View Item 

Show simple item record

Non‐response adjustment of survey estimates based on auxiliary variables subject to error

dc.contributor.authorWest, Brady T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLittle, Roderick J. A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-05T18:17:13Z
dc.date.available2014-05-01T14:28:08Zen_US
dc.date.issued2013-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationWest, Brady T.; Little, Roderick J. A. (2013). "Non‐response adjustment of survey estimates based on auxiliary variables subject to error." Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics) 62(2). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96670>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0035-9254en_US
dc.identifier.issn1467-9876en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96670
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherNon‐Response Adjustment of Survey Estimatesen_US
dc.subject.otherAuxiliary Variablesen_US
dc.subject.otherPattern–Mixture Modelsen_US
dc.subject.otherPanel Arbeitsmarkt Und Soziale Sicherung (Labour Market and Social Security) Surveyen_US
dc.subject.otherMeasurement Erroren_US
dc.subject.otherNon‐Ignorable Missing Dataen_US
dc.titleNon‐response adjustment of survey estimates based on auxiliary variables subject to erroren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelStatistics and Numeric Dataen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/96670/1/j.1467-9876.2012.01058.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1467-9876.2012.01058.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics)en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaghunathan, T. E., Lepkowski, J. M., Van Hoewyk, J. and Solenberger, P. ( 2001 ) A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models. Surv. Methodol., 27, 85 – 95.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGroves, R. M. ( 2006 ) Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Publ. Opin. Q., 70, 646 – 675.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGroves, R. M., Wagner, J. and Peytcheva, E. ( 2007 ) Use of interviewer judgments about attributes of selected respondents in post‐survey adjustments for unit nonresponse: an illustration with the National Survey of Family Growth. Proc. Surv. Res. Meth. Sect. Am. Statist. Ass.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeeringa, S. G., West, B. T. and Berglund, P. A. ( 2010 ) Applied Survey Data Analysis. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall–CRC Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKreuter, F., Olson, K., Wagner, J., Yan, T., Ezzati‐Rice, T. M., Casas‐Cordero, C., Lemay, M., Peytchev, A., Groves, R. M. and Raghunathan, T. E. ( 2010 ) Using proxy measures and other correlates of survey outcomes to adjust for non‐response: examples from multiple surveys. J. R. Statist. Soc. A, 173, 389 – 407.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLessler, J. and Kalsbeek, W. ( 1992 ) Nonresponse: dealing with the problem. In Nonsampling Errors in Surveys, ch. 8. New York: Wiley‐Interscience.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLittle, R. J. A. ( 1994 ) A class of pattern‐mixture models for normal incomplete data. Biometrika, 81, 471 – 483.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLittle, R. J. A. and Rubin, D. B. ( 2002 ) Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, 2nd edn. Hoboken: Wiley‐Interscience.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLittle, R. J. A. and Vartivarian, S. ( 2003 ) On weighting the rates in nonresponse weights. Statist. Med., 22, 1589 – 1599.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLittle, R. J. A. and Vartivarian, S. ( 2005 ) Does weighting for nonresponse increase the variance of survey means? Surv. Methodol., 31, 161 – 168.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLittle, R. J. A. and Wang, Y. ( 1996 ) Pattern‐mixture models for multivariate incomplete data with covariates. Biometrics, 52, 98 – 111.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLumley, T. ( 2010 ) Complex Surveys: a Guide to Analysis using R. Hoboken: Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCulloch, S. K., Kreuter, F. and Calvano, S. ( 2010 ) Interviewer observed vs. reported respondent gender: implications on measurement error. A. Meet. American Association for Public Opinion Research, Chicago, May 14th.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePickering, K., Thomas, R. and Lynn, P. ( 2003 ) Testing the shadow sample approach for the English House Condition survey. Report. National Centre for Social Research, London.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR Development Core Team ( 2011 ) R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRubin, D. B. ( 1976 ) Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63, 581 – 592.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRubin, D. B. ( 1987 ) Multiple Imputation for Non‐response in Surveys. New York: Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShardell, M., Hicks, G. E., Miller, R. R., Langenberg, P. and Magaziner, J. ( 2010 ) Pattern‐mixture models for analyzing normal outcome data with proxy respondents. Statist. Med., 29, 1522 – 1538.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStataCorp ( 2011 ) Stata Statistical Software: Release 12. College Station: StataCorp.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTipping, S. and Sinibaldi, J. ( 2010 ) Examining the trade off between sampling and targeted non‐response error in a targeted non‐response follow‐up. Int. Total Survey Error Wrkshp, Stowe, June 15th.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrappmann, M., Gundert, S., Wenzig, C. and Gebhardt, D. ( 2010 ) PASS: a household panel survey for research on unemployment and poverty. Schmoll. Jahrb. Zeits. Wirtschafts. Sozialwissen., 130, 609 – 622.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWest, B. T. ( 2013 ) An examination of the quality and utility of interviewer observations in the National Survey of Family Growth. J. R. Statist. Soc. A, 176, in the press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndridge, R. R. and Little, R. J. A. ( 2009 ) Extensions of proxy pattern‐mixture analysis for survey non‐response. Proc. Surv. Res. Meth. Sect. Am. Statist. Ass., 2468 – 2482.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndridge, R. R. and Little, R. J. A. ( 2011 ) Proxy pattern‐mixture analysis for survey nonresponse. J. Off. Statist., 27, 153 – 180.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaskin, R. M., Zuvekas, S. H. and Ezzati‐Rice, T. M. ( 2011 ) Proxy pattern‐mixture analysis of missing health expenditure variables in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Int. Total Survey Error Wrkshp, Quebec, June 21st.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeaumont, J.‐F. ( 2005 ) On the use of data collection process information for the treatment of unit non‐response through weight adjustment. Surv. Methodol., 31, 227 – 231.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBethlehem, J. ( 2002 ) Weighting nonresponse adjustments based on auxiliary information. In Survey Nonresponse (eds R. Groves, D. Dillman, J. Eltinge and R. Little ), pp. 275 – 287. New York: Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCampanelli, P., Sturgis, P. and Purdon, S. ( 1997 ) Can You Hear Me Knocking: an Investigation into the Impact of Interviewers on Survey Response Rates. London: Social and Community Planning Research.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiSogra, C., Dennis, J. M. and Fahimi, M. ( 2010 ) On the quality of ancillary data available for address‐based sampling. Prac. Surv. Res. Meth. Sect. Am. Statist. Ass., 4174 – 4183.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFuller, W. ( 1987 ) A single explanatory variable. In Measurement Error Models, ch. 1. New York: Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S. and Rubin, D. B. ( 2004 ) Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edn. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall–CRC Press.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1467-9876.2012.01058.x.pdf
Size:
627.5KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.