View Item 

Show simple item record

Quantification Of Drug Choice With The Generalized Matching Law In Rhesus Monkeys

dc.contributor.authorKoffarnus, Mikhail N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWoods, James H.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-05T18:18:06Z
dc.date.available2013-03-05T18:18:06Z
dc.date.issued2008-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationKoffarnus, Mikhail N.; Woods, James H. (2008). "Quantification Of Drug Choice With The Generalized Matching Law In Rhesus Monkeys." Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 89(2). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96763>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-5002en_US
dc.identifier.issn1938-3711en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96763
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.subject.otherRhesus Monkeysen_US
dc.subject.otherMatching Lawen_US
dc.subject.otherSelf‐Administrationen_US
dc.subject.otherRemifentanilen_US
dc.subject.otherCocaineen_US
dc.subject.otherMethohexitalen_US
dc.subject.otherLever Pressen_US
dc.titleQuantification Of Drug Choice With The Generalized Matching Law In Rhesus Monkeysen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANen_US
dc.identifier.pmid18422019en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/96763/1/jeab.2008.89-209.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1901/jeab.2008.89-209en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavioren_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMotulsky, H. J., & Christopoulos, A. ( 2003 ). Fitting models to biological data using linear and nonlinear regression: A practical guide to curve fitting. San Diego, CA: GraphPad Software, Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavison, M. ( 1988 ). Concurrent schedules: Interaction of reinforcer frequency and reinforcer duration. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 339 – 349.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavison, M., & Baum, W. M. ( 2003 ). Every reinforcer counts: Reinforcer magnitude and local preference. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 80, 95 – 129.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavison, M., & Baum, W. M. ( 2006 ). Do conditional reinforcers count Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 86, 269 – 283.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavison, M., & Hogsden, I. ( 1984 ). Concurrent variable‐interval schedule performance: Fixed versus mixed reinforcer durations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 169 – 182.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGaluska, C. M., Winger, G., Hursh, S. R., & Woods, J. H. ( 2006 ). Assessing unit‐price related remifentanil choice in rhesus monkeys. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 86, 181 – 195.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHerrnstein, R. J. ( 1961 ). Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 267 – 272.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHerrnstein, R. J. ( 1970 ). On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243 – 266.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIglauer, C., & Woods, J. H. ( 1974 ). Concurrent performances: Reinforcement by different doses of intravenous cocaine in rhesus monkeys. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 179 – 196.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohanson, C. E., & Schuster, C. R. ( 1975 ). A choice procedure for drug reinforcers: Cocaine and methyl‐phenidate in the rhesus monkey. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 193, 676 – 688.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeller, J. V., & Gollub, L. R. ( 1977 ). Duration and rate of reinforcement as determinants of concurrent responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 28, 145 – 153.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLlewellyn, M. E., Iglauer, C., & Woods, J. H. ( 1976 ). Relative reinforcer magnitude under a nonindependent concurrent schedule of cocaine reinforcement in rhesus monkeys. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 25, 81 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceManzardo, A. M., Stein, L., & Belluzzi, J. D. ( 2002 ). Rats prefer cocaine over nicotine in a two‐lever self‐administration choice test. Brain Research, 924, 10 – 19.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcLean, A. P., & Blampied, N. M. ( 2001 ). Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: Independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 75, 25 – 42.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller, H. L. Jr. ( 1976 ). Matching‐based hedonic scaling in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 26, 335 – 347.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRachlin, H., Kagel, J. H., & Battalio, R. C. ( 1980 ). Substitutability in time allocation. Psychological Review, 87, 355 – 374.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTodorov, J. C., Hanna, E. S., & de Sá, M. C. N. Bittencourt ( 1984 ). Frequency versus magnitude of reinforcement: New data with a different procedure. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 157 – 167.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang, N. S., Brown, V. L., Grabowski, J., & Meisch, R. A. ( 2001 ). Reinforcement by orally delivered methadone, cocaine, and methadone‐cocaine combinations in rhesus monkeys: Are the combinations better reinforcers Psychopharmacology, 156, 63 – 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWade‐Galuska, T., Winger, G., & Woods, J. H. (in press). A behavioral economic analysis of cocaine and remifentanil self‐administration in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWoolverton, W. L. ( 1996 ). Intravenous self‐administration of cocaine under concurrent VI schedules of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology, 127, 195 – 203.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWoolverton, W. L., & Alling, K. ( 1999 ). Choice under concurrent VI schedules: Comparison of behavior maintained by cocaine or food. Psychopharmacology, 141, 47 – 56.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWoolverton, W. L., & Johanson, C. E. ( 1984 ). Preference in rhesus monkeys given a choice between cocaine and d, l ‐cathinone. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 35 – 43.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZar, J. H. ( 1999 ). Biostatistical analysis ( 4th ed. ). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, K. G., Velkey, A. J., & Woolverton, W. L. ( 2002 ). The generalized matching law as a predictor of choice between cocaine and food in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology, 163, 319 – 326.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, K. G., & Woolverton, W. L. ( 2000 ). Concurrent variable‐interval drug self‐administration and the generalized matching law: A drug class comparison. Behavioural Pharmacology, 11, 413 – 420.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaum, W. M. ( 1974 ). On two types of deviation from the matching law: Bias and undermatching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 231 – 242.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBergman, J., & Paronis, C. A. ( 2006 ). Measuring the reinforcing strength of abused drugs. Molecular Interventions, 6, 273 – 283.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCatania, A. C. ( 1963 ). Concurrent performances: A baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 299 – 300.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChelonis, J. J., & Logue, A. W. ( 1996 ). Effects of response type on pigeons' sensitivity to variation in reinforcer amount and reinforcer delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 66, 297 – 309.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jeab.2008.89-209.pdf
Size:
536.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.