Show simple item record

Psychological Consequences of Embodied and Metaphorical Thinking: Empirical Properties, Theoretical Implications, and Future Directions.

dc.contributor.authorLee, Wing Singen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-04T18:06:13Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2013-02-04T18:06:13Z
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.date.submitted2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96140
dc.description.abstractThe nature of mental life, especially its relation to the physical body, has intrigued philosophers of mind for centuries. It is at the core of psychological interest, too. Perspectives varied over the years, and only recently have we been able to make a wide range of precise predictions about which bodily experiences relate to which mental processes. As it turns out, these relations are reliably captured by the metaphors we use. Prolific experimental research in the past few years has demonstrated diverse psychological consequences of embodied and metaphorical thinking. They challenge cognitive sciences’ prevailing assumptions that mental life is disembodied and that metaphors matter little for ordinary thinking. This body of work, while advancing the paradigmatic view on mental processes, remains in its infancy. So far researchers have focused on demonstrating the existence of metaphorical effects but have done little to explore their empirical complexity and theoretical relations to well-established principles of social cognition. The primary goal of my dissertation is to tackle these problems and advance theoretical integration. To begin, I put the current work in historical perspective by outlining how psychological interests in mental processes have changed over the last century. After identifying what we know and what we need to know to make progress, I present three papers including eleven experiments that go beyond demonstration and reveal some boundaries, mechanisms, and other unknown properties of metaphorical effects. Using the moral purity metaphor as an example, I found that metaphorical effects can be (1) conceptually generalized from one abstract domain to another (from washing away your sins to a broader notion of wiping the slate clean) and (2) sensitive to the modality of experiences (“dirty hands” vs. “dirty mouth”). Turning to the something smells fishy metaphor, I found that metaphorical effects can (3) run bidirectionally between the abstract and concrete domains (with significant effects between fishy smells and social suspicion) and (4) be mediated by the accessibility and moderated by the applicability of metaphorically associated knowledge. Throughout I highlight the implications of each property for embodiment and metaphor theorizing. I conclude with theoretical integration and promising future directions.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectMetaphoren_US
dc.subjectEmbodiment and Grounded Cognitionen_US
dc.subjectMoralityen_US
dc.subjectPurityen_US
dc.subjectSocial Trust and Suspicionen_US
dc.subjectFishy Smellsen_US
dc.titlePsychological Consequences of Embodied and Metaphorical Thinking: Empirical Properties, Theoretical Implications, and Future Directions.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePsychologyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberSchwarz, Norbert W.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberKrishna, Aradhna J.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberOyserman, Daphna R.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberEllsworth, Phoebe C.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/96140/1/spikelee_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.