Effects Of Differing Response‐Force Requirements On Food‐Maintained Responding In Cd‐1 Mice
dc.contributor.author | Zarcone, Troy J. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, Rong | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Fowler, Stephen C. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-03-05T18:16:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-03-05T18:16:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007-11 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Zarcone, Troy J.; Chen, Rong; Fowler, Stephen C. (2007). "Effects Of Differing Response‐Force Requirements On Food‐Maintained Responding In Cd‐1 Mice." Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 88(3). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96652> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0022-5002 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1938-3711 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96652 | |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Effort | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Disk Press | en_US |
dc.subject.other | CD‐1 Mice | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Operant | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Force | en_US |
dc.title | Effects Of Differing Response‐Force Requirements On Food‐Maintained Responding In Cd‐1 Mice | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY DEPARTMENT, UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | LIFE SPAN INSTITUTE, UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 18047228 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/96652/1/jeab.2007.88-381.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1901/jeab.2007.88-381 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mowrer, O. H., & Jones, H. M. ( 1943 ). Extinction and behavioral variability as functions of effortfulness of task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33, 369 – 386. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Adair, E. R., & Wright, B. A. ( 1976 ). Behavioral thermoregulation in the squirrel monkey when response effort is varied. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 90, 179 – 184. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ailing, K., & Poling, A. ( 1995 ). The effects of differing response‐force requirements on fixed‐ratio responding of rats. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 331 – 346. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Baron, S. P., & Meltzer, L. T. ( 2001 ). Mouse strains differ under a simple schedule of operant learning. Behavior and Brain Research, 118, 143 – 152. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Blough, D. S. ( 1966 ). The study of animal sensory processes by operant methods. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 245 – 379 ). New York: Appleton‐Century‐Crofts. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Catania, A. C. ( 1998 ). Learning. ( 4th ed. ). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Chung, S. H. ( 1965 ). Effects of effort on response rate. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 17, 1 – 7. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. ( 1957 ). Schedules of reinforcement. Englewood Cliffs, N: Prentice‐Hall. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Festing, M. F. ( 1999 ). Warning: the use of heterogeneous mice may seriously damage your research. Neurbiology of Aging, 20, 237 – 244. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fowler, S. C. ( 1987 ). Force and duration of operant response as dependent variables in behavioral pharmacology. In T. Thompson, P. B. Dews, & J. E. Barrett (Eds.), Advances in behavioral pharmacology: Vol. 6. Neurobehavioral pharmacology (pp. 83 – 127 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gerlai, R. ( 1998 ). A new continuous alternation task in T‐maze detects hippocampal dysfunction in mice. A strain comparison and lesion study. Behaviorand Brain Research, 95, 91 – 101. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gerlai, R., Adams, B., Fitch, T., Chaney, S., & Baez, M. ( 2002 ). Performance deficits of mGluR8 knockout mice in learning tasks: The effects of null mutation and the background genotype. Neuropharmacology, 43, 35 – 249. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Jobsis, F. F., & Duffield, J. C. ( 1967, June 9 ). Force, shortening, and work in muscular contraction: Relative contributions to overall energy utilization. Science, 156, 1388 – 1392. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Killeen, P. R. ( 1995 ). Ecologies, economics and mechanics: The dynamics of responding under conditions of varying motivation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 405 – 431. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | McClearn, G. E. ( 1999 ). Exotic mice as models for aging research: Polemic and prospectus by Miller R. et al. Neurobiology of Aging, 20, 233 – 236. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Miller, L. K. ( 1968 ). Escape from an effortful situation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 619 – 627. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Miller, R. A., Austad, S., Burke, D., Chrisp, C., Dysko, R., Galecki, A., et al. ( 1999 ). Exotic mice as models for aging research: Polemic and prospectus. Neurobiology of Aging, 20, 217 – 231. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Notterman, J. M., & Mintz, D. E. ( 1965 ). Dynamics of response. New York: Wiley. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Richardson, N. R., & Roberts, D. C. ( 1996 ). Progressive ratio schedules in drug self‐administration studies in rats: A method to evaluate reinforcing efficacy. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 66, 1 – 11. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Solomon, R. L. ( 1948 ). The influence of work on behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 45, 1 – 40. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Stafford, D., LeSage, M. G., & Glowa, J. R. ( 1998 ). Progressive‐ratio schedules of drug delivery in the analysis of drug self‐administration: A review. Psycho-harmacology (Berlin), 139, 169 – 184. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Trotter, J. ( 1956 ). The physical properties of bar‐pressing behaviour and the problem of reactive inhibition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 8, 97 – 106. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wenger, G. R., Schmidt, C., & Davisson, M. T. ( 2004 ). Operant conditioning in the Ts65Dn mouse: Learning. Behavior Genetics, 34, 105 – 119. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zarcone, T.J., Chen, R., & Fowler, S.C. ( 2004 ). Differential acquisition of food‐reinforced disk pressing by CD‐1, BALB/cJ and C57BL/6J mice. Behavior and Brain Research, 152, 1 – 9. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zarcone, T. J., & Fowler, S. C. ( 2001 ). Digital measurement of operant disk press force maintained in CD‐1, BALB/c, and C57BL/6 mice. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 33, 415 – 421. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.