Show simple item record

Nurse Engagement and Contributions to the Clinical and Translational Science Awards Initiative

dc.contributor.authorSampselle, Carolyn M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKnafl, Kathleen A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJacob, Jacqueline Dunbaren_US
dc.contributor.authorMcCloskey, Donna Joen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-18T18:33:04Z
dc.date.available2014-08-01T19:11:33Zen_US
dc.date.issued2013-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationSampselle, Carolyn M.; Knafl, Kathleen A.; Jacob, Jacqueline Dunbar; McCloskey, Donna Jo (2013). "Nurse Engagement and Contributions to the Clinical and Translational Science Awards Initiative." Clinical and Translational Science 6(3): 191-195. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/98323>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1752-8054en_US
dc.identifier.issn1752-8062en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/98323
dc.description.abstractCTSAs are mandated to follow a multidisciplinary model. Requests for applications direct responsive applications to “integrate clinical and translational science across multiple departments, schools,” listing disciplines in addition to medicine such as engineering, nursing, and public health. This inventory of nurse engagement in CTSAs describes the extent of nursing's CTSA engagement from the perspective of participating nurse scientists within individual CTSAs, including institutional/national contributions and best practices that foster a multidisciplinary model. Of the 50 CTSAs affiliated with a nursing school, 44 responded (88% response rate). Of the ten CTSAs not affiliated with a nursing school, four responded (40% response rate). Overall funding success rates of nurse applicants are: TL1 fellowships 81%, KL2 fellowships 54%, and nurse‐led pilots 58%. At most CTSAs nursing is contributing to the accomplishment of the CTSA mandate. The strongest categories of contribution are community engagement, implementation science, and training. Best practices to enhance multidisciplinary collaboration are: (1) inclusion of multiple disciplines on key committees who meet regularly to guide individual core and overall CTSA strategic planning and implementation; (2) required multidisciplinary co‐mentors (ideally from different schools within the CTSA) on training grants and as co‐investigators on pilot projects; and (3) documentation of multidisciplinary activity in annual reports.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherNurseen_US
dc.subject.otherEngagementen_US
dc.subject.otherMultidisciplinaryen_US
dc.titleNurse Engagement and Contributions to the Clinical and Translational Science Awards Initiativeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPharmacy and Pharmacologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid23751023en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/98323/1/cts12020.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cts.12020en_US
dc.identifier.sourceClinical and Translational Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollins F. ASCB 50 th anniversary essay: change, change, change: heeding the call. Mol Biol Cell. 2010; 21 ( 22 ): 3793 – 3794.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZerhouni E. The NIH roadmap. Science. 2003; 302: 63 – 64, 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBringing Science to Life NINR Strategic Plan‐ NIH publication #11–7783; Printed October 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencewww.Qualtrics.com 2010.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnafl K, Grey M. Clinical Translational Science Awards: opportunities and challenges for nurse scientists. Nurs Outlook. 2008; 56: 132 – 137.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.