Show simple item record

Carbohydrate antigen 19‐9 is a prognostic and predictive biomarker in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who receive gemcitabine‐containing chemotherapy

dc.contributor.authorBauer, Todd M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEl‐rayes, Bassel F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLi, Xiaobaien_US
dc.contributor.authorHammad, Naziken_US
dc.contributor.authorPhilip, Philip A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorShields, Anthony F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZalupski, Mark M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBekaii‐saab, Taniosen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-12T19:01:20Z
dc.date.available2014-03-03T15:09:25Zen_US
dc.date.issued2013-01-15en_US
dc.identifier.citationBauer, Todd M.; El‐rayes, Bassel F. ; Li, Xiaobai; Hammad, Nazik; Philip, Philip A.; Shields, Anthony F.; Zalupski, Mark M.; Bekaii‐saab, Tanios (2013). "Carbohydrate antigen 19â 9 is a prognostic and predictive biomarker in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who receive gemcitabineâ containing chemotherapy." Cancer 119(2): 285-292. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96409>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0008-543Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96409
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Carbohydrate antigen 19‐9 (CA19‐9) is a widely used biomarker in pancreatic cancer. There is no consensus on the interpretation of the change in CA19‐9 serum levels and its role in the clinical management of patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Individual patient data from 6 prospective trials evaluating gemcitabine‐containing regimens from 3 different institutions were pooled. CA19‐9 values were obtained at baseline and after successive cycles of treatment. The objective of this study was to correlate a decline in CA19‐9 with outcomes while undergoing treatment. RESULTS: A total of 212 patients with locally advanced (n = 50) or metastatic (n = 162) adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were included. Median baseline CA19‐9 level was 1077 ng/mL (range, 15‐492,241 ng/mL). Groups were divided into those levels below (low) or above (high) the median. Median overall survival (mOS) was 8.7 versus 5.2 months ( P = .0018) and median time to progression (mTTP) was 5.8 versus 3.7 months ( P = .082) in the low versus high groups, respectively. After 2 cycles of chemotherapy, up to a 5% increase versus ≥ 5% increase in CA19‐9 levels conferred an improved mOS (10.3 vs 5.1 months, P = .0022) and mTTP (7.5 vs 3.5 months, P = 0.0005). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who have advanced pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine‐containing regimens baseline CA19‐9 is prognostic for outcome. A decline in CA19‐9 after the second cycle of chemotherapy is not predictive of improved mOS or mTTP; thus, CA19‐9 decline is not a useful surrogate endpoint in clinical trials. Clinically, a ≥ 5% rise in CA19‐9 after 2 cycles of chemotherapy serves as a negative predictive marker. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society. Baseline carbohydrate antigen 19‐9 (CA19‐9) is prognostic for outcomes in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Change in CA19‐9 serum level up to a 5% increase from baseline remains predictive for response to gemcitabine‐containing therapy, and thus should be considered a negative predictor.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherPancreaticen_US
dc.subject.otherPrognosticen_US
dc.subject.otherPredictiveen_US
dc.subject.otherOutcomesen_US
dc.subject.otherCarbohydrate Antigen 19‐9en_US
dc.subject.otherGemcitabineen_US
dc.titleCarbohydrate antigen 19‐9 is a prognostic and predictive biomarker in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who receive gemcitabine‐containing chemotherapyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohioen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, A454 Starling Loving Hall, 320 West 10th Avenue; Columbus, OH 43210; Fax: (614) 293‐9469en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Oncology, Cancer Center of Southeastern Ontario, Queens University, Kingston, Canadaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCenter for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohioen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgiaen_US
dc.identifier.pmid22786786en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/96409/1/27734_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.27734en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCanceren_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996; 15: 361 ‐ 387.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoeck S, Stieber P, Holdenrieder S, Wilkowski R, Heinemann V. Prognostic and therapeutic significance of carbohydrate antigen 19‐9 as tumor marker in patients with pancreatic cancer. Oncology. 2006; 70: 255 ‐ 264.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevon Rosen A, Linder S, Harmenberg U, Pegert S. Serum levels of CA 19‐9 and CA 50 in relation to Lewis blood cell status in patients with malignant and benign pancreatic disease. Pancreas. 1993; 8: 160 ‐ 165.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTempero MA, Uchida E, Takasaki H, Burnett DA, Steplewski Z, Pour PM. Relationship of carbohydrate antigen 19‐9 and Lewis antigens in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 1987; 47: 5501 ‐ 5503.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCastellanos E, Berlin J, Cardin DB. Current treatment options for pancreatic carcinoma. Curr Oncol Rep. 2011; 13: 195 ‐ 205.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHammad N, Heilbrun LK, Philip PA, et al. CA19‐9 as a predictor of tumor response and survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine‐based chemotherapy. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2010; 6: 98 ‐ 105.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaisey NR, Norman AR, Hill A, Massey A, Oates J, Cunningham D. CA19‐9 as a prognostic factor in inoperable pancreatic cancer: the implication for clinical trials. Br J Cancer. 2005; 93: 740 ‐ 743.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaad ED, Machado MC, Wajsbrot D, et al. Pretreatment CA 19‐9 level as a prognostic factor in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine. Int J Gastrointest Cancer. 2002; 32: 35 ‐ 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReni M, Cereda S, Balzano G, et al. Carbohydrate antigen 19‐9 change during chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2009; 115: 2630 ‐ 2639.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHess V, Glimelius B, Grawe P, et al. CA 19‐9 tumour‐marker response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer enrolled in a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008; 9: 132 ‐ 138.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWasan HS, Springett GM, Chodkiewicz C, et al. CA 19‐9 as a biomarker in advanced pancreatic cancer patients randomised to gemcitabine plus axitinib or gemcitabine alone. Br J Cancer. 2009; 101: 1162 ‐ 1167.