Show simple item record

Patient‐reported outcomes after 3‐dimensional conformal, intensity‐modulated, or proton beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer

dc.contributor.authorGray, Phillip J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPaly, Jonathan J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorYeap, Beow Y.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSanda, Martin G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSandler, Howard. M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMichalski, Jeff M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTalcott, James A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCoen, John J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHamstra, Daniel A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorShipley, William U.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHahn, Stephen M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZietman, Anthony L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBekelman, Justin E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEfstathiou, Jason A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-02T19:35:08Z
dc.date.available2014-07-01T15:53:31Zen_US
dc.date.issued2013-05-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationGray, Phillip J.; Paly, Jonathan J.; Yeap, Beow Y.; Sanda, Martin G.; Sandler, Howard. M.; Michalski, Jeff M.; Talcott, James A.; Coen, John J.; Hamstra, Daniel A.; Shipley, William U.; Hahn, Stephen M.; Zietman, Anthony L.; Bekelman, Justin E.; Efstathiou, Jason A. (2013). "Patient‐reported outcomes after 3‐dimensional conformal, intensity‐modulated, or proton beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer ." Cancer 119(9): 1729-1735. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/97476>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0008-543Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/97476
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested differing toxicity patterns for patients with prostate cancer who receive treatment with 3‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), or proton beam therapy (PBT). METHODS: The authors reviewed patient‐reported outcomes data collected prospectively using validated instruments that assessed bowel and urinary quality of life (QOL) for patients with localized prostate cancer who received 3DCRT (n = 123), IMRT (n = 153) or PBT (n = 95). Clinically meaningful differences in mean QOL scores were defined as those exceeding half the standard deviation of the baseline mean value. Changes from baseline were compared within groups at the first post‐treatment follow‐up (2‐3 months from the start of treatment) and at 12 months and 24 months. RESULTS: At the first post‐treatment follow‐up, patients who received 3DCRT and IMRT, but not those who received PBT, reported a clinically meaningful decrement in bowel QOL. At 12 months and 24 months, all 3 cohorts reported clinically meaningful decrements in bowel QOL. Patients who received IMRT reported clinically meaningful decrements in the domains of urinary irritation/obstruction and incontinence at the first post‐treatment follow‐up. At 12 months, patients who received PBT, but not those who received IMRT or 3DCRT, reported a clinically meaningful decrement in the urinary irritation/obstruction domain. At 24 months, none of the 3 cohorts reported clinically meaningful changes in urinary QOL. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received 3DCRT, IMRT, or PBT reported distinct patterns of treatment‐related QOL. Although the timing of toxicity varied between the cohorts, patients reported similar modest QOL decrements in the bowel domain and minimal QOL decrements in the urinary domains at 24 months. Prospective randomized trials are needed to further examine these differences. Cancer 2013. © 2013 American Cancer Society. Prostate cancer patients who receive 3‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity‐modulated radiotherapy, or proton beam therapy report distinct patterns of treatment‐related quality of life. Although the timing of toxicity varies between cohorts, patients report similar modest quality‐of‐life decrements in the bowel domain and minimal QOL decrements in the urinary domains at 24 months.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherQuality of Lifeen_US
dc.subject.other3‐Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapyen_US
dc.subject.otherIntensity‐Modulated Radiotherapyen_US
dc.subject.otherPatient Reported Outcomesen_US
dc.subject.otherProstate Canceren_US
dc.subject.otherProton Therapyen_US
dc.titlePatient‐reported outcomes after 3‐dimensional conformal, intensity‐modulated, or proton beam radiotherapy for localized prostate canceren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHarvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, Massachusettsen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Urologic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusettsen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 100 Blossom Street, Cox 3, Boston, MA 02114en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvaniaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHartford Radiation Oncology Associates, Hartford, Connecticuten_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherContinuum Cancer Care Consortium, New York, New Yorken_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missourien_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, Californiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusettsen_US
