View Item 

Show simple item record

Skeletal evidence for variable patterns of handedness in chimpanzees, human hunter–gatherers, and recent British populations
dc.contributor.authorStock, Jay T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorShirley, Meghan K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSarringhaus, Lauren A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDavies, Tom G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorShaw, Colin N.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-18T18:32:53Z
dc.date.available2014-08-01T19:11:33Zen_US
dc.date.issued2013-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationStock, Jay T.; Shirley, Meghan K.; Sarringhaus, Lauren A.; Davies, Tom G.; Shaw, Colin N. (2013). "Skeletal evidence for variable patterns of handedness in chimpanzees, human hunter–gatherers, and recent British populations." Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1288(1): 86-99. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/98285>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0077-8923en_US
dc.identifier.issn1749-6632en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/98285
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherLawrence Erlbaum Associates, Ltden_US
dc.subject.otherLateralityen_US
dc.subject.otherTechnologyen_US
dc.subject.otherForagersen_US
dc.titleSkeletal evidence for variable patterns of handedness in chimpanzees, human hunter–gatherers, and recent British populationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelScience (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid23627693en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/98285/1/nyas12067.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nyas.12067en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLieberman, D.E., M.J. Devlin & O.M. Pearson. 2001. Articular area responses to mechanical loading: effects of exercise, age and skeletal location. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 116: 266 – 277.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcGrew, W.C. & L.F. Marchant. 1997. On the other hand: current issues in and meta‐analysis of the behavioral laterality of limb function in nonhuman primates. Yrbk. Phys. Anthropol. 40: 201 – 232.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUomini, N.T. 2009. The prehistory of handedness: archaeological data and comparative ethology. J. Hum. Evol. 57: 411 – 419.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinch, G. 1941. Chimpanzee handedness. Science 94: 117 – 188.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoesch, C. 1991. Handedness in wild chimpanzees. Int. J. Primatol. 12: 541 – 558.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcGrew, W.C. & L.F. Marchant. 1999. Laterality of hand use pays off in foraging success for wild chimpanzees. Primates 40: 509 – 513.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceByrne, R.W., N. Corp & J.M.E. Byrne. 2001. Manual dexterity in the gorilla: bimanual and digit role differentiation in a natural task. Anim. Cogn. 4: 347 – 361.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFagot, J. & J. Vauclair. 1991. Manual laterality in non‐human primates: a distinction between handedness and manual specialization. Psychol. Bull. 109: 76 – 89.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTonooka, R. & T. Matsuzawa. 1995. Hand preference of captive chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes ) in simple reaching for food. Int. J. Primatol. 16: 17 – 35.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFletcher, A.W. & J.A. Weghorst. 2005. Laterality of hand function in naturalistically housed chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes ). Laterality 10: 219 – 242.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHopkins, W.D. 2006. Comparative and familial analysis of handedness in great apes. Psychol. Bull. 132: 538 – 559.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMosquera, M. et al. 2007. Ethological study of manual laterality in naturalistic housed chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes ) from the Mona Foundation Sanctuary (Girona, Spain). Laterality 12: 19 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLlorente, M. et al. 2011. Population‐level right‐handedness for a coordinated bimanual task in naturalistic housed chimpanzees: replication and extension in 114 animals from Zambia and Spain. Am. J. Primatol. 73: 281 – 290.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHopkins, W.D. et al. 2011. Hand preferences for coordinated bimanual actions in 777 great apes: implications for the evolution of handedness in hominins. J. Hum. Evol. 60: 605 – 611.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHopkins, W.D. & R.D. Morris. 1993. Handedness in great apes: a review of findings. Int. J. Primatol. 14: 1 – 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChapelain, A.S., E. Hogervorst, P. Mbonzo & W.D. Hopkins. 2011. Hand preferences for bimanual coordination in 77 bonobos ( Pan paniscus ): Replication and extension. Int. J. Primatol. 32: 491 – 510.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArcadi, A.C. & W. Wallauer. 