Show simple item record

Single‐fraction radiotherapy versus multifraction radiotherapy for palliation of painful vertebral bone metastases—Equivalent efficacy, less toxicity, more convenient

dc.contributor.authorHowell, David D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJames, Jennifer L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHartsell, William F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSuntharalingam, Mohanen_US
dc.contributor.authorMachtay, Mitchellen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuh, John H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDemas, William F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSandler, Howard M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKachnic, Lisa A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBerk, Lawrence B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-12T19:01:10Z
dc.date.available2014-04-02T15:08:08Zen_US
dc.date.issued2013-02-15en_US
dc.identifier.citationHowell, David D.; James, Jennifer L.; Hartsell, William F.; Suntharalingam, Mohan; Machtay, Mitchell; Suh, John H.; Demas, William F.; Sandler, Howard M.; Kachnic, Lisa A.; Berk, Lawrence B. (2013). "Single‐fraction radiotherapy versus multifraction radiotherapy for palliation of painful vertebral bone metastases—Equivalent efficacy, less toxicity, more convenient ." Cancer 119(4): 888-896. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96380>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0008-543Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96380
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trial 97‐14 revealed no difference between radiation delivered for painful bone metastases at a dose of 8 gray (Gy) in 1 fraction (single‐fraction radiotherapy [SFRT]) and 30 Gy in 10 fractions (multifraction radiotherapy [MFRT]) in pain relief or narcotic use 3 months after randomization. SFRT for painful vertebral bone metastases (PVBM) has not been well accepted, possibly because of concerns about efficacy and toxicity. In the current study, the authors evaluated the subset of patients that was treated specifically for patients with PVBM. METHODS: PVBM included the cervical, thoracic, and/or lumbar spine regions. Among patients with PVBM, differences in retreatment rates and in pain relief, narcotic use, and toxicity 3 months after randomization were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 909 eligible patients, 235 (26%) had PVBM. Patients with and without PVBM differed in terms of the percentage of men (55% vs 47%, respectively; P = .03) and the proportion of patients with multiple painful sites (57% vs 38%, respectively; P < .01). Among those with PVBM, more patients who received MFRT had multiple sites treated (65% vs 49% for MFRT vs SFRT, respectively; P = .02). There were no statistically significant treatment differences in terms of pain relief (62% vs 70% for MFRT vs SFRT, respectively; P = .59) or freedom from narcotic use (24% vs 27%, respectively; P = .76) at 3 months. Significant differences in acute grade 2 through 4 toxicity (20% vs 10% for MFRT vs SFRT, respectively; P = .01) and acute grade 2 through 4 gastrointestinal toxicity (14% vs 6%, respectively; P = .01) were observed at 3 months, with lower toxicities seen in the patients treated with SFRT. Late toxicity was rare. No myelopathy was recorded. SFRT produced higher 3‐year retreatment rates (5% vs 15%; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Results for the subset of patients with PVBM in the RTOG 94‐17 randomized controlled trial were comparable to those for the entire population. SFRT produced less acute toxicity and a higher rate of retreatment than MFRT. SFRT and MFRT resulted in comparable pain relief and narcotic use at 3 months. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society. Single‐fraction radiation therapy and multifraction radiation therapy for painful vertebral bone metastases result in comparable pain relief and freedom from narcotic use at 3 months in a subset analysis of patients from the randomized, controlled trial Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 97‐14.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherPalliative Careen_US
dc.subject.otherRadiation Oncologyen_US
dc.subject.otherLate Effectsen_US
dc.subject.otherSpine Malignancyen_US
dc.subject.otherStereotactic Radiation Therapyen_US
dc.subject.otherSingle‐Fraction Radiationen_US
dc.subject.otherMetastasesen_US
dc.subject.otherSupportive Careen_US
dc.subject.otherPain Managementen_US
dc.subject.otherBone Metastasesen_US
dc.titleSingle‐fraction radiotherapy versus multifraction radiotherapy for palliation of painful vertebral bone metastases—Equivalent efficacy, less toxicity, more convenienten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, UHB2C490, SPC 5010, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109‐5010en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Floridaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherRadiation Therapy Oncology Group Statistical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvaniaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Advocate Good Shepherd Hospital, Barrington, Illinoisen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvaniaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohioen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Jean and Milton Cooper Cancer Center, Summa Akron City Hospital, Akron, Ohioen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, Californiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusettsen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohioen_US
dc.identifier.pmid23165743en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/96380/1/27616_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.27616en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCanceren_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChow E, Harris K, Fan G, et al. Palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 1423 ‐ 1436.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacbeth FR, Wheldon TE, Girling DJ, et al. Radiation myelopathy: estimates of risk in 1048 patients in 3 randomized trials of palliative radiotherapy for non‐small cell lung cancer. The Medical Research Council Lung Cancer Working Party. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1996; 8: 176 ‐ 181.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaranzano E, Latini P, Perrucci E, et al. Short‐course radiotherapy (8 Gy ×2) in metastatic spinal cord compression: an effective and feasible treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997; 38: 1037 ‐ 1044.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaranzano E, Trippa F, Casale M, et al. Eight‐gray single‐dose radiotherapy is effective in metastatic spinal cord compression: results of a phase III randomized multicentre Italian trial. Radiother Oncol. 2009; 93: 174 ‐ 179.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHowell DD, Lutz ST, Wood SL, Jagsi R. Cost comparisons for a course of radiation therapy for painful bone metastases from breast cancer using different technologies and fraction schema [abstract 152]. Paper presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Symposium; San Francisco, CA; October 8‐10, 2009.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMizumoto M, Harada H, Asakura H, et al. Radiotherapy for patients with metastases to the spinal column: a review of 603 patients at Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 79: 208 ‐ 213.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNguyen J, Chow E, Zeng L, et al. Palliative response and functional interference outcomes using the brief pain inventory for spinal bony metastases treated with conventional radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2011; 23: 485 ‐ 491.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrotti A, Byhardt R, Stetz J, et al. Common Toxicity Criteria: version 2.0. An improved reference for grading the acute effects of cancer treatment: impact on radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000; 47: 13 ‐ 47.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCleeland CS. Measurement of pain by subjective report. In: Chapman CR, Loeser JD, eds. Issues in Pain Measurement, Volume 12: Advances in Pain Research and Therapy. New York: Raven Press; 1989: 391 ‐ 403.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKachnic L, Berk L. Palliative single‐fraction radiation therapy: how much more evidence is needed? J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005; 97: 786 ‐ 788. Erratum in: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1095.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHartsell WF, Konski AA, Lo SS, Hayman JA. Single fraction radiotherapy for bone metastases: clinically effective, time efficient, cost conscious and still underutilized in the United States? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2009; 21: 652 ‐ 654.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFairchild A, Harris K, Barnes E, et al. Palliative thoracic radiotherapy for lung cancer: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 4001 ‐ 4011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHartsell WF, Scott CB, Bruner DW, et al. Randomized trial of short‐ versus long‐course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005; 97: 798 ‐ 804.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWu JS, Wong R, Johnston M, et al. Meta‐analysis of dose‐fractionation radiotherapy trials for the palliation of painful bone metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003; 55: 594 ‐ 605.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSze WM, Shelley MD, Held I, et al. Palliation of metastatic bone pain: single fraction versus multifraction radiotherapy—a systematic review of randomised trials. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2003; 15: 345 ‐ 352.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.