Show simple item record

The Clinical Utility of Health‐related Quality of Life Assessment in Pediatric Cardiology Outpatient Practice

dc.contributor.authorUzark, Karenen_US
dc.contributor.authorKing, Eileenen_US
dc.contributor.authorSpicer, Roberten_US
dc.contributor.authorBeekman, Roberten_US
dc.contributor.authorKimball, Thomasen_US
dc.contributor.authorVarni, James W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-18T18:31:58Z
dc.date.available2014-07-01T15:53:15Zen_US
dc.date.issued2013-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationUzark, Karen; King, Eileen; Spicer, Robert; Beekman, Robert; Kimball, Thomas; Varni, James W. (2013). "The Clinical Utility of Health‐related Quality of Life Assessment in Pediatric Cardiology Outpatient Practice." Congenital Heart Disease (3): 211-218. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/98109>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1747-079Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1747-0803en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/98109
dc.description.abstractObjectives Children with congenital heart disease may experience significant psychosocial morbidity related to impaired quality of life ( QOL ). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of health‐related QOL assessment in a pediatric cardiology outpatient clinic. Design The P ediatric Q uality of L ife I nventory ( PedsQL ) 4.0 G eneric C ore S cales were completed by a convenience sample of 176 patients, aged 8–18 years, being seen in a pediatric cardiology clinic. Three cardiologists enrolled in this study reviewed the completed PedsQL during the clinic visit and recorded their responses to items reported to be a problem “Often” or “Almost Always.” This utilization of the instrument was compared to standardized scoring and the practicality and perceived usefulness of the practice was evaluated by physician interview. Results PedsQL responses showed 38% of patients reporting significant (Often or Almost Always) problems on at least one domain (19% P hysical F unctioning, 18.2% E motional F unctioning, 11.4% S ocial F unctioning, and 22.3% S chool F unctioning problems). Using standardized scoring, the prevalence of scores below the cutoff score for clinically significant impaired QOL in each domain ranged from 10% to 20%, with agreement between scoring methods ranging from 89% to 93%, sensitivity 68% to 86%, and specificity 89% to 97%. Cardiologists reported interventions in 30.1% of patients. They found that the PedsQL was easy to use, did not interfere with clinic operations, required minimal time (1–5 minutes), and provided information that had an important impact on their practice in some patients. Conclusions This study demonstrates the clinical utility of health‐related QOL assessment using the PedsQL in a pediatric cardiology outpatient setting. Identification of significant impairments in QOL can impact clinical decision making and may change psychosocial outcomes in children with congenital heart disease.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherPatient‐Reported Outcomesen_US
dc.subject.otherChildrenen_US
dc.subject.otherPediatric Cardiologyen_US
dc.subject.otherPedsQLen_US
dc.subject.otherQuality of Lifeen_US
dc.titleThe Clinical Utility of Health‐related Quality of Life Assessment in Pediatric Cardiology Outpatient Practiceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid22967147en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/98109/1/chd12002.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/chd.12002en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCongenital Heart Diseaseen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClarke SA, Eiser C. The measurement of health‐related quality of life (QOL) in paediatric clinical trials: a systematic review. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004; 2: 66 – 70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVarni JW, Limbers CA, Burwinkle TM. Impaired health‐related quality of life in children and adolescents with chronic conditions: a comparative analysis of 10 disease clusters and 33 disease categories/severities utilizing the PedsQL™ 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007; 5: 1 – 15.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeWit M, De Waal D, Bokma JA, et al. Monitoring and discussing health‐related quality of life in adolescents with type1 diabetes improve psychosocial well‐being. Diabetes Care. 2008; 31: 1521 – 1526.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeid M, Varni JW, Segall D, Kurtin PS. Health‐related quality of life as a predictor of pediatric healthcare costs: a two‐year prospective cohort analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004; 2: 48 – 57.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWasson J, Keller A, Rubenstein L, et al. Benefits and obstacles of health status assessment in ambulatory settings. Med Care. 1992; 30: MS42 – MS49.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGutteling JJ, Busschbach JJV, de Man RA, Darlington ASE. Logistic feasibility of health related quality of life measurement in clinical practice: results of a prospective study in a large population of chronic liver patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008; 6: 97 – 105.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGilbody SM, House AO, Sheldon T. Routine administration of health related quality of life (HRQoL) and needs assessment instruments to improve psychological outcomes—a systematic review. Psychol Med. 2002; 32: 1345 – 1356.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmart A. A multi‐dimensional model of clinical utility. Int J Qual Health Care. 2006; 18: 377 – 382.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVarni JW, Seid M, Knight TS, Uzark K, Szer IS. The PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales: sensitivity, responsiveness, and impact on clinical decision‐making. J Behav Med. 2002; 25: 175 – 193.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVarni JW, Burwinkle TM, Seid M, Skarr D. The PedsQL 4.0 as a pediatric population health measure: feasibility, reliability, and validity. Ambul Pediatr. 2003; 3: 329 – 341.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVarni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. Peds QL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 Generic Core Scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. 2001; 39: 800 – 812.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCostello EJ, Edelbrock C, Costello AJ, Dulcan MK, Burns BJ, Brent D. Psychopathology in pediatric primary care: the new hidden morbidity. Pediatrics. 1988; 82: 415 – 424.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCrindle BW, Williams RV, Mitchell PD, et al. Relationship of patient and medical characteristics to health status in children and adolescents after the Fontan procedure. Circulation. 2006; 113: 1123 – 1129.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUzark K, Jones K, Slusher J, Limbers C, Burwinkle TM, Varni JW. Quality of life in children with heart disease as perceived by children and parents. Pediatrics. 2008; 121: e1060 – e1067.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGutteling JJ, Darlington ASE, Janssen HLA, Duivenvoorden HJ, Busschbach JJV, de Man RA. Effectiveness of health‐related quality of life measurement in clinical practice: a prospective, randomized controlled trial in patients with chronic liver disease and their physicians. Qual Life Res. 2008; 17: 195 – 205.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVarni JW, Burwinkle TM, Lane MM. Health‐related quality of life measurement in pediatric clinical practice: an appraisal and precept for future research and application. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005; 3: 34 – 43.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVarni JW, Handen BL, Corey‐Lisle PK, et al. Effect of Aripiprazole 2 to 15 mg/d on health‐related quality of life in the treatment of irritability associated with Autistic Disorder in children: a post hoc analysis of two controlled trials. Clin Ther. 2012; 34: 980 – 992.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.