2011. Individual‐level lateralization in the asymmetrical gaits of wild chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes ): implications for hand preference and skeletal asymmetry? Behavior 148: 1419 – 1441.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWestergaard, G.C., H.E. Kuhn & S.J. Suomi. 1998. Laterality of hand function in tufted capuchin monkeys ( Cebus apella ): comparison between tool use actions and spontaneous non‐tool actions. Ethology 104: 119 – 125.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHumle, T. & T. Matsuzawa. 2009. Laterality in hand use across four tool‐use behaviors among the wild chimpanzees of Bossou, Guinea, West Africa. Am. J. Primatol. 71: 40 – 48.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHopkins, W.D., M.J. Wesley, M.K. Izard, et al. 2004. Chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes ) are predominantly right‐handed: replication in three populations of apes. Behav. Neurosci. 118: 659 – 663.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePalmer, A.R. 2003. Reply to Hopkins and Cantalupo: Chimpanzee right‐handedness reconsidered—sampling issues and data presentation. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 121: 382 – 384.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAuerbach, B.M. & C.B. Ruff. 2006. Limb bone bilateral asymmetry: variability and commonality among modern humans. J. Hum. Evol. 50: 203 – 218.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcGrew, W.C. & L.F. Marchant. 2001. Ethological study of manual laterality in the chimpanzees of the Mahale Mountains, Tanzania. Behavior 138: 329 – 358.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSarringhaus, L.A., J.T. Stock, L.F. Marchant & W.C. McGrew. 2005. Bilateral asymmetry in the limb bones of the chimpanzee ( Pan troglodytes ). Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 128: 840 – 845.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBraccini, S., S. Lambeth, S. Schapiro & W.T. Fitch. 2010. Bipedal tool use strengthens chimpanzee hand preferences. J. Hum. Evol. 58: 234 – 241.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRuff, C.B., B. Holt & E. Trinkaus. 2006. Who's afraid of the big bad Wolff? “Wolff's law” and bone functional adaptation. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 129: 484 – 498.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShaw, C.N. & J.T. Stock. 2009a. Intensity, repetitiveness and directionality of habitual adolescent mobility patterns influence the tibial diaphysis morphology in athletes. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 140: 149 – 159.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShaw, C.N. & J.T. Stock. 2009b. Habitual throwing and swimming correspond with upper limb diaphyseal strength and shape in modern human athletes. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 140: 160 – 172.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLlaurens, V., M. Raymond & C. Faurie. 2009. Why are some people left‐handed? An evolutionary perspective. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 364: 881 – 894.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorballis, M.C. 1997. The genetics and evolution of handedness. Psychol. Rev. 104: 714 – 727.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchaafsma, S.M. et al. 2012. Handedness in a nonindustrial society challenges the fighting hypothesis as an evolutionary explanation for left‐handedness. Evol. Hum. Behav. 33: 94 – 99.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnnett, M. 1985. Left, Right, Hand and Brain: The Right Shift Theory. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcManus, I.C. 1985. Right and left hand skill: failure of the right shift model. Br. J. Psychol. 76: 1 – 16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDenny, K. & V. O'Sullivan. 2007. The economic consequences of being left‐handed: some sinister results. J. Hum. Resource 42: 353 – 374.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorballis, M.C. 2009. The evolution and genetics of cerebral asymmetry. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 364: 867 – 879.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeters, M. 1990. Phenotype in normal left‐handers: an understanding of phenotype is the basis for understanding mechanism and inheritance of handedness. In Left‐Handedness: Behavioral Implications and Anomalies. 167 – 192. Amsterdam: Elsevier.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteele, J. 2000. Handedness in past human populations: skeletal markers. Laterality 5: 193 – 220.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcManus, I.C. 2009. The history and geography of human handedness. In Language Lateralization and Psychosis. 37 – 57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcManus, I.C. 2002. Right Hand, Left Hand: The Origins of Asymmetry in Brains, Bodies, Atoms and Cultures. London, UK/Cambridge, MA: Weidenfeld and Nicholson/Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcManus, I.C. & A. Hartigan. 2007. Declining left‐handedness in Victorian England seen in the films of Mitchell and Kenyon. Curr. Biol. 17: R793 – R794.