Show simple item record

Considering a Relational Model for Depression in Women.

dc.contributor.authorKruse, Julie A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-04T18:06:02Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2013-02-04T18:06:02Z
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.date.submitted2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96124
dc.description.abstractPurposes of these secondary analyses studies were to extend testing of a relational theory of depression and show that low sense of belonging, poor social support, and loneliness were salient risk factors in women. The models took additional known predictors into account including adult attachment, mother-infant bonding, and conflict. Data came from: (1) a cross-sectional cohort study of female Navy recruits (n=114), and (2) a prospective longitudinal cohort study of diverse women enrolled in prenatal care (n=564). Participants in both studies were administered a battery of instruments that included the aforementioned model variables. Structural equation modeling was used to test the “fit” of the theoretical models and determine significance of direct and indirect paths. The proposed model for female Navy recruits explained 53% of the variance in depressive symptoms with loneliness and sense of belonging as the strongest indicators of depression. Perceived social support indirectly impacted depression as well. The Navy should consider interventions that increase perceived social support and sense of belonging in high risk for depression recruits to decrease loneliness and depression and circumvent recruits not completing basic training. The assumption that recruits are in close quarters and contact with other people and therefore are not lonely and receive adequate social support is not supported. In the second study, the model for postpartum depression (PPD) explained 35% of the variance in depressive symptoms with impaired bonding and loneliness as the strongest indicators. Sense of belonging, perceived social support from a healthcare practitioner and a partner, and parenting sense of competence were additional indicators. Findings from this study challenge current thinking about the relationship between impaired bonding and PPD as this study raises the possibility that impaired bonding is a risk for PPD as opposed to the reverse relationship. Additionally, the study provided evidence of the importance of healthcare practitioners’ alliance with patients especially for women who were sociodemographically disadvantaged as the healthcare relationship influenced PPD more than family or a partner. Sense of belonging, social support, and loneliness were strong predictors of depression in women, which highlights that there is a relational component to depression.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectConsidering a Relational Model for Depression in Female Navy Recruitsen_US
dc.subjectConsidering a Relational Model for Depression in Postpartum Womenen_US
dc.titleConsidering a Relational Model for Depression in Women.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineNursingen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberWilliams, Reg Arthuren_US
dc.contributor.committeememberCaldwell, Cleopatra Howarden_US
dc.contributor.committeememberSeng, Julia Schwartz Sen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberHagerty, Bonnie M.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNursingen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/96124/1/jkruse_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.