attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education 84 ( 2 ): 151 – 63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFelder, R.M., K.D. Forrest, L. Baker Ward, E.J. Dietz, and P.H. Mohr. 1993. A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention: I. Success and failure in the introductory course. Journal of Engineering Education 82 ( 1 ): 15 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFelder, R.M., P.H. Mohr, E.J. Dietz, and L. Baker Ward. 1994. A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention: II. Differences between students from rural and urban backgrounds. Journal of Engineering Education 83 ( 3 ): 209 – 17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrench, B.F., J.C. Immekus, and W.C. Oakes. 2003. A structural model of engineering students success and persistence. Paper presented at 33rd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education. Boulder, Co.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrench, B.F., J.C. Immekus, and W.C. Oakes. 2005. An examination of indicators of engineering students' success and persistence. Journal of Engineering Education 94 ( 4 ): 419 – 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGanter, S. 1999. An evaluation of calculus reform: A preliminary report of a national study. In Assessment practices in undergraduate mathematics MAA Notes # 49, eds. B. Gold, S.Z. Keith, and W.A. Marion. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeckman, J.J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47 ( 1 ): 153 – 62.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHestenes, D., M. Wells, and G. Swackhamer. 1992. Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher 30 ( 3 ): 141 – 58.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoit, M., and M.W. Ohland. 1998. The impact of a discipline‐based introduction to engineering course on improving retention. Journal of Engineering Education 87 ( 1 ): 79 – 85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHallett, Hughes D., A. Gleason, W.G. McCallum, D. Lomen, D. Lovelock, J. Tecosky Feldman, T. Tucker, D.E. Flath, J. Thrash, K. Rhea, A. Pasquale, S. Gordon, D. Quinney, and P.F. Lock. 2005. Calculus single variable. 5th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIshitani, T.T., and S. DesJardins. 2002. A longitudinal investigation of dropout from college in the United States. Journal of College Student Retention 4 ( 2 ): 173 – 201.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrasny, R., and V. Mesa. 2005. Survey of factors influencing student selection of freshman math courses at the University of Michigan. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrasny, R., and V. Mesa. 2006. Survey of factors influencing student selection of freshman math courses: Follow‐up. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartin, J.K., J. Mitchell, and T. Newell. 2004. Work in progress: Analysis of reliability of the fluid mechanics concept inventory. Paper presented at 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education. Savannah, Georgia.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorgan, S.L., and D.J. Harding. 2006. Matching estimators of causal effects. Prospects and pitfalls in theory and practice. Sociological Methods and Research 35 ( 1 ): 3 – 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShadish, W.R., T.D. Cook, and DT. Campbell. 2002. Experimental and quasi‐experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSolorzano, D.G., and A. Ornelas. 2004. A critical race analysis of Latina/o and African American advanced placement enrollment in pubic high‐schools. High School Journal 83 ( 3 ): 15 – 26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStewart, J. 2003. Calculus single variable. 5th ed. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWage, K.E., J.R. Buck, C.H. G. Wright, and T.B. Welch. 2005. The signals and systems concept inventory. IEEE Transactions on Education 48 ( 3 ): 448 – 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBernold, L.E., W.L. Bingham, P.H. McDonald, and T.M. Attia. 2000. Influence of learning type oriented teaching on academic success of engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education 89 ( 1 ): 191 – 99.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBernold, L.E., J.E. Spurlin, and C.M. Anson. 2007. Understanding our students: A longitudinal‐study of success and failure in engineering with implications for increased retention. Journal of Engineering Education 96 ( 3 ): 263 – 76.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBudny, D., W. LeBold, and G. Bjedov. 1998. Assessment of the impact of freshman engineering courses. Journal of Engineering Education 87 ( 4 ): 405 – 11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurtner, J. 2005. The use of discriminant analysis to investigate the influence of non‐cognitive factors on engineering school persistence. Journal of Engineering Education 94 ( 3 ): 335 – 38.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDesJardins, S., D.A. Ahlburgh, and B.P. McCall. 2002. A temporal investigation of factors related to timely degree completion. Journal of Higher Education 73 ( 5 ): 555 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEpstein, J. 2005. Development and validation of a Calculus Concept Inventory. New York: Polytechnic Institute, Brooklyn.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFelder, R.M. 1995. A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention: IV. Instructional methods and student responses to them. Journal of Engineering Education 84 ( 4 ): 361 – 67.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFelder, R.M., G.N. Felder, and E.J. Dietz. 1998. A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention: V. Comparison with traditionally taught students. Journal of Engineering Education 87 ( 4 ): 469 – 80.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.2168-9830.2009.tb01032.x.pdf
Size:
7.963MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.