Show simple item record

Data reuse and sensemaking among novice social scientists

dc.contributor.authorFaniel, Ixchel M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKriesberg, Adamen_US
dc.contributor.authorYakel, Elizabethen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-12T19:01:26Z
dc.date.available2013-02-12T19:01:26Z
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citationFaniel, Ixchel M.; Kriesberg, Adam; Yakel, Elizabeth (2012). "Data reuse and sensemaking among novice social scientists." Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 49(1): 1-10. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96429>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0044-7870en_US
dc.identifier.issn1550-8390en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96429
dc.description.abstractWe know little about the data reuse practices of novice data users. Yet large scale data reuse over the long term depends in part on uptake from early career researchers. This paper examines 22 novice social science researchers and how they make sense of social science data. Novices are particularly interested in understanding how data: 1) are transformed from qualitative to quantitative data, 2) capture concepts not well‐established in the literature, and 3) can be matched and merged across multiple datasets. We discuss how novice data users make sense of data in these three circumstances. We find that novices seek to understand the data producer's rationale for methodological procedures and measurement choices, which is broadly similar to researchers in other scientific communities. However we also find that they not only reflect on whether they can trust the data producers' decisions, but also seek guidance from members of their disciplinary community. Specifically, novice social science researchers are heavily influenced by more experienced social science researchers when it comes to discovering, evaluating, and justifying their reuse of other's data.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.titleData reuse and sensemaking among novice social scientistsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInformation and Library Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, School of Information, 105 S. State Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48019–1285en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, School of Information, 105 S. State Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48019–1285en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherOCLC Research, 6565 Kilgour Place, Dublin, OH 43017–3395en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/96429/1/14504901068_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/meet.14504901068en_US
dc.identifier.sourceProceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerg, M., & Goorman, E. ( 1999 ). The contextual nature of medical information. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 56 ( 1‐3 ), 51 – 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBirnholtz, J. P., & Bietz, M. ( 2003 ). Data at Work: Supporting Sharing in Science and Engineering. ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 339 – 348 ).Sanibel Island, FL.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarlson, S., & Anderson, B. ( 2007 ). What Are Data? The Many Kinds of Data and Their Implications for Data Re‐Use. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12 ( 2 ), 635 – 651.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCragin, M. H., & Shankar, K. ( 2006 ). Scientific Data Collections and Distributed Collective Practice. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 15 ( 2‐3 ), 185 – 204.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFaniel, I. M., & Jacobsen, T. E. ( 2010 ). Reusing Scientific Data: How Earthquake Engineering Researchers Assess the Reusability of Colleagues’ Data. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19, 355 – 375.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFaniel, I., & Yakel, E. ( 2011 ). Significant properties as contextual metadata. Journal of Library Metadata, 11 ( 3‐4 ), 155 – 165.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJirotka, M., Procter, R., Hartswood, M., Slack, R., Simpson, A., Coopmans, C., Hinds, C., et al.( 2005 ). Collaboration and Trust in Healthcare Innovation: The eDiaMoND CaseStudy. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 14, 369 – 398.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarasti, H., Baker, K. S., & Halkola, E. ( 2006 ). Enriching the Notion of Data Curation in E‐Science: Data Managing and Information Infrastructuring in the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2006, 321 – 358.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLave, J., & Wenger, E. ( 1991 ). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Science Board.( 2005 ). Long‐lived Digital Data Collections: Enabling Research and Education in the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePalmer, C. L. ( 1996 ). Information work at the boundaries of science: Linking Library services to research practices. Library Trends, 45 ( 2 ), 165 – 191.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePierce, S. J. ( 1999 ). Boundary crossing in research literatures as a means of interdisciplinary information transfer. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50 ( 3 ), 271 – 279.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchiff, L. R., Van House, N. A., & Butler, M. H. ( 1997 ). Understanding complex information environments: a social analysis of watershed planning. Proceedings of the second ACM international conference on Digital libraries, DL ‘97(pp. 161 – 168 ).New York, NY, USA: ACM.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan House, N.A., Butler, M. H., & Schiff, L. R. ( 1998 ). Cooperative Knowledge Work and Practices of Trust: Sharing Environmental Planning Data Sets. The ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 335 – 343 ).Seattle, Washington.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan House, N. A. ( 2002 ). Digital libraries and practices of trust: Networked biodiversity information. Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy, 16 ( 1 ), 99.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWallis, J. C., Milojevic, S., Borgman, C. L., & Sandoval, W. A. ( 2006 ). The Special Case of Scientific Data Sharing with Education. The American Society for Information Science & Technology (Vol. 43,pp. 169 – 181 ).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeeks, P., & Packard, J. M. ( 1997 ). Acceptance of Scientific Management by Natural Resource Dependent Communities. Conservation Biology, 11 ( 1 ), 236 – 245.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZimmerman, A. ( 2007 ). Not by metadata alone: The use of diverse forms of knowledge to locate data for reuse. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 7, 5 – 16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZimmerman, A. S. ( 2008 ). New Knowledge from Old Data: The Role of Standards in the Sharing and Reuse of Ecological Data. Science, Technology & Human Values, 33 ( 5 ), 631 – 652.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaker, K. S., & Yarmey, L. ( 2008 ). Data Stewardship: Environmental Data Curation and a Web‐of‐Repositories. 4th International Digital Curation Conference. Edinburgh, Scotland.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.