Show simple item record

The state of psychosocial services in cancer care in the United States

dc.contributor.authorDeshields, Teresaen_US
dc.contributor.authorZebrack, Braden_US
dc.contributor.authorKennedy, Vickien_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-05T18:18:10Z
dc.date.available2014-05-01T14:28:15Zen_US
dc.date.issued2013-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationDeshields, Teresa; Zebrack, Brad; Kennedy, Vicki (2013). "The state of psychosocial services in cancer care in the United States." Psycho‐Oncology 22(3): 699-703. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96770>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1057-9249en_US
dc.identifier.issn1099-1611en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/96770
dc.description.abstractObjective In 2009, the APOS commissioned a survey of its members and attendees of the annual meetings in 2008 and 2009. The goal of the survey was to assess the scope of psychosocial support services for cancer patients in the USA. Methods Two hundred thirty‐three individuals (27% response rate) completed the survey, which included questions assessing the extent to which respondents' institutions provided informational and psychosocial support services and conducted screening for psychosocial distress. Results Respondents were primarily psychologists, although oncologists, nurses, social workers, and others were represented, as well. A broad array of informational and support services were endorsed as being provided to cancer patients, both at no charge or for a fee. Respondents identified social workers as the professionals most often providing psychosocial services to cancer patients. Respondents also indicated that most psychosocial services have not been tailored to fit a culturally diverse population. Furthermore, most of the organizations represented in the survey do not routinely screen cancer patients for psychosocial distress. Conclusions A broad range of psychosocial services are provided in cancer treatment settings; however, despite National Comprehensive Cancer Network and Institute of Medicine recommendations, routine screening for distress is not offered in a majority of cancer care organizations. Despite the racial, ethnic, cultural, and linguistic diversity of the US population, most organizations have not adapted their educational materials nor their psychosocial services to meet the needs of a diverse patient population. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltden_US
dc.subject.otherCanceren_US
dc.subject.otherSupport Servicesen_US
dc.subject.otherDiversityen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychosocial Servicesen_US
dc.subject.otherOncologyen_US
dc.titleThe state of psychosocial services in cancer care in the United Statesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid22354821en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/96770/1/pon3057.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pon.3057en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePsycho‐Oncologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Distress Management, v. 1, 2011. www.nccn.org [Accessed 14 March 2011].en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer. Cancer Program Standards 2012, v. 1.0. http://www.facs.org/cancer/index [Accessed 1 December 2011 ].en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInstitutes of Medicine. In Cancer Care for the Whole Patient: Meeting Psychosocial Health Needs, Adler NE, Page AEK (eds). The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInstitutes of Medicine & National Research Council. From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition. The National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 2006.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceColuzzi PH, Grant M, Doroshow JH et al. Survey of the provision of supportive care services at National Cancer Institute‐Designated cancer centers. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13 ( 3 ): 756 – 764.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolland JG. History of psycho‐oncology: Overcoming attitudinal and conceptual barriers. Psychosom Med 2002; 64: 206 – 221.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.