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFalk, D. 1987. Brain lateralization in primates and its evolution in hominids. Yrbk. Phys. Anthropol. 30: 107 – 125.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarris, L.J. 1990. Cultural influences on handedness: historical and contemporary evidence. In Left‐Handedness: Behavioral Implications and Anomalies. 195 – 208. Amsterdam: Elsevier.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLazenby, R.A. 2002. Skeletal biology, functional asymmetry and the origins of ‘handedness ’. J. Theor. Biol. 218: 129 – 138.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmits, R. 2010. The Puzzle of Left‐Handedness. London: Reaktion Books Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGilbert, A.V. & C.J. Wysocki. 1992. Hand preference and age in the United States. Neuropsychologia 30: 601 – 608.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrackenridge, C.J. 1981. Secular variation in handedness over ninety years. Neuropsychologia 19: 459 – 462.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcManus, I.C. 1991. “ The inheritance of left‐handedness.” In Biological Asymmetry and Handedness, Ciba Foundation Symposium 162. 251 – 267. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSingh, M., M. Manjary & G. Dellatolas. 2001. Lateral preferences among Indian schoolchildren. Cortex 37: 231 – 241.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerelle, I.B. & L. Ehrman. 1994. An international study of human handedness: the data. Behav. Genet. 24: 217 – 227.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMandal, M.K., Y. Ida, S. Harizuka & N. Upadhaya. 1999. Cultural difference in hand preference: evidence from India and Japan. Int. J. Psych. 34: 59 – 66.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFaurie, C. & M. Raymond. 2005a. Handedness, homicide and negative frequency‐dependent selection. Proc. R. Soc. B. 272: 25 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFaurie, C., W. Schiefenhovel, S. Le Bomin, S. Billiard & M. Raymond. 2005b. Variation in the frequency of left‐handedness in traditional societies. Curr. Anthropol. 46: 142 – 147.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeuze, R.H. et al. 2012. Plasticity of lateralization: schooling predicts hand preference but not hand skill asymmetry in a non‐industrial society. Neuropsychologia 50: 612 – 620.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBryden, M.P., A. Ardila & O. Ardila. 1993. Handedness in native Amazonians. Neuropsychologia 31: 301 – 308.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArdila A. et al. 1989. Effects of cultural background and education on handedness. Neuropsychologia 27: 893 – 897.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaland, K.N., J. Kumm, J.D. Van Horn & M.W. Feldman. 1991. A gene‐culture model of human handedness. Behav. Genet. 25: 433 – 445.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchaafsma, S.M., B.J. Riedstra, K.A. Pfannkuche, A. Bouma & T.G.G. Groothuis. 2009. Epigenesis of behavioral lateralization in humans and other animals. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 364: 915 – 927.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuck, L.T., J.T. Stock & R.A. Foley. 2010. Levels of intraspecific variation within the catarrhine skeleton. Int. J. Primatol. 31: 779 – 795.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRuff, C.B. 2008. “ Biomechanical analyses of archaeological human skeletons.” In Biological Anthropology of the Human Skeleton. 183 – 206. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStock, J.T. & S. Pfeiffer. 2001. Linking structural variability to habitual behaviors: foragers from the southern African Later Stone Age and the Andaman Islands. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 115: 337 – 348.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStock, J.T. & S.K. Pfeiffer. 2004. Long bone robusticity and subsistence behavior among Later Stone Age foragers of the forest and fynbos biomes of South Africa. J. Archaeol. Sci. 31: 999 – 1013.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolt, B.M. 2003. Mobility in Upper Palaeolithic and Mesolithic Europe: evidence from the lower limb. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 122: 200 – 215.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLieberman, D.E., O.M. Pearson, J.D. Polk, B. Demes & A.W. Crompton. 2003. Optimization of bone growth and remodeling in response to loading in tapered mammalian limbs. J. Exper. Biol. 206: 3125 – 3138.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRuff, C.B. 2005. Mechanical determinants of bone form: insights from skeletal remains. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal. Interact. 5: 202 – 212.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarlson, K.J. 2005. Investigating the form‐function interface in African apes: relationships between principal moments of area and positional behaviors in femoral and humeral diaphyses. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 127: 312 – 334.