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGogas H, Lofts FJ, Evans TR, Daryanani S, Mansi JL. Are serial measurements of CA19‐9 useful in predicting response to chemotherapy in patients with inoperable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas? Br J Cancer. 1998; 77: 325 ‐ 328.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHalm U, Schumann T, Schiefke I, Witzigmann H, Mössner J, Keim V. Decrease of CA 19‐9 during chemotherapy with gemcitabine predicts survival time in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2000; 82: 1013 ‐ 1016.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStemmler J, Stieber P, Szymala AM, et al. Are serial CA 19‐9 kinetics helpful in predicting survival in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine and cisplatin? Onkologie. 2003; 26: 462 ‐ 467.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZiske C, Schlie C, Gorschlüter M, et al. Prognostic value of CA 19‐9 levels in patients with inoperable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated with gemcitabine. Br J Cancer. 2003; 89: 1413 ‐ 1417.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKo AH, Hwang J, Venook AP, Abbruzzese JL, Bergsland EK, Tempero MA. Serum CA19‐9 response as a surrogate for clinical outcome in patients receiving fixed‐dose rate gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005; 93: 195 ‐ 199.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartin LK, Li X, Kim SE, et al. A multi‐center phase II study of the combination of bevacizumab, fixed dose rate gemcitabine, and infusional 5‐fluorouracil in patients with advanced pancreas cancer. In: Proceedings of the 100th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; April 18‐22, 2009; Denver, CO. Philadelphia, PA: AACR; 2009. Abstract 4500.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhilip PA, Zalupski MM, Vaitkevicius VK, et al. Phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer. 2001; 92: 569 ‐ 577.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHill ME, Li X, Kim S, et al. A phase I study of the biomodulation of capecitabine by docetaxel and gemcitabine (mGTX) in previously untreated patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011; 67: 511 ‐ 517.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEl‐Rayes BF, Zalupski MM, Shields AF, et al. Phase II study of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and infusional fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21: 2920 ‐ 2925.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEl‐Rayes BF, Zalupski MM, Shields AF, et al. A phase II study of celecoxib, gemcitabine, and cisplatin in advanced pancreatic cancer. Invest New Drugs. 2005; 23: 583 ‐ 590.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKosuri KV, Bekaii‐Saab TS, Bender J, et al. Disrupting TNF signaling in pancreatic cancer: A phase I/II clinical study in patients with advanced disease [Abstract]. Proceedings of the 2005 ASCO Annual Meeting. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23 ( suppl ): abstract 4103.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWong D, Ko AH, Hwang J, Venook AP, Bergsland EK, Tempero MA. Serum CA19‐9 decline compared to radiographic response as a surrogate for clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer receiving chemotherapy. Pancreas. 2008; 37: 269 ‐ 274.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVon Hoff DD, Ramanathan RK, Borad MJ, et al. Gemcitabine plus nab‐paclitaxel is an active regimen in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I/II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29: 4548 ‐ 4554.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMamon HJ, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, et al; Cancer and Leukemia Group B. A phase 2 trial of gemcitabine, 5‐fluorouracil, and radiation therapy in locally advanced nonmetastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 80003. Cancer. 2011; 117: 2620 ‐ 2628.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSudo K, Yamaguchi T, Nakamura K, et al. Phase II study of S‐1 in patients with gemcitabine‐resistant advanced pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011; 67: 249 ‐ 254.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLipton A, Campbell‐Baird C, Witters L, Harvey H, Ali S. Phase II trial of gemcitabine, irinotecan, and celecoxib in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010; 44: 286 ‐ 288.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmall W Jr, Berlin J, Freedman GM, et al. Full‐dose gemcitabine with concurrent radiation therapy in patients with nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer: a multicenter phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 942 ‐ 947.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwets JA, Pickett RM. Evaluation of Diagnostic Systems: Methods From Signal Detection Theory. New York: Academic Press; 1982.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHerrmann R, Bodoky G, Ruhstaller T, et al. Gemcitabine plus capecitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research and the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 2212 ‐ 2217.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeinemann V, Quietzsch D, Gieseler F, et al. Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24: 3946 ‐ 3952.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStathopoulos GP, Syrigos K, Aravantinos G, et al. A multicenter phase III trial comparing irinotecan‐gemcitabine (IG) with gemcitabine (G) monotherapy as first‐line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006; 95: 587 ‐ 592.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCunningham D, Chau I, Stocken DD, et al. Phase III randomized comparison of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus capecitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 5513 ‐ 5518.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhilip PA, Benedetti J, Corless CL, et al. Phase III study comparing gemcitabine plus cetuximab versus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Southwest Oncology Group‐directed intergroup trial S0205. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 3605 ‐ 3610.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKindler HL, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, et al. Gemcitabine plus bevacizumab compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: phase III trial of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 80303). J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 3617 ‐ 3622.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009; 59: 225 ‐ 249.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRothenberg ML, Abbruzzese JL, Moore M, Portenoy RK, Robertson JM, Wanebo HJ. A rationale for expanding the endpoints for clinical trials in advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer. 1996; 78 ( 3 suppl ): 627 ‐ 632.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrambs HJ, Claussen CD. Pancreatic and ampullary carcinoma. Ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and angiography. Endoscopy. 1993; 25: 58 ‐ 68.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoprowski H, Herlyn M, Steplewski Z, Sears HF. Specific antigen in serum of patients with colon carcinoma. Science. 1981; 212: 53 ‐ 55.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.