Show simple item record

Longitudinal association between medication adherence and glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes

dc.contributor.authorAikens, J. E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPiette, J. D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-05T18:17:19Z
dc.date.available2014-05-01T14:28:09Zen_US
dc.date.issued2013-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationAikens, J. E.; Piette, J. D. (2013). "Longitudinal association between medication adherence and glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes." Diabetic Medicine (3): 338-344. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96675>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0742-3071en_US
dc.identifier.issn1464-5491en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96675
dc.description.abstractAim Despite the widespread assumption that adherence drives glycaemic control, there is little published support for this in Type 2 diabetes. The study objective was to determine whether self‐reported medication adherence predicts future glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes, after accounting for baseline control. Methods Medication adherence (4‐item Morisky scale), glycaemic control (HbA 1c %), and other variables were assessed in 287 adult primary care patients prescribed oral medication (40% also on insulin) for Type 2 diabetes. Glycaemic control was reassessed 6 months later. Regression analyses examined concurrent and future glycaemic control as a function of baseline medication adherence after adjustment for baseline glycaemia and other potential confounders. Results Only half of patients reported high adherence. Cross‐sectional adjusted analysis replicated prior reports of an adherence‐HbA 1c association ( P  = 0.011). Even after adjusting for baseline HbA 1c , each one‐point increase in baseline Morisky total score was associated with a 1.8 mmol/mol (or 0.16%) increase in HbA 1c measured 6 months later. Additionally, baseline endorsement of forgetting to take medication was associated with a 4.7 mmol/mol (or 0.43%) increase in 6‐month HbA 1c ( P  = 0.005). This effect persisted after adjusting for psychological distress and did not vary by key demographic and medical features. Conclusions Even after stringent adjustment for baseline glycaemic control, self‐reported adherence to diabetes medication predicts long‐term glycaemic control. The Morisky scale is an easy‐to‐use clinical tool to identify patients whose glycaemic control will subsequently worsen, regardless of age, gender and psychological distress.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.titleLongitudinal association between medication adherence and glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid23075262en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/96675/1/dme12046.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/dme.12046en_US
dc.identifier.sourceDiabetic Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAikens JE, Perkins DW, Lipton B, Piette JD. Longitudinal analysis of depressive symptoms and glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 1177 – 1181.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAikens JE, Nease DE Jr, Nau DP, Klinkman MS, Schwenk TL. Adherence to maintenance‐phase antidepressant medication as a function of patient beliefs about medication. Ann Fam Med 2005; 3: 23 – 30. Erratum in: Ann Fam Med 2005; 3: 558.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFitzgerald JT, Davis WK, Connell CM, Hess GE, Funnell MM, Hiss RG. Development and validation of the Diabetes Care Profile. Eval Health Prof 1996; 19: 208 – 230.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePolonsky WH, Anderson BJ, Lohrer PA, Welch G, Jacobson AM, Aponte JE et al. Assessment of diabetes‐related distress. Diabetes Care 1995; 18: 754 – 760.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ‐9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001; 16: 606 – 613.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUS Bureau of the Census. Methodology and scores of the socioeconomic status, working paper no. 15. Fed Regist 2002; 67: 6931 – 6933.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAikens J. Prospective associations between emotional distress and poor outcomes in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2012, [Epub ahead of print].en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAikens JE, Perkins DW, Piette JD, Lipton B. Association between depression and concurrent Type 2 diabetes outcomes varies by diabetes regimen. Diabet Med 2008; 25: 1324 – 1329.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeorge J, Shalansky SJ. Predictors of refill non‐adherence in patients with heart failure. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007; 63: 488 – 493.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrousel‐Wood M, Islam T, Webber LS, Re RN, Morisky DE, Muntner P. New medication adherence scale versus pharmacy fill rates in seniors with hypertension. Am J Manag Care 2009; 15: 59 – 66.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaini SD, Schoenfeld P, Kaulback K, Dubinsky MC. Effect of medication dosing frequency on adherence in chronic diseases. Am J Manag Care 2009; 15: e22 – e33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePiette JD, Weinberger M, Kraemer FB, McPhee SJ. Impact of automated calls with nurse follow‐up on diabetes treatment outcomes in a Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 202 – 208.