dc.identifier.pmid23436283en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/97476/1/27956_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.27956en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCanceren_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMichalski JM, Gay H, Jackson A, Tucker SL, Deasy JO. Radiation dose‐volume effects in radiation‐induced rectal injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 76 ( 3 suppl ): S123 – S129.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoen JJ, Bae K, Zietman AL, et al. Acute and late toxicity after dose escalation to 82 GyE using conformal proton radiation for localized prostate cancer: initial report of American College of Radiology phase II study 03‐12. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 81: 1005 – 1009.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBekelman JE, Mitra N, Efstathiou J, et al. Outcomes after intensity‐modulated versus conformal radiotherapy in older men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 81: e325 – e334.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDinan MA, Robinson TJ, Zagar TM, et al. Changes in initial treatment for prostate cancer among Medicare beneficiaries, 1999‐2007. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 82: e781 – e786.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNguyen PL, Gu X, Lipsitz SR, et al. Cost implications of the rapid adoption of newer technologies for treating prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29: 1517 – 1524.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEfstathiou JA, Trofimov AV, Zietman AL. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of protons: an evidence‐based review of the role of particle therapy in the treatment of prostate cancer. Cancer J. 2009; 15: 312 – 318.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim S, Shen S, Moore DF, et al. Late gastrointestinal toxicities following radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2011; 60: 908 – 916.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKonski A, Speier W, Hanlon A, Beck JR, Pollack A. Is proton beam therapy cost effective in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the prostate? J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 3603 – 3608.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSheets NC, Goldin GH, Meyer AM, et al. Intensity‐modulated radiation therapy, proton therapy, or conformal radiation therapy and morbidity and disease control in localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 2012; 307: 1611 – 1620.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLodge M, Pijls‐Johannesma M, Stirk L, Munro AJ, De Ruysscher D, Jefferson T. A systematic literature review of the clinical and cost‐effectiveness of hadron therapy in cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2007; 83: 110 – 122.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoya del Pina B. Proton therapy for cancer: a new technology brief. Available at: http://www.cancer.gov/aboutnci/ncicancerbulletin/archive/2009/090809/page8. [Accessed November 1, 2012 ].en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilt TJ, MacDonald R, Rutks I, Shamliyan TA, Taylor BC, Kane RL. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and harms of treatments for clinically localized prostate cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2008; 148: 435 – 448.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClark JA, Talcott JA. Symptom indexes to assess outcomes of treatment for early prostate cancer. Med Care. 2001; 39: 1118 – 1130.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWei JT, Dunn RL, Litwin MS, Sandler HM, Sanda MG. Development and validation of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health‐related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Urology. 2000; 56: 899 – 905.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoen JJ, Paly JJ, Niemierko A, et al. Long‐term quality of life outcome after proton beam monotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 82: e201 – e209.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate‐cancer survivors. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 1250 – 1261.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTalcott JA, Manola J, Clark JA, et al. Time course and predictors of symptoms after primary prostate cancer therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21: 3979 – 3986.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health‐related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003; 41: 582 – 592.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlicikus ZA, Yamada Y, Zhang Z, et al. Ten‐year outcomes of high‐dose, intensity‐modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Cancer. 2011; 117: 1429 – 1437.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerrer M, Suarez JF, Guedea F, et al. Health‐related quality of life 2 years after treatment with radical prostatectomy, prostate brachytherapy, or external beam radiotherapy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 72: 421 – 432.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoppe BS, Nichols RC, Henderson RH, et al. Erectile function, incontinence, and other quality of life outcomes following proton therapy for prostate cancer in men 60 years old and younger. Cancer. 2012; 118: 4619 – 4626.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePederson AW, Fricano J, Correa D, Pelizzari CA, Liauw SL. Late toxicity after intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: an exploration of dose‐volume histogram parameters to limit genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 82: 235 – 241.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePinkawa M, Piroth MD, Fischedick K, et al. Self‐assessed bowel toxicity after external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer—predictive factors on irritative symptoms, incontinence and rectal bleeding [serial online]. Radiat Oncol. 2009; 4: 36.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSandler HM, Liu PY, Dunn RL, Khan DC, Tropper SE, Sanda MG, et al. Reduction in patient‐reported acute morbidity in prostate cancer patients treated with 81‐Gy intensity‐modulated radiotherapy using reduced planning target volume margins and electromagnetic tracking: assessing the impact of margin reduction study. Urology. 2010; 75: 1004 – 1008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMichalski JM, Yan Y, Watkins‐Bruner D, et al. Preliminary analysis of 3D‐CRT vs IMRT on the high dose arm of the RTOG 0126 Prostate Cancer Trial: toxicity report. