Show simple item record

The Willed Body Donor Interview project: Medical student and donor expectations

dc.contributor.authorBohl, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.authorHolman, Alexisen_US
dc.contributor.authorMueller, Dean A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGruppen, Larry D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHildebrandt, Sabineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-04-08T20:49:32Z
dc.date.available2014-05-01T14:28:22Zen_US
dc.date.issued2013-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationBohl, Michael; Holman, Alexis; Mueller, Dean A.; Gruppen, Larry D.; Hildebrandt, Sabine (2013). "The Willed Body Donor Interview project: Medical student and donor expectations." Anatomical Sciences Education 6(2): 90-100. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/97164>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1935-9772en_US
dc.identifier.issn1935-9780en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/97164
dc.description.abstractThe Anatomical Donations Program at the University of Michigan Medical School (UMMS) has begun a multiphase project wherein interviews of donors will be recorded and later shown to medical students who participate in the anatomical dissection course. The first phase of this project included surveys of both current UMMS medical students and donors concerning their perceptions of such a program. A five‐question survey administered via Qualtrics software was electronically mailed to all current medical students at UMMS, and a survey was mailed to registered and potential donors requesting information from the UMMS on anatomical donations. A total of 224 medical student responses (response rate 33%) and 54 donor responses (response rate 27%) were received. Seventy‐four percent of students and 81% of donors reported they would participate in this program if it existed. Students and donors supported the implementation of this program for varying reasons, though many felt strongly they would not want to participate in a donor interview program. These qualitative results support those of previous studies that show a majority of students desire a closer personal relationship with the donor, and these are the first results to be reported on donor perceptions of a donor interview program. Although many students and donors are in favor of instituting this program, others feel strongly that such an experience could be traumatic. The causes of these differing reactions need to be further explored, and the opinions of those who object to this study will be respected by maintaining voluntary participation in future phases of this study. Anat Sci Educ 6: 90–100. © 2012 American Association of Anatomists.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherEmpathyen_US
dc.subject.otherAnatomical Dissectionen_US
dc.subject.otherGross Anatomy Educationen_US
dc.subject.otherBody Donorsen_US
dc.subject.otherAnatomical Bequest Programen_US
dc.subject.otherWilled Body Programen_US
dc.subject.otherClinical Detachmenten_US
dc.subject.otherPerception of Anatomical Dissection Courseen_US
dc.titleThe Willed Body Donor Interview project: Medical student and donor expectationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Medical Education, Division of Anatomical Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, 3767 Medical Science Building II, Catherine Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109‐0608, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Medical Education, Division of Anatomical Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Medical Education, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.identifier.pmid23109299en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/97164/1/1326_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ase.1326en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAnatomical Sciences Educationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBertman SL, Marks SC Jr. 1985. Humanities in medical education: rationale and resources for the dissection laboratory. Med Educ 19: 374 – 381.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBergman EM, Prince KJ, Drukker J, van der Vleuten CP, Scherpbier AJ. 2008. How much anatomy is enough? Anat Sci Educ 1: 184 – 188.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWear D. 1989. Cadaver talk: Medical students' accounts of their year‐long experience. Death Studies 13: 379 – 391.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVannatta JB, Crow SM. 2007. Enhancing humanism through gross anatomy: Apre‐course intervention. Med Educ 41: 1108.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrotman P (Director/producer). 2009. Donated to Science (DVD). Dunedin, New Zealand: Paul Trotman Films. 80 min.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTalarico EF Jr, Prather AD. 2007. A piece of my mind. Connecting the dots to make a difference. JAMA 298: 381 – 382.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRizzolo LJ. 2002. Human dissection: An approach to interweaving the traditional and humanistic goals of medical education. Anat Rec 269: 242 – 248.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQuilligan K. 2010. IUN teaches compassion, respect for patients. Nwi.com 29 August 2010. The Times Media Co, Munster, IN. URL: http://www.nwitimes. com/news/special‐section/heath‐innovation/article_08f2bea7‐96dc‐583f‐a483‐59f8f21bbd76.html [accessed 20 July 2012].en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePenney JC. 1985. Reactions of medical students to dissection. J Med Educ 60: 58 – 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMadill A, Latchford G. 2005. Identity change and the human dissection experience over the first year of medical training. Soc Sci Med 60: 1637 – 1647.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLamdin R, Weller J, Kerse N. 2012. Orientation to dissection: Assisting students through the transition. Clin Anat 25: 235 – 240.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHorne DJ, Tiller JW, Eizenberg N, Tashevska M, Biddle N. 1990. Reactions of first‐year medical students to their initial encounter with a cadaver in the dissecting room. Acad Med 65: 645 – 646.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHopkins R. 2012. Teaching and learning moments: A negotiation between death and learning. Acad Med 87: 331.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHafferty FW. 1991. Into the Valley: Death and the Socialization of Medical Students. 1st Ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. 288 p.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDruce M, Johnson MH. 1994. Human dissection and attitudes of preclinical students to death and bereavement. Clin Anat 7: 42 – 49.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrow SM, O'Donoghue D, Vannatta JB, Thompson BM. 2012. Meeting the family: Promoting humanism in gross anatomy. Teach Learn Med 24: 49 – 54.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeeks SE, Harris EE, Kinzey WG. 1995. Human gross anatomy: A crucial time to encourage respect and compassion in students. Clin Anat 8: 69 – 79.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoulehan JL, Williams PC, Landis D, Naser C. 1995. The first patient: Reflections and stories about the anatomy cadaver. Teach Learn Med 7: 61 – 66.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBohl M, Bosch P, Hildebrandt S. 2011. Medical students' perceptions of the body donor as a “first patient” or “teacher”: A pilot study. Anat Sci Educ 4: 208 – 213.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.