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStock, J.T. 2006. Hunter‐gatherer postcranial robusticity relative to patterns of mobility, climatic adaptation and selection for tissue economy. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 131: 194 – 204.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStock, J.T. & C.N. Shaw. 2007. Which measures of diaphyseal robusticity are robust? A comparison of external methods of quantifying the strength of long bone diaphyses to cross‐sectional geometric properties. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 134: 412 – 423.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaggiano, I.S. et al. 2008. Cross‐sectional analysis of long bones, occupational activities and long‐distance trade of the Classic Maya from Xcambó—archaeological and osteological evidence. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 136: 470 – 477.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSparacello V.S. & O.M. Pearson. 2010. The importance of accounting for the area of the medullary cavity in cross‐sectional geometry: a test based on the femoral midshaft. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 143: 612 – 624.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBiewener, A.A. & J.E.A. Bertram. 1994. Structural response of growing bone to exercise and disuse. J. Appl. Physiol. 76: 946 – 955.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrinkaus, E., S.E. Churchill & C.B. Ruff. 1994. Postcranial robusticity in Homo. II: humeral bilateral asymmetry and bone plasticity. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 93: 1 – 34.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChurchill, S.E. & V. Formicola. 1997. A case of marked bilateral asymmetry in the upper limbs of an Upper Palaeolithic male from Barma Grande (Liguria), Italy. Int. J. Osteoarchaeol. 7: 18 – 38.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurr, D.B., A.G. Robling & C.H. Turner. 2002. Effects of biomechanical stress on bones in animals. Bone 30: 781 – 786.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShaw, C.N. 2011. Is “hand preference” coded in the hominin skeleton? An in‐vivo study of bilateral morphological variation. J. Hum. Evol. 61: 480 – 487.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones, H.H., J.D. Priest, W.C. Hayes, et al. 1977. Humeral hypertrophy in response to exercise. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 59: 204 – 208.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRuff, C.B. & J.A. Runestad. 1992. Primate limb bone structural adaptations. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 21: 407 – 433.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnüsel, C.J. 2000. Bone adaptation and its relationship to physical activity in the past. In Human Osteology in Archaeology and Forensic Science. 381 – 401. London: Greenwich Medical Media Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarlson, K.J., F.E. Grine & O.M. Pearson. 2007. Robusticity and sexual dimorphism in the postcranium of modern hunter‐gatherers from Australia. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 134: 9 – 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuddleston, A.L., D. Rockwell, D.N. Kulund & R.B. Harrison. 1980. Bone mass in lifetime tennis athletes. JAMA 244: 1107 – 1109.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaapasalo, H., S. Kontulainen, H. Sievanen, et al. 2000. Exercise‐induced bone gain is due to enlargement in bone size without a change in volumetric bone density: a peripheral quantitative computed tomography study of the upper arms of male tennis players. Bone 27: 351 – 357.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDaly, R.M., L. Saxon, C.H. Turner, et al. 2004. The relationship between muscle size and bone geometry during growth and in response to exercise. Bone 34: 281 – 287.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoy, T.A., C.B. Ruff & C.C. Plato. 1994. Hand dominance and bilateral asymmetry in the structure of the second metacarpal. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 94: 203 – 211.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRuff, C.B. & H.H. Jones. 1981. Bilateral asymmetry in cortical bone of the humerus and tibia: sex and age factors. Hum. Biol. 53: 69 – 86.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMays, S.A. 2002. Asymmetry in metacarpal cortical bone in a collection of British post‐medieval human skeletons. J. Archaeol. Sci. 29: 435 – 441.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRhodes, J.A. & C.J. Knüsel. 2005. Activity‐related skeletal change in medieval humeri: cross‐sectional and architectural alterations. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 128: 536 – 546.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarlson, K.J. et al. 2006. Locomotor behavior and long bone morphology in individual free‐ranging chimpanzees. J. Hum. Evol. 50: 394 – 404.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAuerbach B.M. & Raxter M.H. 2008. Patterns of clavicular bilateral asymmetry in relation to the humerus: variation among humans. J. Hum. Evol. 54: 663 – 674.