Show simple item record

Two Sides of Self-Enhancement in Consumer Word-of-Mouth.

dc.contributor.authorPackard, Grant M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-04T18:05:17Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2013-02-04T18:05:17Z
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.date.submitted2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96056
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation explores self-enhancement in the exchange of consumption information (word-of-mouth) from the perspective of both the source and recipient of this information. The first essay demonstrates that unfavorable gaps between consumer perceptions of their own actual and ideal consumer knowledge (knowledge discrepancies) influence their word-of-mouth intentions and behavior. Results across four studies suggest that given a knowledge discrepancy, people are motivated to compensate for this perceived shortcoming by increasing the number of product reviews they intend to write, and/or the number of people with whom they intend to share these reviews. Compensatory word-of-mouth is moderated by the perception that sharing product knowledge with others is self-enhancing and mediated by the negative affect that arises from falling short of one’s ideals. Content analysis of knowledge discrepant participants’ word-of-mouth transmissions reveals evidence of a desire to convey a more positive (self-enhancing) image of their own consumer knowledge to others. The second essay of this dissertation examines the impact of source self-enhancement on the perceived credibility of the source, and as a result, their persuasiveness. I propose that word-of-mouth sources that are immodest or boastful in the course of sharing their product opinions generate uncertainty about their own credibility in the mind of the recipient. Three lab experiments reveal that cues highlighting uncertainty about the source’s motives in sharing their product opinion moderate whether the word-of-mouth recipient accepts or rejects the advice of a self-enhancing source. Participants were more likely to reject product recommendations from a self-enhancing source when: (a) the source’s motivation was linked with self-interest, (b) the target and source were dissimilar in terms of demographics, (c) the target was exposed to a generalized suspicion prime, and (d) the source’s self-enhancing message content was irrelevant to the information exchange. Perceptions of source trustworthiness mediate the relationship between source self-enhancement and target persuasion in word-of-mouth. Implications for consumer decision-making and for firms seeking to manage consumer social influence are discussed.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectSelf-enhancementen_US
dc.subjectWord-of-Mouthen_US
dc.subjectConsumer Knowledgeen_US
dc.subjectSelf-discrepancyen_US
dc.subjectSelf-presentationen_US
dc.titleTwo Sides of Self-Enhancement in Consumer Word-of-Mouth.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineBusiness Administrationen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberWooten, David B.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberGarcia, Stephen M.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberBagozzi, Richard P.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberDavis, Geralden_US
dc.contributor.committeememberGershoff, Andrew D.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMarketingen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/96056/1/gpackard_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.