Quantification Of Drug Choice With The Generalized Matching Law In Rhesus Monkeys
dc.contributor.author | Koffarnus, Mikhail N. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Woods, James H. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-03-05T18:18:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-03-05T18:18:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008-03 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Koffarnus, Mikhail N.; Woods, James H. (2008). "Quantification Of Drug Choice With The Generalized Matching Law In Rhesus Monkeys." Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 89(2). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96763> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0022-5002 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1938-3711 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96763 | |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Rhesus Monkeys | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Matching Law | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Self‐Administration | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Remifentanil | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Cocaine | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Methohexital | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Lever Press | en_US |
dc.title | Quantification Of Drug Choice With The Generalized Matching Law In Rhesus Monkeys | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Psychology | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 18422019 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/96763/1/jeab.2008.89-209.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1901/jeab.2008.89-209 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Motulsky, H. J., & Christopoulos, A. ( 2003 ). Fitting models to biological data using linear and nonlinear regression: A practical guide to curve fitting. San Diego, CA: GraphPad Software, Inc. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Davison, M. ( 1988 ). Concurrent schedules: Interaction of reinforcer frequency and reinforcer duration. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 339 – 349. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Davison, M., & Baum, W. M. ( 2003 ). Every reinforcer counts: Reinforcer magnitude and local preference. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 80, 95 – 129. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Davison, M., & Baum, W. M. ( 2006 ). Do conditional reinforcers count Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 86, 269 – 283. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Davison, M., & Hogsden, I. ( 1984 ). Concurrent variable‐interval schedule performance: Fixed versus mixed reinforcer durations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 169 – 182. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Galuska, C. M., Winger, G., Hursh, S. R., & Woods, J. H. ( 2006 ). Assessing unit‐price related remifentanil choice in rhesus monkeys. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 86, 181 – 195. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Herrnstein, R. J. ( 1961 ). Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 267 – 272. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Herrnstein, R. J. ( 1970 ). On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243 – 266. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Iglauer, C., & Woods, J. H. ( 1974 ). Concurrent performances: Reinforcement by different doses of intravenous cocaine in rhesus monkeys. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 179 – 196. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Johanson, C. E., & Schuster, C. R. ( 1975 ). A choice procedure for drug reinforcers: Cocaine and methyl‐phenidate in the rhesus monkey. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 193, 676 – 688. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Keller, J. V., & Gollub, L. R. ( 1977 ). Duration and rate of reinforcement as determinants of concurrent responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 28, 145 – 153. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Llewellyn, M. E., Iglauer, C., & Woods, J. H. ( 1976 ). Relative reinforcer magnitude under a nonindependent concurrent schedule of cocaine reinforcement in rhesus monkeys. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 25, 81 – 91. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Manzardo, A. M., Stein, L., & Belluzzi, J. D. ( 2002 ). Rats prefer cocaine over nicotine in a two‐lever self‐administration choice test. Brain Research, 924, 10 – 19. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | McLean, A. P., & Blampied, N. M. ( 2001 ). Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: Independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 75, 25 – 42. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Miller, H. L. Jr. ( 1976 ). Matching‐based hedonic scaling in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 26, 335 – 347. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rachlin, H., Kagel, J. H., & Battalio, R. C. ( 1980 ). Substitutability in time allocation. Psychological Review, 87, 355 – 374. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Todorov, J. C., Hanna, E. S., & de Sá, M. C. N. Bittencourt ( 1984 ). Frequency versus magnitude of reinforcement: New data with a different procedure. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 157 – 167. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wang, N. S., Brown, V. L., Grabowski, J., & Meisch, R. A. ( 2001 ). Reinforcement by orally delivered methadone, cocaine, and methadone‐cocaine combinations in rhesus monkeys: Are the combinations better reinforcers Psychopharmacology, 156, 63 – 72. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wade‐Galuska, T., Winger, G., & Woods, J. H. (in press). A behavioral economic analysis of cocaine and remifentanil self‐administration in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Woolverton, W. L. ( 1996 ). Intravenous self‐administration of cocaine under concurrent VI schedules of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology, 127, 195 – 203. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Woolverton, W. L., & Alling, K. ( 1999 ). Choice under concurrent VI schedules: Comparison of behavior maintained by cocaine or food. Psychopharmacology, 141, 47 – 56. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Woolverton, W. L., & Johanson, C. E. ( 1984 ). Preference in rhesus monkeys given a choice between cocaine and d, l ‐cathinone. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 35 – 43. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zar, J. H. ( 1999 ). Biostatistical analysis ( 4th ed. ). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Anderson, K. G., Velkey, A. J., & Woolverton, W. L. ( 2002 ). The generalized matching law as a predictor of choice between cocaine and food in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology, 163, 319 – 326. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Anderson, K. G., & Woolverton, W. L. ( 2000 ). Concurrent variable‐interval drug self‐administration and the generalized matching law: A drug class comparison. Behavioural Pharmacology, 11, 413 – 420. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Baum, W. M. ( 1974 ). On two types of deviation from the matching law: Bias and undermatching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 231 – 242. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bergman, J., & Paronis, C. A. ( 2006 ). Measuring the reinforcing strength of abused drugs. Molecular Interventions, 6, 273 – 283. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Catania, A. C. ( 1963 ). Concurrent performances: A baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 299 – 300. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Chelonis, J. J., & Logue, A. W. ( 1996 ). Effects of response type on pigeons' sensitivity to variation in reinforcer amount and reinforcer delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 66, 297 – 309. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.