Show simple item record

Smoking status and survival in the national comprehensive cancer network non–small cell lung cancer cohort

dc.contributor.authorFerketich, Amy K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNiland, Joyce C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMamet, Rizvanen_US
dc.contributor.authorZornosa, Carrieen_US
dc.contributor.authorD'Amico, Thomas A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEttinger, David S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKalemkerian, Gregory P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPisters, Katherine M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorReid, Mary E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOtterson, Gregory A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-12T19:00:56Z
dc.date.available2014-04-02T15:08:08Zen_US
dc.date.issued2013-02-15en_US
dc.identifier.citationFerketich, Amy K.; Niland, Joyce C.; Mamet, Rizvan; Zornosa, Carrie; D'Amico, Thomas A.; Ettinger, David S.; Kalemkerian, Gregory P.; Pisters, Katherine M.; Reid, Mary E.; Otterson, Gregory A. (2013). "Smoking status and survival in the national comprehensive cancer network non–small cell lung cancer cohort." Cancer 119(4): 847-853. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96341>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0008-543Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96341
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to evaluate survival among current smokers, former smokers, and never smokers who are diagnosed with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: The study included patients who participated in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network's NSCLC Database Project. Current, former, and never smokers were compared with respect to overall survival by fitting Cox regression models. RESULTS: Data from 4200 patients were examined, including 618 never smokers, 1483 current smokers, 380 former smokers who quit 1 to 12 months before diagnosis, and 1719 former smokers who quit >12 months before diagnosis. Among patients with stage I, II, and III disease, only never smokers had better survival than current smokers (hazard ratio, 0.47 [95% confidence interval, 0.26‐0.85] vs 0.51 [95% confidence interval, 0.38‐0.68], respectively). Among patients with stage IV disease, the impact of smoking depended on age: Among younger patients (aged ≤55 years), being a never smoker and a former smoker for ≥12 months increased survival. After age 85 years, smoking status did not have a significant impact on overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who were smoking at the time of diagnosis had worse survival compared with never smokers. Among younger patients with stage IV disease, current smokers also had worse survival compared with former smokers who quit >12 months before diagnosis. It is likely that tumor biology plays a major role in the differences observed; however, to improve survival, it is prudent to encourage all smokers to quit smoking if they are diagnosed with NSCLC. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society. Patients who are smoking at the time of diagnosis have worse survival compared with never smokers. Although some of these differences probably are related to tumor biology, to improve survival, it is prudent to encourage all smokers to quit smoking if they are diagnosed with non–small cell lung cancer.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherSmokingen_US
dc.subject.otherPrognosisen_US
dc.subject.otherSurvival Analysisen_US
dc.subject.otherSmoking Cessationen_US
dc.subject.otherNon–Small Cell Lung Canceren_US
dc.titleSmoking status and survival in the national comprehensive cancer network non–small cell lung cancer cohorten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherRoswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New Yorken_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe Ohio State University College of Public Health and the Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohioen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, Californiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNational Comprehensive Cancer Network, Fort Washington, Pennsylvaniaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDuke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolinaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texasen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe Ohio State University College of Medicine and the Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohioen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe Ohio State University College of Public Health, 310 Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210en_US
dc.identifier.pmid23023590en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/96341/1/27824_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.27824en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCanceren_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaser S, Shannon VR, Eapen GA, et al. Smoking cessation after diagnosis of lung cancer is associated with a beneficial effect on performance status. Chest. 2006; 130: 1784 ‐ 1790.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTammemagi CM, Neslund‐Dudas C, Simoff M, Kvale P. Smoking and lung cancer survival: the role of comorbidity and treatment. Chest. 2004; 125: 27 ‐ 37.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBryant A, Cerfolio RJ. Differences in epidemiology, histology, and survival between cigarette smokers and never‐smokers who develop non–small cell lung cancer. Chest. 2007; 132: 185 ‐ 192.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEbbert JO, Williams BA, Sun Z, et al. Duration of smoking abstinence as a predictor for non–small‐cell lung cancer survival in women. Lung Cancer. 2005; 47: 165 ‐ 172.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNia PS, Weyler J, Colpaert C, Vermeulen P, Marck EV, Schil PV. Prognostic value of smoking status in operated non–small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2005; 47: 351 ‐ 359.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhou W, Heist RS, Liu G, et al. Smoking cessation before diagnosis and survival in early stage non–small cell lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer. 2006; 53: 375 ‐ 380.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCharlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis. 1987; 40: 373 ‐ 383.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShaw AT, Yeap BY, Solomon BJ, et al. Effect of crizotinib on overall survival in patients with advanced non–small‐cell lung cancer harbouring ALK gene rearrangement: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2011; 12: 1004 ‐ 1012.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSonobe M, Kobayashi M, Ishikawa M, et al. Impact of KRAS and EGFR gene mutations on recurrence and survival in patients with surgically resected lung adenocarcinomas. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012; 19 ( suppl 3 ): 347 ‐ 354.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSubramanian J, Govindan R. Molecular genetics of lung cancer in people who have never smoked. Lancet Oncol. 2008; 9: 676 ‐ 682.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParsons A, Daley A, Begh R, Aveyard P. Influence of smoking cessation after diagnosis of early stage lung cancer on prognosis: systematic review of observational studies with meta‐analysis [serial online]. BMJ. 2010; 340: b5569.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHerbst RS, Heymach JV, Lippman SM. Molecular origins of cancer: lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359: 1367 ‐ 1380.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceToh CK, Wong EH, Lim WT, et al. The impact of smoking status on the behavior and survival outcome of patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis. Chest. 2004; 126: 1750 ‐ 1756.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGillum RF, Kwagyan J, Obisesan TO. Smoking, cognitive function and mortality in a US national cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011; 8: 3628 ‐ 3636.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeguid RA, Hooker CM, Harris J, et al. Long‐term survival outcomes by smoking status in surgical and nonsurgical patients with non–small cell lung cancer: comparing never smokers and current smokers. Chest. 2010; 138: 500 ‐ 509.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBalduyck B, Nia PS, Cogen A, et al. The effect of smoking cessation on quality of life after lung cancer surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011; 40: 1432 ‐ 1437.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceErhunmwunsee L, Onaitis MW. Smoking cessation and the success of lung cancer surgery. Curr Oncol Rep. 2009l; 11: 269 ‐ 274.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMason DP, Subramanian S, Nowicki ER, et al. Impact of smoking cessation before resection of lung cancer: a Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009; 88: 362 ‐ 370.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRugg T, Saunders MI, Dische S. Smoking and mucosal reactions to radiotherapy. Br J Radiol. 1990; 63: 554 ‐ 556.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTucker MA, Murray N, Shaw EG, et al. Second primary cancers related to smoking and treatment of small‐cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Working Cadre. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997; 89: 1782 ‐ 1788.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRichardson GE, Tucker MA, Venzon DJ, et al. Smoking cessation after successful treatment of small‐cell lung cancer is associated with fewer smoking‐related second primary cancers. Ann Intern Med. 1993; 119: 383 ‐ 390.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKawahara M, Ushijima S, Kamimori T, et al. Second primary tumours in more than 2‐year disease‐free survivors of small‐cell lung cancer in Japan: the role of smoking cessation. Br J Cancer. 1998; 78: 409 ‐ 412.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.