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrost, H.M. 2003. Bone's mechanostat: a 2003 update. Anatom. Record 275A: 1081 – 1101.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePearson, O.M. & D.E. Lieberman. 2004. The aging of Wolff's “law”: ontogeny and responses to mechanical loading in cortical bone. Yrbk. Phys. Anthropol. 47: 63 – 99.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFritton, S.P., K.J. McLeod & C.T. Rubin. 2000. Quantifying the strain history of bone: spatial uniformity and self‐similarity of low‐magnitude strains. J. Biomech. 33: 317 – 325.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrayer, D.W. et al. 2012. More than 500,000 years of right‐handedness in Europe. Laterality 17: 51 – 69.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCox, M. 1996. Life and Death in Spitalfields, 1700–1850. York: Council for British Archaeology.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWatson P.J. & Thornhill R. 1994. Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 21 – 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStock, J.T., V.I. Bazaliiskii, O.I. Goriunova, N.A. Savel'ev & A.W. Weber. 2010. “ Skeletal morphology, climatic adaptation and habitual behaviour among the mid‐Holocene populations of the Cis‐Baikal, relative to other hunter‐gatherers.” In Prehistoric Hunter‐Gatherers of the Baikal Region, Siberia: Bioarchaeological Studies of Past Lifeways. A. Weber, M.A. Katzenberg & T. Schurr, Eds.: 193 – 216. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology Pubs.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStock, J.T., S. Pfeiffer, M. Chazan & J. Janetski. 2005. The F‐81 skeleton from Wadi Mataha, Jordan, and its bearing on human variability in the Epipaleolithic of the Levant. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 128: 453 – 465.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaymond, M. & D. Pontier. 2004. Is there geographical variation in human handedness? Laterality 9: 35 – 51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarchant, L.F., W.C. McGrew & I. Eibl‐Eibesfeldt. 1995. Is human handedness universal? Ethological analyses from three traditional cultures. Ethology 101: 239 – 258.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Agostini, M., A.H. Khamis, A.M. Ahui & G. Dellatolas. 1997. Environmental influences in hand preference: an African point of view. Brain Cogn. 35: 151 – 167.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlackburn, A. 2011. Bilateral asymmetry of the humerus during growth and development. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 145: 639 – 646.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCashmore, L.A. 2009. Can hominin handedness be accurately assessed? Ann. Hum. Biol. 36: 624 – 641.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCashmore, L., N. Uomini & A. Chapelain. 2008. The evolution of handedness in humans and great apes: a review and current issues. J. Anthropol. Sci. 86: 7 – 35.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarchant, L.F. & W.C. McGrew. 2007. Ant fishing by wild chimpanzees is not lateralised. Primates 48: 22 – 26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorp, N. & R.W. Byrne. 2004. Sex difference in chimpanzee handedness. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 123: 62 – 68.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMedland, S.E., I.B. Perelle, V. De Monte & L. Ehrman. 2004. Effects of culture, sex and age on the distribution of handedness: an evaluation of the sensitivity of three measures of handedness. Laterality 9: 287 – 297.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHalpern, M.E., O. Gunturkun, W.D. Hopkins & L.J. Rogers. 2005. Lateralization of the vertebrate brain: taking the side of model systems. J. Neurosci. 25: 10351 – 10357.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorballis, M.C. 2003. From mouth to hand: gesture, speech and the evolution of right‐handedness. Behav. Brain Sci. 26: 199 – 260.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWestergaard, G.C. 1994. Language, tools and neurobehavioral laterality. Commentary on: Greenfield PM. Language, tools and brain: the ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchically organized sequential behavior. Behav. Brain Sci. 17: 357 – 365.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHewes, G.W. 1973. Communication and the gestural origin of language. Curr. Anthropol. 14: 65 – 84.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrost, G.T. 1980. Tool behavior and the origins of laterality. J. Hum. Evol. 9: 447 – 459.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKimura, D. 1979. Neuromotor mechanisms in the evolution of human communication. In Neurobiology of Social Communication in Primates. 197 – 219. San Diego: Academic Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWestergaard, G.C. & S.J. Suomi. 1996. Hand preference for stone artefact production and tool‐use by monkeys: possible implications for the evolution of right‐handedness in hominids. J. Hum. Evol. 30: 291 – 298.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
nyas12067.pdf
Size:
303.3KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.