Show simple item record

The Contributions of Preschool Attendance and Kindergarten Experience to Executive Functioning in Chinese and American Children.

dc.contributor.authorWeixler, Lindsay Hodges Bellen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-04T18:05:51Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2013-02-04T18:05:51Z
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.date.submitted2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96108
dc.description.abstractExecutive functions (EF), including working memory (WM), attention, and cognitive flexibility (CF), are fundamental to students’ academic success, and Chinese children exhibit a substantial advantage in these skills. This project explored this culture gap, as well as cultural differences in the associations between gender, preschool, and kindergarten experiences and EF. In Study 1, 198 American and 196 Chinese children were assessed at the beginning and end of kindergarten in EF skills. Parents reported their socioeconomic backgrounds and children’s preschool history. Chinese children were estimated to have spent, on average, over 4,000 hours in preschool, compared to just 1,400 hours in America. At kindergarten entry, Chinese children outscored American children by 0.80 standard deviations (SD) in attention, 0.62 SD in WM, and 0.47 SD in CF, controlling for SES differences. The attention gap remained the same from fall to spring, but the Chinese advantage grew to 0.95 SD in WM and 0.71 SD in CF. In both cultures, girls outscored boys at kindergarten entry by 0.22 SD in CF, but a female advantage was only present in the U.S. for attention (0.40 SD) and WM (0.44 SD). Preschool had a small positive association with school-entry WM in both cultures (β = 0.17), an association with attention in China (β = 0.27), and no association with school-entry CF. However, preschool did have a positive association with boys’ CF growth over kindergarten. In Study 2, researchers observed the same children in their kindergarten classrooms for one hour of a typical school day and coded the time that children spent in academic activities and that teachers spent giving instructions for activities and classroom procedures (labeled orientation). Orientation was associated with attention growth in the U.S. (β = 0.24). Academic activities were associated with CF growth in both cultures (β = 0.11), attention growth in the U.S. (β = 0.19), and WM growth in China (β = 0.31). These findings indicate that the Chinese EF advantage may be partially due to differences in the quantity and content of early schooling and highlight the importance of American investment in early education.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectExecutive Functioningen_US
dc.subjectCross-cultural Comparisonen_US
dc.subjectPreschoolen_US
dc.subjectEarly Childhood Educationen_US
dc.subjectKindergartenen_US
dc.subjectClassroom Instructionen_US
dc.titleThe Contributions of Preschool Attendance and Kindergarten Experience to Executive Functioning in Chinese and American Children.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePsychologyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberMorrison, Frederick J.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberCarlisle, Joanne F.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberCortina, Kai Schnabelen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberMiller, Kevin F.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/96108/1/lhbell_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.