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 81: S1 – S2.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWatkins Bruner D, Hunt D, et al. Preliminary analysis of 3D‐CRT vs IMRT on the High Dose Arm of the RTOG 0126 Prostate Cancer Trial: patient reported outcomes. J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 81: S44 – S44.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarks LB, Yorke ED, Jackson A, et al. Use of normal tissue complication probability models in the clinic. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 76 ( 3 suppl ): S10 – S19.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrofimov A, Nguyen PL, Coen JJ, et al. Radiotherapy treatment of early stage prostate cancer with IMRT and protons: a treatment planning comparison. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 69: 444 – 453.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwarz M, Pierelli A, Fiorino C, et al. Helical tomotherapy and intensity modulated proton therapy in the treatment of early stage prostate cancer: a treatment planning comparison. Radiother Oncol. 2011; 98: 74 – 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDias RS, Giordani AJ, Souhami L, Segreto RA, Segreto HR. Rectal planning risk volume correlation with acute and late toxicity in 3‐dimensional conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2011; 10: 585 – 590.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValdagni R, Rancati T, Fiorino C, et al. Development of a set of nomograms to predict acute lower gastrointestinal toxicity for prostate cancer 3D‐CRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 71: 1065 – 1073.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVavassori V, Fiorino C, Rancati T, et al. Predictors for rectal and intestinal acute toxicities during prostate cancer high‐dose 3D‐CRT: results of a prospective multicenter study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 67: 1401 – 1410.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRancati T, Fiorino C, Fellin G, et al. Inclusion of clinical risk factors into NTCP modelling of late rectal toxicity after high dose radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2011; 100: 124 – 130.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSkwarchuk MW, Jackson A, Zelefsky MJ, et al. Late rectal toxicity after conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer (I): multivariate analysis and dose‐response. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000; 47: 103 – 113.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarlsdottir A, Muren LP, Wentzel‐Larsen T, Dahl O. Late gastrointestinal morbidity after 3‐dimensional conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer fades with time in contrast to genitourinary morbidity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 70: 1478 – 1486.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJackson A, Skwarchuk MW, Zelefsky MJ, et al. Late rectal bleeding after conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer. II. Volume effects and dose‐volume histograms. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001; 49: 685 – 698.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNguyen PL, Chen RC, Hoffman KE, et al. Rectal dose‐volume histogram parameters are associated with long‐term patient‐reported gastrointestinal quality of life after conventional and high‐dose radiation for prostate cancer: a subgroup analysis of a randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 78: 1081 – 1085.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTucker SL, Dong L, Michalski JM, et al. Do intermediate radiation doses contribute to late rectal toxicity? An analysis of data from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 94‐06. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 84: 390 – 395.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFiorino C, Fellin G, Rancati T, Vavassori V, Bianchi C, Borca VC, et al. Clinical and dosimetric predictors of late rectal syndrome after 3D‐CRT for localized prostate cancer: preliminary results of a multicenter prospective study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 70: 1130 – 1137.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYu JB, Soulos PR, Herrin J, Cramer LD, Potosky AL, Roberts KB, et al. Proton versus intensity‐modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: patterns of care and early toxicity. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013; 105: 25 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePotosky AL, Warren JL, Riedel ER, Klabunde CN, Earle CC, Begg CB. Measuring complications of cancer treatment using the SEER‐Medicare data. Med Care. 2002; 40 ( 8 suppl ): IV‐62 – IV‐68.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuanza TM, Albert PS, Smith S, et al. Comparing measures of acute bowel toxicity in patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005; 62: 1316 – 1321.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHovdenak N, Karlsdottir A, Sorbye H, Dahl O. Profiles and time course of acute radiation toxicity symptoms during conformal radiotherapy for cancer of the prostate. Acta Oncol. 2003; 42: 741 – 748.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShah A, Efstathiou JA, Paly JJ, et al. Prospective preference assessment of patients' willingness to participate in a randomized controlled trial of intensity‐modulated radiotherapy versus proton therapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 83: e19 – e19.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZietman AL, Bae K, Slater JD, et al. Randomized trial comparing conventional‐dose with high‐dose conformal radiation therapy in early stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate: long‐term results from Proton Radiation Oncology Group/American College of Radiology 95‐09. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 1106 – 1111.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.