Association of RENAL nephrometry score with outcomes of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy
dc.contributor.author | Ellison, Jonathan S | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Montgomery, Jeffrey S | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hafez, Khaled S | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Miller, David C | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | He, Chang | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wolf, J Stuart | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Weizer, Alon Z | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-06-18T18:32:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-08-01T19:11:33Z | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2013-06 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Ellison, Jonathan S; Montgomery, Jeffrey S; Hafez, Khaled S; Miller, David C; He, Chang; Wolf, J Stuart; Weizer, Alon Z (2013). "Association of RENAL nephrometry score with outcomes of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy." International Journal of Urology (6): 564-570. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/98294> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0919-8172 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1442-2042 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/98294 | |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Renal Cell Carcinoma | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Kidney Neoplasms | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Laparoscopy | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Robotics | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Nephron‐Sparing Surgery | en_US |
dc.title | Association of RENAL nephrometry score with outcomes of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Internal Medicine and Specialties | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 23126585 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/98294/1/iju3222.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03222.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | International Journal of Urology | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wheat JC, Roberts WW, Hollenbeck BK, Stuart Wolf Jr J, Weizer AZ. Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Urol. Oncol. 2011; doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.11.003. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Simhan J, Smaldone MC, Tsai KJ et al. Perioperative outcomes for robotic and open partial nephrectomy in moderately and highly complex renal lesions. J. Urol. 2012; 187: 2000 – 2004. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J. Urol. 2009; 182: 844 – 853. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR et al. Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J. Urol. 2007; 178: 41 – 46. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Canter D, Kutikov A, Manley B et al. Utility of the R.E.N.A.L nephrometry scoring system in objectifying treatment decision‐making of the enhancing renal mass. Urology 2011; 78: 1089 – 1094. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kutikov A, Smaldone MC, Egleston BL et al. Anatomic features of enhancing renal masses predict malignant and high‐grade pathology: a preoperative nomogram using the RENAL Nephrometry score. Eur. Urol. 2011; 60: 241 – 248. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Haber GP, White WM, Crouzet S et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: single‐surgeon matched cohort study of 150 patients. Urology 2010; 76: 754 – 758. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Weizer AZ, Gilbert SM, Roberts WW, Hollenbeck BK, Wolf JS Jr. Tailoring technique of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy to tumor characteristics. J. Urol. 2008; 180: 1273 – 1278. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Levey AS, Greene T, Schluchter MD et al. Glomerular filtration rate measurements in clinical trials. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group and the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 1993; 4: 1159 – 1171. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg. 2004; 240: 205 – 213. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Weight CJ, Atwell TD, Fazzio RT et al. A multidisciplinary evaluation of inter‐reviewer agreement of the nephrometry score and the prediction of long‐term outcomes. J. Urol. 2011; 186: 1223 – 1228. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kolla SB, Spiess PE, Sexton WJ. Interobserver reliability of the RENAL nephrometry scoring system. Urology 2011; 78: 592 – 594. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mufarrij PW, Krane LS, Rajamahanty S, Hemal AK. Does nephrometry scoring of renal tumors predict outcomes in patients selected for robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy? J. Endourol. 2011; 25: 1649 – 1653. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hayn MH, Schwaab T, Underwood W, Kim HL. RENAL nephrometry score predicts surgical outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int. 2011; 108: 876 – 881. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rosevear HM, Gellhaus PT, Lightfoot AJ, Kresowik TP, Joudi FN, Tracy CR. Utility of the RENAL nephrometry scoring system in the real world: predicting surgeon operative preference and complication risk. BJU Int. 2012; 109: 700 – 705. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Simhan J, Smaldone MC, Tsai KJ et al. Objective measures of renal mass anatomic complexity predict rates of major complications following partial nephrectomy. Eur. Urol. 2011; 60: 724 – 730. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hew MN, Baseskioglu B, Barwari K et al. Critical appraisal of the PADUA classification and assessment of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. J. Urol. 2011; 186: 42 – 46. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.