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBosworth HB, Granger BB, Mendys P, Brindis R, Burkholder R, Czajkowski SM et al. Medication adherence: a call for action. Am Heart J 2011; 162: 412 – 424.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGranger BB, Bosworth HB. Medication adherence: emerging use of technology. Curr Opin Cardiol 2011; 26: 279 – 287.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePossidente CJ, Bucci KK, McClain WJ. Motivational interviewing: a tool to improve medication adherence? Am J Health Syst Pharm 2005; 62: 1311 – 1314.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCramer JA. A systematic review of adherence with medications for diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 1218 – 1224.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAsche C, LaFleur J, Conner C. A review of diabetes treatment adherence and the association with clinical and economic outcomes. Clin Ther 2011; 33: 74 – 109.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLawrence DB, Ragucci KR, Long LB, Parris BS, Helfer LA. Relationship of oral antihyperglycemic (sulfonylurea or metformin) medication adherence and hemoglobin A1c goal attainment for HMO patients enrolled in a diabetes disease management program. J Manag Care Pharm 2006; 12: 466 – 471.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHorswell RL, Wascom CK, Cerise FP, Besse JA, Johnson JK. Diabetes mellitus medication assistance program: relationship of effectiveness to adherence. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2008; 19: 677 – 686.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdams AS, Trinacty CM, Zhang F, Kleinman K, Grant RW, Meigs JB et al. Medication adherence and racial differences in A1C control. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 916 – 921.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRozenfeld Y, Hunt JS, Plauschinat C, Wong KS. Oral antidiabetic medication adherence and glycemic control in managed care. Am J Manag Care 2008; 14: 71 – 75.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKindmalm L, Melander A, Nilsson JLG. Refill adherence of antihyperglycaemic drugs related to glucose control (HbA1c) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Acta Diabetol 2007; 44: 209 – 213.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonnelly LA, Morris AD, Evans JMM, for the DARTS/MEMO collaboration. Adherence to insulin and its association with glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Q J Med 2007; 100: 345 – 350.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePladevall M, Williams LK, Potts LA, Divine G, Xi H, Lafata JE. Clinical outcomes and adherence to medications measured by claims data in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 2800 – 2805.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlonde L, Wogen J, Kreilick C, Seymour AA. Greater reductions in A1C in type 2 diabetic patients new to therapy with glyburide/metformin tablets as compared to glyburide co‐administered with metformin. Diabetes Obes Metab 2003; 5: 424 – 431.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrapek K, King K, Warren SS, George KG, Caputo DA, Mihelich K et al. Medication adherence and associated hemoglobin A1c in type 2 diabetes. Ann Pharmacother 2004; 38: 1357 – 1362.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeisler M, Faul JD, Hayward RA, Langa KM, Blaum C, Weir D. Mechanisms for racial and ethnic disparities in glycemic control in middle‐aged and older Americans in the health and retirement study. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 1853 – 1860.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePiette JD, Wagner TH, Potter MB, Schillinger D. Health insurance status, cost‐related medication underuse, and outcomes among diabetes patients in three systems of care. Med Care 2004; 42: 102 – 109.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuillausseau PJ. Influence of oral antidiabetic drugs compliance on metabolic control in type 2 diabetes. A survey in general practice. Diabetes Metab 2003; 29: 79 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParchman ML, Pugh JA, Wang C‐P, Romero RL. Glucose control, self‐care behaviors, and the presence of the chronic care model in primary care clinics. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 2849 – 2854.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRhee MK, Slocum W, Ziemer DC, Culler SD, Cook CB, El‐Kebbi IM et al. Patient adherence improves glycemic control. Diabetes Educ 2005; 31: 240 – 250.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarber MCPMA, Nau DPP, Erickson SRP, Aikens JEP, Lawrence JBMBA. The concordance of self‐report with other measures of medication adherence: a summary of the literature. Med Care 2004; 42: 649 – 652.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorisky DE, Green LW, Levine DM. Concurrent and predictive validity of a self‐reported measure of medication adherence. Med Care 1986; 24: 67 – 74.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCass AR, Volk RJ, Nease DE Jr. Health‐related quality of life in primary care patients with recognized and unrecognized mood and anxiety disorders. Int J Psychiatry Med 1999; 29: 293 – 309.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.